AKG's new K872?
Apr 10, 2017 at 1:58 PM Post #406 of 642


This is a pic of how I did my sorbothane mod-this is shown with Dynamat Extreme which sounded horrible, using sorbothane in the same spots sounds much better. 
 
Didn't want to take my pads off to show the actual sorbothane pieces because I have so much trouble getting the pads back on.
 
Apr 10, 2017 at 5:09 PM Post #407 of 642
This is a pic of how I did my sorbothane mod-this is shown with Dynamat Extreme which sounded horrible, using sorbothane in the same spots sounds much better...

And you placed the foam ring back over all of that? How thick are the sorbothane pieces?
 
Apr 10, 2017 at 6:41 PM Post #408 of 642
Especially the stock version of the K872 is quite dark sounding, because Harman wanted to meet the average presumed "American" taste.
L3000.gif

 
They can be a bit dark sounding if you don't position them correctly, which I have just found out, after seven months of use.
 
Up to today I had been wearing them so my ears were about in the center of the pad openings, which is usually the ideal spot on circumaural headphones. I liked the sound but was always a bit bothered by the less than ideal fit and seal, as well as a bit of coarseness or unevenness (coolness) in the treble. I decided to reposition the inner headband height setting so the K872 sat higher up on my head and so that my ear lobes were sitting just inside the edge of the bottom of the pads. I can actually shake my head a bit and the headphones stay put. Previously the slightest movement would shift the phones and the sound.
 
Suddenly I had the right seal and fit, and suddenly the treble sounded like nice airy, open treble, maybe a bit too present. I put the foam rings back in and BINGO.....balance, imaging, focus all sounded better. The top end still is AKG flavor but is more airy with a wee touch of sparkle.
 
Apr 10, 2017 at 9:24 PM Post #409 of 642
  And you placed the foam ring back over all of that? How thick are the sorbothane pieces?

 
No, I left the foam ring off. the sorbothane pieces are pretty thick-they get up to 8mm in the middle:
 
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00ZADBDYE/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o08_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
 
Apr 11, 2017 at 3:35 PM Post #410 of 642
@Beagle
​Thanks for you tips regarding positioning, but I think that this is not the reason for my impressions, because I tried different positions on my head. I agree that a good seal is very important with the K872. It seems that we simply have a different taste. Even without the foam rings, the K872 has a rather prominent bass, IMHO. I like that, but with some tracks it is still a tad too much. I do not have any problems with sibilance of the defoamed K872, in contrast to the K812 with its infamous treble peak. By the way, both are good headphones in my opinion, considering their prices. This simple mod for the K872 is a boon for its owners, because its sound can be changed quite a bit by removing the foam rings or inserting them again, if one does not like result.
 
Apr 12, 2017 at 9:47 AM Post #411 of 642
... ​Thanks for you tips regarding positioning, but I think that this is not the reason for my impressions, because I tried different positions on my head. I agree that a good seal is very important with the K872...

Yes, well, there seems to be conflicting opinions on this "positioning" business.
 
I personally have not noticed any variations with "slight" adjustments (I'm not interested in doing yoga with them on
tongue.gif
) and if we assume they are close in basic characteristics to the 812, @Tyll Hertsens also ran his FR analysis* in five different positions without any real changes.
On the flip-side, this one reviewer said re-positioning them made a particular issue go away:
 
"...When the headphone is fighting you and not positioning itself correctly the sound quality heavily spikes in the mid-range making everything sound incredibly boxy, so if you start noticing a hotter mid-range work on the positioning the headphone..."
 
There could of course be a direct correlation with positioning and proper seal. IMHO positioning can easily be checked as the isolation on the 872s is top. Should you at some point notice a decrease in isolation then re-positioning is required.
 
beerchug.gif

 
*Link to InnerFidelity's 812 measurements:
http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/AKGK812SN001130.pdf
http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/AKGK812SN002100.pdf
 
Apr 12, 2017 at 10:38 AM Post #412 of 642
Position, music preference, tuning preference, listening level........all can play a part.
 
I know when I first removed the rings it sounded much thinner with less bass and the sibilance was unbearable.
 
But I have a pretty high listening level. Someone with a lower listening level won't be bothered by the sibilance. Also bass is not as critical in classical music as others and gets in the way of the treble and mid clarity.
 
So, if you have a low listening level and enjoy classical music, take out the rings.
 
but if you have a high listening level and like somewhat bassy music, leave them in. Or do my sorb mod.
 
Apr 12, 2017 at 1:52 PM Post #413 of 642
  [...]
 
So, if you have a low listening level and enjoy classical music, take out the rings.
 
but if you have a high listening level and like somewhat bassy music, leave them in. Or do my sorb mod.

 
This seems to be good advice!
 
Back one last time to the "positioning" thing. I experienced that the bass disappears significantly with too low pressure of the K872 on your head. With the tightest step of the headband, the space between the earcups should not be much more than 3 cm. FritzS postet this (in German) at open-end-music forum:
 
http://www.open-end-music.de/vb3/showpost.php?p=238183&postcount=252
 
May 5, 2017 at 3:35 PM Post #414 of 642
Position, music preference, tuning preference, listening level........all can play a part.

