Reviews by kiler

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Great Sound for the price, Good Battery Life
Cons: Bluetooth connection sometimes pitches up songs and is not the most reliable


Usability – You can use these headphones as any other IEM, you just pair them to your phone and then take them out of the case when you need to use them. One charge will last you around 2-3 hours and you can get 5 charges at least out of the case. The case will then charge up quickly, to provide you more juice to your in ear headphones. Sometimes the Bluetooth connection dropped and the pitch of the songs changed, but I’m unsure whether this is a phone or TWS problem (I’d assume it’s from the QCY implementation, since other Bluetooth headphones, like the MPOW H7 did not suffer from this issue).

Sound quality – V shaped sound. Bass goes down well, with nice rumble and quick punch, but not the most detailed bass. How much impact the bass has is very dependant on the seal you get with the eartips, so beware with how you insert the in ears. The mids are there to complement the sound signature more than actually be the focus, but they are pretty competent. The highs once again make sure cymbals on your favourite rap song hit and are noticed, but not sharp enough to hurt your ears from the hiss. The soundstage is pretty two dimensional. If I had to compare it with a wired headphone, I’d say the QCY QS2 sound pretty similar to a Xiaomi Piston 3, with a little more bass and little less detail.

Bottom line – They work the way they are intended to, easy to pair, no wires to mess up your training. The lack of IP certification might make them last less in the gym than ideal, but for the cheap price, it is a great pickup to just throw on your bag for everyday tasks.

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Acceptable Build Quality, Price
Cons: Not exceptional
The video review is here


The short but sweet review of these is that they are a decently built pair of wireless IEM that doesn't break the bank but doesn't impress either. Perfect for a beater pair you can throw in your gym bag and listen to for around 6-8 hours in between charges. Sound is V-Shaped, without any astounding detail quality, and the lack of aptX doesn't help.

Still, for 20 bucks, makes for an excellent gym beater since they aren't tonally bad souding!

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Great value. Good Bass.
Cons: If bass isn't your thing, they might be too muffled. Not audiophile grade sound.
So I've published this review in video form as always in the vid down below:


But if you prefer this review in a short written format I'll do my best.

Starting with the packaging, this is a sub 30$/€ headphone, which means you do not expect much. That is confirmed when you open up the packaging and find a 3.5to3.5mm male audio cable, a micro-USB for charging and a welcomed velour pouch (with cloth lining in the interior), which is always a plus for when you are going to travel with the headphones in a backpack, for example.

Going onto the quality of the headphones, the build quality is actually really appropriate for the price, the plastics seem durable enough and although the button quality is passable (they don't seem the most sturdy and don't have any engraving on them, making their use a bit difficult), overall the Mpow H7 certainly surprise with the insides of the headband in metal and overall sturdiness.

The comfort is also a nice plus, because the clamping force isn't too overwhelming and the nice big leather earcups make sure that your ears stay inside for a more comfortable fit. But the weaker clamping force means that this headphone might slip off during gym use for example.

Now onto the sound. These are clearly made for EDM and rap, as the thumping bass shows. And while you might be thinking that this is just some cheap mid-bass thump, it actually manages to deliver some good amount of subbass. But all this bass comes at the price of reduced clarity, for both mids and highs, which is to be expected with the target demographic of this headphone. This is not an audiophile can in any way, so the timbre and decay that you get from it are just below average. But what the Mpow H7 can certainly do is to be a fun headphone for the gym, as those Dre beats will keep you pumping hard throughout your workout. And at a price of just 25€, you can afford to replace them if they eventually break.
  • Like
Reactions: LaughMoreDaily

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Sound signature is balanced and not bass heavy at all.
Comfort is really good.
Excellent Battery life
Cons: Bass heads might not enjoy this type of sound signature.
I've published the review in video format below:



A brief summary of these headphones quality is the following:

Excellent packaging as we've grown to know from Xiaomi, with a really good and sturdy packaging case. The build quality of the Mi Sports is also up to par with the Piston line from Xiaomi and, if I had to pinpoint a similar sound to the one you have in these, I would say the Piston 3 would come pretty close to it. The neutral, polite and correct sound signature.

