thaslaya's star rating system:
☆☆☆☆☆ - Fantastic!
☆☆☆☆ - Recommended
☆☆☆ - There are buyers but not for me
☆☆ - Can't see the appeal
☆ - Product is a failure
Disclaimer:
This set was provided for a trial period through the Watercooler tour. I recieve no compensation and all thoughts and opinions are my own. A big thank you to the company for the provided unit and to Rockwell75 for coordinating the tours.
Gear used:
●LG v30+
●Samsung Galaxy s22 Ultra
●Samsung dongle
●Hiby FC4
●Kiwi Ears Allegro
●Letshuoer DT03
●Dunu DTC480
●BLON V1
●iFi xDSD Gryphon
Source:
●Listening was done through Amazon Music HD or Ultra HD.
Introduction:
Elysian Acoustic Labs is a well-known, higher-end IEM manufacturer based in Singapore. Lee, the founder, is responsible for creating its house sound, which many hold in high esteem. The Annihilator 2023 is an updated version of the original 2021 model and utilizes a tribrid driver configuration consisting of one dynamic, four balanced armature, and two electrostatic drivers. It is available through Elysian's store in three faceplate options: gold-plated copper and stainless steel faceplates are $2,999, and a brushed titanium variant is $3,199. Bundles with upgraded cables are also available. The Annihilator 2023 has quite a reputation. It is regarded by many in the hobby as one of the best IEMs on the market and often ranks highly in voting polls. Let's break down this acclaimed IEM and see what it has to offer.
Build, fit, ergonomics:
Since this is a tour unit, I cannot speak to the unboxing or accessory package, as it only included the IEMs and the upgraded Effect Audio Fusion 1 cable. The Annihilator's shells are made of very clear resin and have a golden faceplate featuring Elysian's logo. They are a bit bulky and could be better contoured, but overall, the fit is comfortable for me. The metal nozzle measures 6.5 mm at the lip, and the insertion depth is about average. I really like how the internal components and all three driver types are easily visualized within the shells. Like Elysian's other IEMs, this one utilizes the Pentaconn ear connection, which makes cable swapping a bit harder as it is not as popular as other connections. There is also a vent located on the shells near the Pentaconn connection. The EA Fusion 1 cable included with this unit can be added to a bundle for an extra $700, but it retails separately for $1000. It is a two-wire cable made of UP-OCC material, gold-plated silver litz, pure silver litz, and pure copper litz hybrid. The hardware has a great aesthetic and color that matches the Annihilator's shells perfectly. The cable's weave is thick and feels good in hand, but it is a bit stiff; I would prefer it to be softer and more pliable. After extensive tip rolling, I found that the Dunu orb-like tips provide the best fit and seal for me. Utilizing a narrow-bore tip can help tame some of the Annihilator's treble, which is better suited to my preferences.
Sound impressions:
I would describe the Annihilator's overall tuning as V-shaped, with quite a boosted bass and accentuated treble. The midrange, for me, comes across as quite recessed, which, as a midrange lover, is a bit disappointing. The note weight is not bad, but it can veer toward the thin side occasionally. The Annihilator has great detail retrieval, as you'd expect for the price. The soundstage is excellent as well. It's very spacious but also sounds full and spherical. The timbre might be a touch unnatural to my ears, and it's not quite as organic as I'd like. The imaging is very accurate and the dynamics are impressive, too. The bass response remains strong regardless of the volume level, and the tuning is well-preserved. The separation is good, but it might be a little too much, as the overall sound is not as smooth and cohesive as I prefer. This set is not super difficult to drive and can reach moderate volume levels with just a simple dongle, but the Annihilator is notorious for scaling well with power. Generally, electrostatic drivers are the ones to scale best, but surprisingly, the most noticeable difference for me is how the dynamic driver's bass response improves when given ample power. On a low-power source, the bass sounds somewhat mushy and bloated, but give it some juice, and it becomes much more detailed and resolving. The Annihilator has generally impressive technicalities and an energetic and bassy tuning style that is fun and engaging.
