Shark_Jump
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2009
- Posts
- 355
- Likes
- 12
Quote:
Very good link. Some straightforward analysis with unambiguous conclusion - smells like a breath of fresh air! I note comments at the end (See below)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 comments to CAS 7: iTunes PC 8.1.1.10 problem
Tommy
May 27th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
If the itunes is bit perfect and transparent, why those expense software like Amarra can improve the sound quality?
admin
May 27th, 2009 at 9:47 pm
Hello Tommy,
Amarra has some user features which makes it a better choice, although Amarra also uses iTunes as database library arrangement. I can name two good features.
Amarra automatically changes sampling rate based on the file format. This is very good feature when you have a mixed sampling files on one play list.
Amarra provides volume control which is better design than iTunes one. The Amarra volume control supports remote by iTunes/iPhone. This provides a total solution
---------------------------------------------------------------------
If this is the case Itunes Amarra for the Mac seems a lot of $$$s to spend just to avoid having to manually change audio settings (bit rate).
Does Almarra bring anything else to the table for Mac SQ apart from this?
Originally Posted by dugq /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm not sure if this has been posted yet, but itunes on the mac is bit perfect Design w Sound » CAS 7: iTunes PC 8.1.1.10 problem |
Very good link. Some straightforward analysis with unambiguous conclusion - smells like a breath of fresh air! I note comments at the end (See below)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 comments to CAS 7: iTunes PC 8.1.1.10 problem
Tommy
May 27th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
If the itunes is bit perfect and transparent, why those expense software like Amarra can improve the sound quality?
admin
May 27th, 2009 at 9:47 pm
Hello Tommy,
Amarra has some user features which makes it a better choice, although Amarra also uses iTunes as database library arrangement. I can name two good features.
Amarra automatically changes sampling rate based on the file format. This is very good feature when you have a mixed sampling files on one play list.
Amarra provides volume control which is better design than iTunes one. The Amarra volume control supports remote by iTunes/iPhone. This provides a total solution
---------------------------------------------------------------------
If this is the case Itunes Amarra for the Mac seems a lot of $$$s to spend just to avoid having to manually change audio settings (bit rate).
Does Almarra bring anything else to the table for Mac SQ apart from this?