As for comfort, you can use for pretty lenghty periods of time with absolutely no issue, since they are really comfortable. The isolation isn't the best, which I suppose is to prevent runners becoming too isolated from the outside world.

For their price of around 20€ on Gearbest, I can easily recommend them if you want Sports in ear monitors that have a more neutral sound signature than the one you are used to find in common, bass-heavy models.

Buy them here: https://www.gearbest.com/sports-fitness-headphones/pp_560728.html
  • Like
Reactions: happy0713

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Tight bass from a Dual Dynamic IEM
Cons: Might be a bit too dark
The previous KZ iem I reviewed was the very acknowledged ZS5, which was supposed to be good and well known. But today I’m gonna write about a little less known and cheaper KZ product, the KZ ZSE. We have dual dynamic drivers in the inside with some vents for under 10$ and we know that KZ can do well done dynamic IEM, such as the KZ ATE. But are the ZSE good enough to be remembered? That is what I’m going to show you.

YouTube



Technical Data


Talking about technical data and specifications, nothing like using the specifications provided by amazon:

Connectivity : Wired

Application: Apple iOS and Android

Sensitivity: 100dB

Impedance: 16ohms

Frequency range: 20Hz-45000Hz

Microphone: option(with mic or without mic)

Cable Length: 120cm

Audio Jack: 3.5mm

Color: clear

All in all some interesting specs, but the lack of official specifications may mean you should look somewhere else for legit info.


Packaging

x8kxNJI.jpg


The packaging used here is the same used in the compact version of the ZS5. We got a simple package with a clear window that allows for the ZSE to be seen. Other than that, we got the ZSE name on the package.

fSu5WLh.jpg


The backside of the ZSE is the exact same as the one from the ZS5 since both versions are mic versions. This allows for KZ to have lower costs due to uniform packaging.


Build Quality and overall look

m3L8QpF.jpg


These are the KZ ZSE, a pair of IEM that are available in this clear casing with vents on the back. The dynamic drivers that are included are of 8mm and 6.8mm respectively and can be seen through the shell. The vents allow for the drivers to breathe and also help reducing the driver flex.

qzHs5Hr.jpg


In this picture we can take a closer looks at the drivers on the casing.

xu7UeHb.jpg


Without the included tip we see the included paper filter on the tip to prevent earwax reaching the drivers.

eJNQc6u.jpg


Going down to the cable, we find a 90 degree angled TTRS gold plated 3.5 jack. We also have a microphone and single button controls that allow you to skip tracks, pause music and answer calls. The cable used is the rubbery one that KZ headphone owners already know, which is relatively durable.

IMV6Vwe.jpg


To better understand why these are some durable in ear monitors (even though I would have liked to see some more durable stress reliefs on the housings), is the example of the Y-split which is sturdy and well built.

tjJvEpB.jpg


To finish with a single look on the ZSE, the housing is in pill shaped form, and we see that we have the side indicator on the strain relief.

While not shown, the accessories included are just 3 pairs of tips and an instruction manual which, like in the ZS5 case, is the bare minimum acceptable.


Comfort/Isolation

For a lot of folks that use their sound equipment for long durations during the day, comfort is rated pretty highly on their list, whenever they are looking for some new equipment. Since these are IEM’s, the things that should weigh the most would be the housing shape and weight, alongside the fit you can get with the tips compatible with them.

The KZ ZSE are honestly one of the most comfortable IEM I’ve used in the last year. The fact that they have a pill shaped form, means you can use them while on your side on your bed without much hassle. You can only use them cable down, but even then, if you don’t move much, the microphonics aren’t bad. The weight isn’t an issue as well, because the form of the IEM helps distributing it evenly across your ear. The included tips are the usual KZ silicone tips and they might slide out for some, making an upgrade to fake Hybrid tips a good upgrade route (foams muddy up the sound too much).