Among the sources at my disposal, I found the best pairing to be with the iFi xDSD Gryphon, utilizing the GTO filter. This DAC/amp adds decent weight and a tiny bit of warmth. It also has ample power to drive the Annihilator and maximize the drivers' performance.
●Lows - The Annihilator is a bassy boy for sure. It is more sub-bass focused than mid-bass, but both have ample presence for me. The sub-bass extends deep and can reach low when called for. The bass texture is good; not wet or muddy, and not overly dry. The impact and slam are adequate, but the attack is a little soft and could be more incisive. There is no bass bleed to my ears, and it is well separated from the midrange. While the bass resolution improves with power, it is still underwhelming for the price. Notes sometimes come across as unfinished or ill-defined and can sound a bit puffy. The rumble and reverberation are a little overdone, the speed is a bit slow, and the decay lingers, which all leads to the bass having a slightly unnatural, overblown, and messy presentation. Overall, the bass is a bit over-accentuated and out of balance with the rest of the frequencies for my taste. It can be too dominant at times, not allowing the other frequencies, namely the midrange, room to breathe and shine. I want to be careful not to come across as overly critical. Despite what I have written here, the Annihilator's bass is mostly enjoyable, but for $3000, I am left quite disappointed in the bass performance.
●Mids - As a midrange enthusiast, this is where I take the most issue with the Annihilator's tuning. While the upper mids are a bit accentuated, vocals do not stand out in the mix as much as I would like. They are a bit recessed, pushed behind the big bass and bright treble. With softer music, like acoustic and singer-songwriter genres, vocals are better represented and enjoyable. But with pop and more bass-heavy genres, they are overshadowed and feel like an afterthought. Vocals are generally great and do not sound thin, shouty, or nasal, but they are just too underrepresented for my taste. Female artists fare better than their male counterparts, especially considering the lower mids lack weight and fullness. In orchestral arrangements, instruments in the lower midrange do not sound naturally balanced, which can make the entire arrangement sound off. The prominent bass tends to overpower some nuances of the midrange instruments, which become lost and overshadowed when the entire orchestra plays. The most frustrating thing for me is that the midrange quality is actually pretty great. There is no thinness, and it has a fairly realistic tonality and timbre. However, there is just an insufficient quantity of what is here to overcome the bass and treble for my preferences.
●Highs - Before I had the opportunity to try the Annihilator, some of my more experienced friends warned me that its treble might be too bright for me to endure, as someone who is treble-sensitive. I have not had the best experience with EST drivers in the past, but to my surprise, I actually don't find it overly irritating or harsh. It is definitely bright and can be a bit thin and ethereal-sounding, but it's not the biggest offender I've ever heard. The treble is energetic and sounds very clean and clear. Notes have a definitive edge and crispness. It can get a bit fatiguing over long periods, but there is no real sibilance or extremely harsh notes. Cymbals and hi-hats sound realistic and exciting, not splashy. Snares and claps are crisp and clean, but not overly piercing. There is a decent amount of air and extension, but I think it could use a bit more to take it to the next level. While I was quite skeptical initially, I am surprised by my enjoyment of the Annihilator's treble. Does its response fall within my typical preferences? No, but I can see its merits, and I think it can be a good choice for those who like a bright and fun treble without pushing it too far. This is yet another example that while impressions from friends and reviews like this one can be helpful, you should always trust your own ears, as there is just no substitute for firsthand experience.
Comparisons:
Credit to Jaytiss, Elise Audio,
and listener
for the graphs.
