LouisArmstrong
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2015
- Posts
- 1,491
- Likes
- 354
I see from their website the words "now AK380 is the start"... which means...
They are Korean companyAre they a Japanese company and that's a translation? It reads like a really bad one.
I'm a professional J to E translator. Someone tell them I'll competently translate their page for a single AK380.
I see from their website the words "now AK380 is the start"... which means...
Maybe you guys should summarise all the questions you hope answered. I'll see what I can try to ask. There's a closed presentation tomorrow of which Currawong & I are invited to (thanks to Sasaki-san) before the Fujiya Spring Festival doors open. If the presentation doesn't cover the questions you have, we can ask after in Q&A or private session with AK.
When your reply, please quote my post here. I'll use it for tracking. I've been busy with work and haven't had time to read through all the past posts before this morning.
My Main question will be: when will they integrate QOBUZ or TIDAL streaming. on Munich's show, their staff admited honestly that those développements are on hold !?
Suggestion: have 2 versions: 256 Gb and 512 Gb.
PLUS FYI
One thing I noticed: the internal amp is WEAK ! Maximum on the AK380 = "Blue" on my HUGO
Thanks
you can hardly count DXD as the mainstream music. There are hardly any albums in the DXD format unless I am unaware of.Yes, I bet they don't listen to 32bit 382kHz DXD albums. One DXD album is about 10GB.
It means we can put only 30 DXD / DSD128 albums into this machine.
Who pays 3500 dollars to just play 30 albums?
They need a 512GB version ASAP.
or we have to wait till Sandisk release a 2TB microSD card. It will take seven to ten more years and 2TB microSD card's price will rival the price of AK380.
you can hardly count DXD as the mainstream music. There are hardly any albums in the DXD format unless I am unaware of.
one thing i don't understand, when stainles steel is better than duraluminium why not use this body for their new flagship product.... i own a ak240 and like the sound signature very much even if my hugo sounds better. it's kind of sad seeing marketing / marging desicions beeing so prominent for iriver/ak. but it looks sexy and with all the add ons it will be joyful to play with, the biggest no go for me: only 256gb, hope since years for a dap who carries all my music and with under 700gb its no massive.
one thing i don't understand, when stainles steel is better than duraluminium why not use this body for their new flagship product.... i own a ak240 and like the sound signature very much even if my hugo sounds better. it's kind of sad seeing marketing / marging desicions beeing so prominent for iriver/ak. but it looks sexy and with all the add ons it will be joyful to play with, the biggest no go for me: only 256gb, hope since years for a dap who carries all my music and with under 700gb its no massive.
And they know there are a couple of thousand people who will throw their money at any new flagship AK DAP, regardless of price, regardless of specs. It's like a never-ending cash-cow for them.
Many will think I'm joking about this, but I'm not: I predict the AK380 won't sound substantially better than the PAW 5000.
A&K are so busy price-gouging, that they're forgetting that the sub-$1000 audiophile DAP market is rapidly improving. Gone are the days (not so long ago) when SQ differences were larger between mid-market and high-end DAPs.
[rule]
Actually. I was idly thinking about something else yesterday...
E
If a company had, say, a few hundred DAPs manufactured, but sales were slowing and the company had a new, unannounced, model nearing completion and release (which would inevitably slow sales of the older model even further), what could they do to stimulate sales of the older model, a few hundred units of which they were struggling to shift, just a couple of months before the new model was due out?
Well, it 'suddenly occurred' to me that one simple idea could be to simply repackage those few hundred DAPs in a shiny new casing, to appeal to bling-seekers. Stainless steel could be one material option.
Then, once those units had been shifted, the new model could be announced.
It would leave a few hundred customers feeling aggrieved, but hey - they're only faceless individuals with yet more money to throw at their audiophile obsessions when the newer model is released, just around the corner...
Anyway, this was all just day-dreaming in my mind, yesterday. I'm sure no real-life company would be so cynical as to do something like that.
Pleas ask the following:
#1 "How much are the USB cradle and the amp card?"
#2 "Does the amp card improve sound quality?"
#3 "Does the amp card have an extra battery inside? If not, does it drain AK380's internal battery faster?"
#4 "When can we see them on Amazon?"
#5 "How long is AK380's battery life?"
I'm not going to ask Q#2 for really obvious reasons. ....
we could rephrase the question to make it valid. I.e. Since that amp module can only fit the AK380, in which aspects does it benefit the source?I appreciate that it might be an uncomfortable question for them to answer, but it's a totally legitimate question that they should answer, if they're profiting from it as an expensive optional addition to an already insanely-overpriced DAP.
I'm going to be honest and think those are pointless questions. They're not going to kill their potential AK380 sales by giving the audience an opportunity to wait (of whom there is no guarantee those customer would buy if/when these "tailored" models get released) when the AK380 itself hasn't even been released/sold yet. Remember tomorrow is just an announcement.