Regarding isolation, being vented, these don’t isolate as much as the ZS5, but put on a bit of music and you feel yourself isolated from the outside world. Even the leakage isn’t bad, so I’d advise these for everyday use more than the ZS5.


Sound

Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Vernee Thor

Files Used – 256 to 320 kbps and FLAC


As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). Nothing too much happened, just a bit of tightening over the lower frequencies and faster response.

We should start by describing their overall sound signature. The sound out of the ZSE is clearly dark with emphasis on the bass, making these a welcomed change from the V shaped sound of the ZS5.

Lets start with the low end. The fact that these are a dual dynamic driver IEM makes you think that most of the emphasis of the sound should be focused towards the lower frequencies… and behold you are right! While the ZSE are not the most responsive nor the most detailed bass producers out there, they can easily bring out some sexy rumble to your ears. The bass goes low, to about 30hz, while having the kick frequencies also emphasized. All in all, these make trap music sound really good, but quicker bass genres might be a tad too much if you want a fast bass decay.

The mids are just alright, since they are a bit recessed due to the overall darker tone of the ZSE. This means that while vocals sound alright, they are harmless and don’t leave you wanting a more intimate experience with the singer. You can listen to acoustic albums, but you will be left wanting that sweet touch of a warmer IEM.

Talking about the treble now, it is once again a bit recessed and harmless which means you can throw pretty much any record at the ZSE and you won’t be hurt due to improper mastering since these are very forgiving of lesser quality records. The cymbals are present but miss any crystalline spark to them, making the treble a “meh” for lack of expression.

Talking now about the soundstage, this is one of their good features, since the vented design allows you to have a sense of width being able to pinpoint the general direction of instruments.

The dual driver design of the ZSE makes them a bit tigher once amped but the overall sound you get out of them doesn’t really justify you carrying an amplifier.

The microphone and controls work pretty well on Android and I don’t have anything bad to say about them.

As for some songs that the KZ ZSE do really well I’ll leave two below:

Aero Chord - Surface – The bass in this song doesn’t really need any introductions and the ZSE pump it out nicely

Kavinsky – Nightcall – The overall slow rhythm of the song fits the ZSE well and the fact that the vocals also have the slow pace makes the ZSE a nice fit

Conclusion

Build Quality: 4/5

Accessories: 2/5

Comfort: 4/5

Isolation: 4/5

Sound Quality (bang for buck): 3.5/5

The ZSE are an excellent choice for this Christmas Bag for everyone around the world. The top down factor, non polarizing sound signature and elevated bass make these a pretty much guaranteed hit with everyone, especially those who listen to lower quality music with sources from YouTube and such, since they are so forgiving. Or you might want to grab these to listen to some audiobooks before bed, due to their amazing format. But if you are looking for purely best bang for your buck in a sound quality area, it just isn’t here. These are dark sounding IEM that you have a lot in this price bracket, but they fail to offer something special like the Monk or even the original ATE offered. These are pretty good to try out, since you can get them for under 10$ all the time. Make these your disposable IEM, I’m sure they will last a while and it doesn’t hurt trying them out!

References

Price: RRP (5.63€) on https://www.gearbest.com/earbud-headphones/pp_689565.html?wid=21&lkid=11752937

I would like to thank Gearbest for the opportunity to review and publish my unbiased opinion about these IEM, it has been a fantastic experience working with you.

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: - Tight, extended bass with crispy treble on top
- Price is amazing
- Removable Cables
Cons: - Mids might be recessed for some
uA4kWwv.jpg


Today I’m here to talk to you about KZ iems. You might already know the brand Knowledge Zenith as one of the primary budget IEM maker from China, made popular mainly by the KZ ATE. Well the model that I have today for reviewing is the KZ ZS5, technically the version 2 from what I read about the sound signature. This is a quad driver per earbud: two dynamic drivers and two balanced armatures, which technically should offer a really good sound on a budget. They also have detachable cables which should improve on the durability.