●
Penon Impact ($2,499) - Here we have the 1 DD, 4 BA, 2 EST tribrid configuration of the Annihilator versus the Impact's 10 BA, 4 EST hybrid. Again, both of these are tour sets without all the stock accessories, so I cannot really compare those. The Annihilator has a similar build to the Diva (resin body with metal nozzle) and is larger than the Impact. Both sets have similar build quality and fit comfortably, but the Impact does have that intermittent vacuum effect and the Annihilator utilizes the Pentaconn connector versus the 2-pin of the Impact. While both have golden designs on their faceplates, I prefer the Annihilator's slightly more subtle style. The Annihilator's tuning is more V-shaped with a noticeable midrange deficiency. The Impact sounds better balanced, with less bass, more midrange emphasis, and slightly more extended treble. The Annihilator's bass is boisterous and fun. It can reach very low with a nice rumble and reverberation. It is a far cry from the Impact's BA bass, which is still elevated but much more mid-bass focused. Although the bass responses of these two are quite different, I will give the nod to the Annihilator for better texture, extension, and rumble. The Impact's midrange takes pretty much all the points for me. The forward vocals are so much more to my liking than the Annihilator's recessed midrange, which lacks emphasis. The lower midrange is also much better represented on the Impact, specifically in orchestral arrangements where lower-registered instruments like cello, and some percussion and brass, sound more natural with better representation. As for the treble, the Annihilator has more of that brighter EST implementation that I am used to hearing. Some notes, especially snares and "s" and "sh" sounds, can come across as overly edgy and harsh. The Impact's ESTs, while still crisp and energetic, don't have the same wince-inducing quality. Both sets offer adequate air and sparkle but the Impact has slightly better extension and is a bit more balanced across all frequencies. On the technical front, the Annihilator has a larger soundstage with better imaging, detail retrieval, and dynamics. The Impact offers a more natural timbre, thicker note weight, and a warmer, smoother tonality. While neither of these two sets has a tuning that falls squarely within my preferences, I enjoy the Impact's overall balance and slightly more relaxed energy level and tonality a bit more. I do like the Annihilator's bolder bass with better sub-bass extension, but the Impact's vocals are smoother and better represented, which helps me better connect with my music.
My pick: Impact
●
Elysian Diva 2023 (~$1,200) - This matchup pits a 6 BA configuration versus a 1DD, 4 BA, 2 EST tribrid. The Annihilator's shell is slightly larger than the Diva's, but otherwise, both have almost identical shapes, nozzle sizes, insertion depths, and fits. I am unable to compare accessories since both are tour units and did not include all stock items. The Annihilator's tuning is much more V-shaped, with big bass and emphasized upper mids/treble, whereas the Diva has a more mid-centric tuning with an adjustable amount of bass and somewhat rolled-off treble. The Annihilator's low end is much fuller and more prominent, with deeper extension, greater reverberation, and slower decay, leading to a more natural presentation. The Diva's BA bass is less full-sounding and cannot reach as low, even on the bassiest setting. I prefer the texture, reverberation, and impact of the Annihilator's dynamic driver driven bass, but the overall quantity can be overly dominant on some tracks. The midrange of these two is quite different. The Diva is smooth and more forward, with better note weight and musicality. Vocals shine and are allowed much more of the spotlight. The Annihilator's midrange sounds more recessed and forced behind the bold bass and crisp treble. Vocals are clear and well-separated, but they take a back seat to the heavy bass emphasis. Also, the lower midrange of the Diva is more prominent and better represented. On the upper end of the frequency response, the Diva has a treble that is more in line with my preferences. It is present but fairly tame and rolled off. I especially like the way cymbals and hi-hats sound natural and crisp, but slightly recessed. On the Annihilator, those same notes can be quite incisive. It also has a tendency to sound thinner and exhibit some slight harshness and fatigue. However, it does offer more air and extension for treble enthusiasts. As far as technicalities go, the Diva has a more organic timbre, thicker note weight, and a slightly more intimate soundstage. The Annihilator takes the win in dynamics, imaging, detail retrieval, and separation, which comes as no surprise. This matchup really comes down to tuning preference, and these two are quite different. For me, the smoother and more mellow mid-centric tuning of the Diva plays right into my wheelhouse. The Annihilator is more energetic and fun and offers better technical performance, but the dominant bass and recessed midrange sound unnatural for my music library and preferences. This is an easy decision for me, but I'm sure many would opt to go the other way, considering the amount of love the Annihilator 2023 has.
