214324
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Posts
- 7,783
- Likes
- 164
I've just discovered that even with a calibrator, it's reaaaallly difficult to get monitors to match *exactly*.
And it seems that only OS X applies the ICC profiles on the desktop, on Windows we have to be using lightroom/photoshop and stuff. There is a way to have madVR use the profiles though....boy this is starting to get reaaaal time consuming.
Unless it's the same panel then yeah it's really hard. Even looking at the monitor reviews on TFT Central you can see good amounts of variation in the panels used across different monitors in the same range and size (ex. all 24" Dell Ultrasharps). I think the 2 largest issues are 1. black levels and 2. white point. Those tend to vary a lot even within the same panel technologies.
QC doesn't get insane till you start shelling out the big bucks for NEC displays and others of the same breed or for uber-expensive calibration hardware.
https://pcmonitors.info/articles/using-icc-profiles-in-windows/
I'd assume OS X just lets you open the ICC file and it'll apply it but for Windows you need some digging.
But some programs still ignore ICC (examples in the article above) so the best way to get your calibrated results looking the same on everything? Spend an arm and a leg on a monitor with its own hardware LUT. (-_-")
I'm not sure if this issue is persistent in Linux but I know GNOME Color Manager may work like OS X's color profile manager. As for if certain programs may ignore the ICC profile in OS X or Linux I'm not sure. If you're running a Windows program via WINE that does ignore profiles, it probably does.
Kind of sad to see that VA hasn't particularly taken off. I wish IPS was higher level consumer and VA was mainstream. Personally I would take a VA monitor over an IPS one just for the superior black levels (and I think there were some pixel response time advantages? I'm not sure. Need to brush up on panel knowledge).