Technical Data


Talking about technical data and specifications, nothing like using the specifications provided by amazon:

Connectivity : Wired

Application: Apple iOS and Android

Driver: 10mm*2pcs,6.4mm*2pcs

Sensitivity: 106dB

DC resistance: 16 ohms

Frequency range: 20Hz-20000Hz

Maximum power :10mw

Microphone: Have

Cable length: 3.9 foot


All in all some interesting specs, but the lack of official specifications may mean you should look somewhere else for legit info.

YouTube


Packaging

iNZQLhT.jpg


Talking about the packaging, we can clearly see that this is the smaller version used for overseas shipping (since KZ have a bigger one used in the domestic market). Being smaller, we also don’t have anything interesting and on the front part of it we can read the model of the IEM while seeing them.

PgrzXdn.jpg


Seeing them on the back, we have a picture of a brass instrument and the mic logo, which means this is the smartphone compatible version (which has a cable with a microphone and a single button).

fJNwbJb.jpg


Talking about included accessories (excluding the cable, since it is detachable), we have a user guide alongside S/L tips. That’s it really, so nothing to talk home about, it would be good to see at least a hardshell case to carry the ZS5. Anyway this means that the IEM are cheaper, so lets hope the rest of the IEM are well made.


Build Quality and overall look

uA4kWwv.jpg


These are the KZ ZS5 in one of the many available colors. We got the grey ones and as you might be able to notice, we got an housing that’s a bit bulkier than usual, but the normal size for multi driver IEM’s. On the housing we got the Four Drivers image, alongside the ZS5 on the underside of the housing.

g0s2cN7.jpg


Here we have both sides together and we can see a little vent near the right size nozzle (for the dynamic drivers). The housing material is some kind of plastic that has a metalized look to it .

4A4km4J.jpg


This version we received is the mic version, which means the detachable cable included is the one with a microphone (as it would be expected), alongside one button for play/pause.

zTvNiyB.jpg


The 3.5mm gold plated jack is a right angled one, but the most important part is that you can pick any 2 pin cable to pick one to your likings.

NfavpZl.jpg


The nozzle without a tip lets us see that it is quite a lengthy one(in comparison with dynamics), so it might be hard to find tips that retain the original sound. It looks study so it might handle some abuse.

2tzejaH.jpg


The housings have the entrance for these 2 pin cables which I would try and be careful with (and avoid lots of cable changing in order to ensure the connectors last).

2tzejaH.jpg


Here we see the stock cable. The fit with the housing is tight and snug and won’t come out during use.

Overall we are really satisfied with the overall build quality and looks of the ZS5, hopefully they keep on impressing in the remaining areas!


Comfort/Isolation

For a lot of folks that use their sound equipment for long durations during the day, comfort is rated pretty highly on their list, whenever they are looking for some new equipment. Since these are IEM’s, the things that should weigh the most would be the housing shape and weight, alongside the fit you can get with the tips compatible with them.

Regarding weight, I would have to say that while looking at them I was afraid that the KZ ZS5 would be heavier than I thought. I was pleasantly surprised when I put them on with the memory cable and I found out that even during larger sessions I had absolutely no issue with fatigue regarding weight. While they can be worn not over the ear, I really wouldn’t recommend it because they will fall over time. And this is the other issue I have: as time goes by, the insertion is lost a bit so you find yourself readjusting them more often than you would like. This is fixed with the help of some foam tips, for example. The included cable is a bit microphonic for on the go use, but there are custom cables with a lot less microphonics, such as the KZ silver cable, which might be something worth to add while buying these.

Talking about the included tips, they are simple rubber tips that don’t have anything special about them but do their work of keeping the KZ ZS5 inside your ears nicely with a decent seal. This seal really helps make the ZS5 one of the most isolating IEM I’ve used lately, so they might be a bit too isolating if you plan to wear them on a crowded street. This is really nice for places where you need to be concentrated though, such as a library for example.



Sound

Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Vernee Thor

Files Used – 256 to 320 kbps and FLAC

As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). Nothing too much happened, just a bit of tightening over the lower frequencies.

