music_4321
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Posts
- 5,120
- Likes
- 341
Quote:
Re the text in bold, I've stated already that, to these ears, the ES3X is not 'world's apart' from the UM3X. I've had 2 re-fits (or 3 sets), and all 3 have NOT been 'worlds apart' from my UM3X. I'll just mention again that, in my case, I'm getting a perfect fit, great isolation and great SQ from the medium soft grey silicone tips. Yes, the ES3X's are better, but judging by your statement I'd probably think 'I definitely want those ES3X' when in fact, owning both, I'd say if you get the right tips, for $350 you're getting a fantastic set of high-end IEM's and there's no reason to upgrade, unless you're prepared to spend a hell of a lot more for better - though not massively so - SQ.
And the above shows one of the problems I've also mentioned before - our concept/ definition of good/ better/ worlds apart/huge/ significant/ etc. -- a problem I also notice when speaking/reading about portable amps (AND LOD's), though I've to admit my experience there is much more limited to the RSA P-51 Mustang & Nuforce Icon Mobile and 3 LOD's ranging from $30-$80.
Originally Posted by shigzeo /img/forum/go_quote.gif i have had the sa6 and now the custom ct6 from sleek. they are worlds apart. the same must be true of the um3x and the es3x. the reason basically is bone conduction. with bone conduction. you don't only hear the sounds, but your ourter and inner ear feel the vibrations which are not dampened at all as with flanges and foams and even the custom ear pieces that you an build. the tube is bigger and that probably makes a difference, but it also means that that big tube feeds more vibrations into the places that matter most. trust me, my sleek ct6 is leagues better than the se530 which costs more. if the se530 was housed in a nice custom, it would probably be a completely different animal. |
Re the text in bold, I've stated already that, to these ears, the ES3X is not 'world's apart' from the UM3X. I've had 2 re-fits (or 3 sets), and all 3 have NOT been 'worlds apart' from my UM3X. I'll just mention again that, in my case, I'm getting a perfect fit, great isolation and great SQ from the medium soft grey silicone tips. Yes, the ES3X's are better, but judging by your statement I'd probably think 'I definitely want those ES3X' when in fact, owning both, I'd say if you get the right tips, for $350 you're getting a fantastic set of high-end IEM's and there's no reason to upgrade, unless you're prepared to spend a hell of a lot more for better - though not massively so - SQ.
And the above shows one of the problems I've also mentioned before - our concept/ definition of good/ better/ worlds apart/huge/ significant/ etc. -- a problem I also notice when speaking/reading about portable amps (AND LOD's), though I've to admit my experience there is much more limited to the RSA P-51 Mustang & Nuforce Icon Mobile and 3 LOD's ranging from $30-$80.