Quote:
Quote:
"“You don't necessarily get to schedule wins (in the Pac-10) like everyone else does in the country,” said UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel, whose Bruins didn’t go for the cupcake victories when his Bruins (4-8) played Kansas State, Houston and Texas.
“What you’ll see is a trend of schools starting to schedule (non-conference) games they can win to give them a little cushion when it comes to league play,” said Washington coach Steve Sarkisian, who knows how the Pac-10 played a combined seven games against FCS opponents in 2010 while the ACC and the SEC cakewalked through 13 and 11 FCS teams, respectively."
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/bowl-279086-conference-postseason.html
It's just going to be that much sweeter when the Ducks take the championship
And like I said Thomas has good wheels as well as being poised in the pocket. That was a great article, here's the link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/05/magazine/05Football-t.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=oregon%20ducks&st=cs
Dude, your non-conference schedule has the appearence of being tougher because for the most part your conference schedule is a cake walk.
In your opinion, you forgot that part since you have not come up with anything to support your assertion.
The Pac's bowl record isn't too shabby either, 3rd best over the last decade against BCS teams, second as far as major conferences; SEC was first though. The Pac's modern Rose Bowl record also proves they are no pushovers.
Just for the record, I take it you are picking Auburn for the BCS championship?