We should start by describing their overall sound signature. While only including silicone eartips, I’ve tried on the KZ ZS5 with foam tips and found out that they attenuate some of the bright highs, for those of you that don’t enjoy a bright sound (think Beyerdynamic). Still, the review will be done with the stock tips both because I think that is fair (you get the IEM as is) and because I enjoy a little extra sparkle in my music (DT990 owner here). The sound out of the KZ ZS5 is v-shaped with the emphasis being more towards the high end of the spectrum than pumping out bass. All in all, a good signature for electronic music and to listen to dakr recordings preferably with quality recording quality.

Lets start with the low end , I was impressed by the sub bass quality of these IEM, most with fast dark electronic genres like psy trance. The bass goes low and doesn’t distort much, although bass kick lovers might be unimpressed because there is more sub bass than the usual midbass. Proper seal is needed for maximum subbass goodness, so make sure you spend some time trying to find the correct tip size. The bass also has some texture to it, although it isn’t the most detailed I’ve heard (but keep in mind you can get these for around 20$).

The mids shine mostly with male vocals and instruments, because there isn’t that intimate touch that you usually have with balanced armature IEM and female vocals (DBA MKII still do vocals like no other). This is due to the mids being slightly recessed and not quite in your face. Even then, strings sound nice and lively with adequate resolution. Comparing with the original KZ ATE which was warmer and sweeter, I’d say that I prefered that more intimate presentation. Still, the ZS5 do mids quite nicely for the price point and for various genres.


Now for the most polarizing part of the ZS5, the treble, I can clearly listen to why it might be a bit much for some. There is definitively a lot of detail for the price, but it is also the most elevated part of the sound spectrum. Cymbals are sparkly and tonal correct, making them really fun for trance and drum and bass. There isn’t enough accuracy overall for orchestral recording because they sound a bit congested due a not broad soundstage. The treble also extends quite high and even if you don’t like it, you can easily EQ it out, or just use foam tips to reduce some harshness. Overall you still get plenty microdetail and way more than you thought it would be possible while remaining musical.


Now the soundstage, like I said, definitively isn’t the widest I’ve heard, making more complex pieces of music sound a bit congested due to lack of space. This is due to the good seal and lack of venting I think, but this isn’t quite a big issue because the amount of space you have is quite accurate in terms of 2D directions.

Bottom line about these KZ ZS5 is that they will handle pretty nicely about anyting you throw at them, but just make sure you don’t mind a treble happy sound. They excel in darker genres of music and make hip hop sound amazing due to their bass capabilities.

Another thing is that I relly found out that the ZS5 benefit being amped, but I’m unsure whether that is due to the weak DAC on my Vernee Thor or just a requirement for them to sound their best. The O2 really brings out some fine details in recordings and makes the ZS5 sound tighter overall.

The microphone addition is decent for people that will be using the ZS5 with smartphones, but I really want to try out the silver cable that KZ offers in the future, because lots of people are saying it improves the sound a lot. In terms of compatibility , the microphone remote worked perfectly with Android smartphones.

As for some songs that the KZ ZS5 do really well I’ll leave two below:

Infected Mushroom – Becoming Insane– With the Sitar notes coming out really crisp through the ZS5's, the quick sub bass never leaves the ZS5 breathing for air, making quite the impact during the track.
Kanye West – Mercy – The bass is once again the main focus of this track and the ZS5's do it flawlessly and when the hats kick in you can really feel the crispness to them (even while not as clear as one would hear in the DT990's).

Conclusion

Build Quality: 4/5

Accessories: 2/5

Comfort: 4/5

Isolation: 4.5/5

Sound Quality (bang for buck): 4.5/5

KZ presents the ZS5 as a major revolution to their lineup (at the time of release, since now you have the ZS6) in order to enter the multi driver IEM arena. With only 20€ you get 4 drivers in each housing, but is more always better? Well you can definitively hear the presence of each one of them, but I still think that two of each might be overkill and just one dynamic and one BA would have been enough if nicely tuned. But all the money went to the drivers because we don't even have a carrying case. Either way, the ZS5 caters to a lot of different music and does just well enough with any of em. I've enjoyed these mostly for psytrance and downtempo or old hip hop instrumentals because the bass weight just packs such a nice punch. These might also interest you if you need IEM with a lot of isolation, due to their form factor and the memory wire to keep them in place.