I know when I first removed the rings it sounded much thinner with less bass and the sibilance was unbearable.

But I have a pretty high listening level. Someone with a lower listening level won't be bothered by the sibilance. Also bass is not as critical in classical music as others and gets in the way of the treble and mid clarity.

So, if you have a low listening level and enjoy classical music, take out the rings.

but if you have a high listening level and like somewhat bassy music, leave them in. Or do my sorb mod.

Hello, I am curious, early on in this thread I believe you mentioned owning the Audeze Lcd-xc yes? How would you say the stock version of these Akg k872 compare? Thank you.
 
May 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM Post #415 of 642
Hello, I am curious, early on in this thread I believe you mentioned owning the Audeze Lcd-xc yes? How would you say the stock version of these Akg k872 compare? Thank you.

I have the LCD-4, not the XC, also the EL-8 and the Sine if you're comparing closed headphones. Comparing to the EL-8, which is slightly better than the SIne, the K872 is better in every way: better soundstage, more treble clarity, better imaging, more musical, easier to drive, more comfortable, better, cleaner bass.
 
May 5, 2017 at 8:49 PM Post #416 of 642
I have the LCD-4, not the XC, also the EL-8 and the Sine if you're comparing closed headphones. Comparing to the EL-8, which is slightly better than the SIne, the K872 is better in every way: better soundstage, more treble clarity, better imaging, more musical, easier to drive, more comfortable, better, cleaner bass.


I see, all sounds great.

I produce/mix for a living and use and love my hd800, I've read through most of this thread but am curious to ask you (as I see you too are an audio professional), would you say that if I am looking for the closed version of an hd800, the aka k872 is a great choice?
 
May 5, 2017 at 9:57 PM Post #417 of 642
I see, all sounds great.

I produce/mix for a living and use and love my hd800, I've read through most of this thread but am curious to ask you (as I see you too are an audio professional), would you say that if I am looking for the closed version of an hd800, the aka k872 is a great choice?

If you're looking for a closed version of the HD800 *maybe*

For mixing man, I can't mix with the HD800, boosted treble, rolled off bass.

I'd personally recommend an Oppo PM-1 which is almost completely flat for pro mixing. PM-1 is a bit boring but a great mixing tool if you're forced to use headphones. The K872 has slightly boosted treble, bass a bit rolled off like the HD800, just not as much.
 
May 6, 2017 at 1:51 AM Post #418 of 642
If you're looking for a closed version of the HD800 *maybe*

For mixing man, I can't mix with the HD800, boosted treble, rolled off bass.

I'd personally recommend an Oppo PM-1 which is almost completely flat for pro mixing. PM-1 is a bit boring but a great mixing tool if you're forced to use headphones. The K872 has slightly boosted treble, bass a bit rolled off like the HD800, just not as much.

Interesting, I will definitely check out the Oppo. Yes I love the Hd800 for mixing but maybe I'm just used to them, I go back and forth between my Hd800 and my Amphions when mixing but have been feeling I should add a closed back reference headphone. I'll still look into the akg k872 but the oppo seems quite interesting
 
Aug 21, 2017 at 3:36 PM Post #419 of 642
They can be a bit dark sounding if you don't position them correctly, which I have just found out, after seven months of use.

Up to today I had been wearing them so my ears were about in the center of the pad openings, which is usually the ideal spot on circumaural headphones. I liked the sound but was always a bit bothered by the less than ideal fit and seal, as well as a bit of coarseness or unevenness (coolness) in the treble. I decided to reposition the inner headband height setting so the K872 sat higher up on my head and so that my ear lobes were sitting just inside the edge of the bottom of the pads. I can actually shake my head a bit and the headphones stay put. Previously the slightest movement would shift the phones and the sound.

Suddenly I had the right seal and fit, and suddenly the treble sounded like nice airy, open treble, maybe a bit too present. I put the foam rings back in and BINGO.....balance, imaging, focus all sounded better. The top end still is AKG flavor but is more airy with a wee touch of sparkle.
Thanks a lot for this advice Beagle; the harshness of the treble disappeared and the sound was much better then before!
 
Aug 26, 2017 at 10:50 AM Post #420 of 642
Just bought a pair. They did turn up in Hong Kong, and a demo pair was available to try. Just the timing ability was enough to convince me: $1111 USD, so a good price.

Running them in, but first observations:

They isolate really well.
They are really comfortable.
Shame about the boosted from neutral bass. I guess this is Harman policy due to the very good research by Dr. Olive. He has a point but I do not agree completely.
They don't sound closed, except for the isolation. Nice.

They are MUCH more sensitive than my Audeze Sines. The spec numbers did not suggest this. As I plan on having these as my work headphone running on portable USB DACs and my LG G6 phone, that is good news.

They remind me of a AKG K545, the slightly bassier cousin of the K550, but much more refined.

More observations after they run in, but they are NOT a closed HD800. Shame.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top