My pick: Diva 2023
●
Letshuoer Cadenza 12 2024 ($2,000) - Here we have the Annihilator's 7-driver tribrid configuration versus the Cadenza's 12-driver hybrid (1 DD, 11 BA). I like the Annihilator's overall design and resin build a bit better, but the Cadenza's all-metal shell feels much sturdier, even if it is prone to scratches and fingerprints. The Cadenza's shell is also smaller, more contoured, and has a slightly deeper insertion. Overall, it offers a better fit and is more comfortable for me. I also prefer the Cadenza's 2-pin connection. I cannot make a judgment on total accessories since one of these is a tour unit. The tuning of the Annihilator is quite V-shaped compared to the Cadenza's more balanced and somewhat neutral approach. The Annihilator's bass is much bolder, with deeper sub-bass extension and more rumble and reverberation. The bass on the Cadenza sounds cleaner, with superior texture and resolution, but the quantity might be underwhelming for bass enthusiasts. The midrange is where the Cadenza wins a lot of points for me. Vocals are more forward, and both male and female artists are better represented, which is much more in line with my preferences. The Annihilator's midrange can be overshadowed by the bass and treble. The Cadenza also wins in the treble department. It is very well balanced with plenty of air and sparkle without venturing into fatiguing territory. The Annihilator undoubtedly has a brighter overall treble response and can be too energetic during long sessions. From a technically standpoint, these two trade blows pretty well. The Annihilator has a slight edge in soundstage, detail retrieval, and dynamics, whereas the Cadenza wins in timbre, imaging, and note weight. Overall, these two have quite different tuning philosophies. The Annihilator is more energetic and fun, with bigger bass and brighter treble, but it sacrifices some midrange magic. The Cadenza is much more balanced and closer to neutral, with a clean and inoffensive tuning that just sounds right, but it might considered be a bit boring for some. This is an easy choice for me, as the Cadenza offers a more refined and mature tuning that I expect when moving to the multi-kilobuck tier. Plus, it doesn't hurt that it is over $1,000 cheaper.
My pick: Cadenza 12
In conclusion:
The Annihilator 2023 is one of the most energetic, fun, and resolving TOTL sets I have heard so far. Unfortunately, it is just not a great match for my preferences and how I like to hear and connect with my music. For me, the bass quality is disappointing for the price, and the quantity can be a bit overdominant at times. The midrange is not as forward as I prefer, and it is missing some of the magical vocal qualities I love. The bright treble, while not overly harsh, can get somewhat fatiguing over long sessions. I wouldn't necessarily characterize the Annihilator as a good all-rounder, but I can still enjoy it in short bursts when paired with the right tracks. For me, it sounds best with less energetic genres where the bass response won't overwhelm the midrange, such as singer-songwriter, acoustic, and soft pop. While I am not typically a big proponent of EQ, I will say that this set responds to it well. I was also able to enjoy it much more through the iFi Gryphon, when combined with the right combination of options (STD filter and XBass II enabled in presence mode). However, similar to using EQ, I feel these options altered the stock tuning beyond what is reasonable for my standard review process. Though I still think it is worth noting that tools exist to bring the Annihilator closer to my preferences, helping me enjoy this set much more. But if such steps are necessary to alter the IEM's fundamental tuning, is it worth keeping, or is it better to continue searching for something else? Such questions can only be answered individually. While I may be a little disappointed with the Annihilator, I still think it holds great appeal for those whose tuning preferences align with its strengths. I cannot give it an outright glowing endorsement, but I can still recommend the Annihilator to those who want a fun and enjoyable V-shaped tuning with boisterous bass, energetic treble, and commendable technical performance. I will end my review with a slight word of caution and advise demoing this set before purchase, if possible.