All in all for 20€ these are an excellent pick if you can handle your high frequencies (so Beyer DT990 fans rejoice), but since we have an ever growing amount of IEM's for this amount of money it becomes a super difficult task to say: "this is the end all of IEM's for this price". So I'll just add my 2 cents and say that for the price you can't really go wrong if you pick these and are looking for tight bass with nice highs (like I said above, a V shaped sound with more emphasis on the highs).

Another end note is to make sure that your phone DAC can drive these well enough, because I found out that these like some amping to sound their best.
And maybe lets hope I get to try the ZS6 because KZ keeps new IEM coming out like they are hot bread!



References

Price: Around 21€ on https://www.gearbest.com/earbud-headphones/pp_668327.html?wid=21&lkid=11655193

I would like to thank Gearbest for the opportunity to review and publish my unbiased opinion about these IEM, it has been a fantastic experience working with you.
nofacemonster
nofacemonster
Amazing review....! thanks a lot.
kiler
kiler
Absolutely no problem man, thanks for reading it :)

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Good build quality / bass that extends down low / good soundstage / absolute killer for the price
Cons: Treble can be too sharp / Questionable Aesthetics
 
Hello! This time I have a completely different review from the ones I’ve been bringing you lately because I’m going to review a full sized headphone! This time we have the Superlux HD681 a full sized circumaural headphone from Taiwan, which reaches on to us with a little help from George from Gearbest! Thank you very much for the chance to review this product and check www.gearbest.com for somewhere to buy this product.
As for a little introduction to the Superlux brand, lets just say that they are a brand with a known reputation for having full size headphones that mimic some popular designs from other brands such as BeyerDynamic or AKG in a much cheaper price. But the catch is the following: they always punch above their weight in terms of sound quality, so this HD681 which can be had for just 20$ will surely surprise a lot of you.
 

Video Review

0.jpg

Technical Data

 
Talking about technical data and specifications, nothing like using the specifications provided by Superlux themselves:
 
 Specifications:
GENERAL
Type headphones
Packaged Quantity 1
Weight 7.8 oz
Additional Features gold-plated plug
ManufacturerAvlex Corporation
 
HEADPHONES
Headphones Type Headphones - binaural
Headphones Form Factor On-ear
Headphones Technology dynamic
Sound Output Mode stereo
Frequency Response 10 - 30000 Hz
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0.25% %
Sensitivity 98 dB
Impedance 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 2 in
Magnet Material neodymium
 
MISCELLANEOUS
Included Accessories headphones pouch
Color Category black
 
 

Packaging

 
1.jpg
2.jpg
 
 
 
 The packaging of the HD681 could be defined as Spartan and it is one that could be used to be in exhibition inside a music store. Its design makes it sit nicely in a stand , and we just have some plastic covering the cardboard where the HD681 sits. On the backside we can read some of the more important specifications of these headphones, but overall we can see that this is where Superlux decided to cut costs. Which should be fine if sound quality doesn’t take a hit.
 
 
 
 

Accessories

 
2_2.jpg
 
 
For a 20$ set of headphones we see that the included accessories aren’t bad: we get a carrying pouch and a 3.5mm to 6.3 mm adapter, which guarantees that the Superlux HD681 fit pretty much any audio systems. Other than that, we don’t have anything else apart from the headphones themselves, so its time to get a better look at the Superlux HD681.
 
 
 

Build Quality and overall look

 
 
3.jpg
 
These are the Superlux HD681. They sport a black and red color scheme and have a semi open design. As you can tell, they have a circumaural design with big ear cups made out of plastic, as is most of their build.
 
 
4.jpg
 
 
 
 
On the right side you can find the Superlux logo, alongside 8 small vents that allow a bit of sound to leak from the cups. You can also read on the black on black letters “professional monitor” which would let us know that these are good for studio monitoring.
 
