Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyHoney /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Superpredator, I would like to hear a quick comparison between W1000X and M50 especially bass wise. And is W1000X an amp wh0re
|
Too early for a meaningful comparison, but first impressions are telling me the M50 is for monitoring and the W1000X for pleasure. The M50 really seems to like being fed well recorded material (HDtracks). The W1000X doesn't seem to require it quite as much, but with it, it shines (and outshines the M50). Even with a bit of a smile curve, the M50 is probably the most neutral AT I've heard, though that may be something of an oxymoron. The M50 lacks most of the romantic tone often found in the W line, and rightly so, considering its intended purpose. Even so, if a recording has a romantic tone, the M50 seems to convey it. Both sound quite holographic with the Open Your Ears tracks, but of course that's one of the Yamamoto's strong suits.
The M50's bass is a great pairing of quality and quantity, and goes deep, seeming to form a nice complete note. However, with only a few hours burn in, it seems to take up a great deal of the available sound space, kind of crowding out other elements at times. The W1000X throws out some really big bass as well, but so far it seems to emphasize the mid-low region (I probably have around 70 hours clocked at present). Because of its completeness, the M50 seemed to be just a little more convincing on Joanna Newsom's The Book of Right-On. The M50 forms a tighter seal, which could account for some of the difference.
I haven't really done enough A/Bing to comment much on mids or highs. Treble might be more lifelike with the W1000X, but both present micro-detail very well, allowing me to not only "see" lip movement, but also to differentiate nose/mouth inhalations that occur simultaneously on Bic Runga's Captured.
The M50 sounds pleasant enough out of a g1 Shuffle. Certainly listenable. Better out of the Yamamoto, though the dullness of a dull recording is more obvious. The W1000X wasn't completely unpleasant out of the Shuffle in terms of the overall sound, but the highs seemed very uncontrolled and fatigued me almost within seconds.
Again, these are just preliminary observations on headphones that have yet to be fully burned in, so take them for what they're worth. If the weather sucks this weekend maybe I'll make some headway on my AT roundup. Sorry to hijack the thread.
Edit: one thing I'm sure of is that the M50 trounces the HD280.