Priaptor
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Posts
- 232
- Likes
- 151
I like the X as well and are not trying to convince you to pick up anything else. Just saying that the Hugo don’t have much power to give the LCD 3F and the LCD X will be a better chose if we look at it from a power driving aspect.
Trust me, I get it.
When I first got a pair of HD800 to try, all I had was the HUGO to test it with and until I got a different amp did I see why so many love them. While I "only" had the new Mac headamp to test it with at the time, it had plenty of power and sounded much "better" than being driven by the HUGO. Same for the new Mac cans.
Even with the HUGO, there was plenty to drive the 3F. I actually found the HUGO better than the new Mac headamp with the 3F. I tried the X and 3F on a whim having lived with the FOSTEX TH900 for 6 months. I really liked the 3F, don't get me wrong and in fact those were the cans that were recommended I try. I am really happy I also got the X to try as it was one of those immediate moments where you know exactly what it is you have been looking for you found. In fact, I figured I would keep both the X and the TH900 the latter for those occasions when I wanted closed headphones. I was so enthralled with the X that every time I went to pick up a pair of headphones, all I did was pick up the X and just sold the TH900. I just find the HUGO + X a combination that, at this point in time, is very hard to beat when it comes to my preferences. This could change, but for now, this rings my bell and to my tastes, I find the X better than the 3F regardless of what others believe.