5.jpg
 
 
 
As we go towards the left side, we can find the name HD681 (this model name), alongside an indication of 2x32 ohm, which tells us that each one of the drivers has 32 ohm of impedance.
 
6.jpg
 
 
The cable is pretty well made and it is terminated with a 3.5mm gold plated plug, but here we see it with the 6.35mm screw on adapter. The rubber coating of it makes it feel really decent and that they will last.
 
7.jpg
 
 
Going for the headband we can find the Superlux name on it, being made of some kind of leather, which is comfortable enough for long term use.
 
8.jpg
 
 
The earpads are made out of cheap pleather, which would easily be my main concern with these headphones. While they are comfortable, they will get warm with long term use. But don’t be afraid since there are lots of aftermarket pads that will fit these headphones, such as the velour replacements sold by the manufacturer.
All in all, the Superlux HD681 present a pretty solid build quality for the price and, since they are studio monitors, I’m sure they will be able to take a beating and don’t break a sweat, since the plastic used is of good quality. But what is a studio monitor without the sound? So we should progress onto the next section which is how good these headphones sound.
 
 
 
 
 

Comfort/Isolation

 
 
Like I’ve said before, these are circumaural headphones, which mean that they will completely go around your ears. These kind of headphones are usually more comfortable than headphones which just sit on top of your ears, and, since these are studio headphones, they need to be comfortable for somewhat long periods of time. The earpads are also really important in terms of comfort, and these are not the best. After two hours they really start to get warm which might make you want to take a break. They also won’t be suitable for people in warmer climates to use during long periods of time, since the pleather isn’t breathable. Other than the fact of warming up, they are super comfortable since they are light and easily adjustable to your head.
As for the isolation, these have a semi-open design, which is a lot more open than some of the open headphones I’ve previously tested , making them have a pretty nice soundstage for the price. There is also a downside to this tho which is that they leak a good amount of sound, so they might not be suitable for public quiet places such as libraries, but they won’t bother someone sitting in the same room as you (in opposite sides). Without music playing you are able to tell what is going on in the room and even with music, if you have a television playing in the same room, you will be able to hear it all. But these are made to be worn in the studio so I’m sure that the semi open design choice was a good one.
 
 

Sound

 
Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Lumia 625, Sandisk Sansa Clip+
 
Files Used –  256 to 320 kbps and FLAC
 
 
 
As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). There wasn’t too much improvement from the burn-in, perhaps the piercing high end was a bit tamed.
 
We are going to start by describing the HD681 overall sound signature. These are a studio headphone and if I had to compare them to any other headphone it would be the german made Beyerdynamic DT990. Both have heavy V-shaped sound signatures with the Superlux managing to have their treble peak in a place that might bother a lot of people more than the DT990 Pro. So I should start by saying that if you don’t like the DT990 cause you find them too bright, you might have to pass (or equalize) the HD681.
 
The HD681 possesses a V Shaped sound with some emphasis on the lower and mid bass, alongside a high-end that might be too sharp for some. This kind of sound makes the HD681 perfect for music that might be bass heavy such as electronic music and rap, falling short on more vocal tracks.
 
Starting with the lower end of the spectrum, I’m really impressed that the sub-bass is present at this extent, which I suppose is due to the big 50mm drivers that really help bring out the rumble. Even though the sub-bass is good, the quantity of bass is mostly centered around 50-100Hz range with some punch in the mid bass as well. The quantity of bass overall is pretty good and spot on with what is needed for a Studio headphone (enough punch and extension).
 
The mids aren’t really where the Superlux headphones shine, mostly because they are the shadow of some really sparkly treble, but they are able to reproduce vocals decently well. Female vocals sound a bit raspy and you can notice it on tracks from artists like Adele. They are missing a bit of range, so to speak, and sound a bit flat.
 
The treble is what really stands out in these headphones, because it is so prominent. It’s even harder to go unnoticed than the so claimed “killer treble” DT990 Pro. I think this is because even though the DT990 has lots of treble, it is a crystalline, pure treble, while the HD681 doesn’t achieve the same level of detail. Even then, the treble is pretty good, even more so if you are able to reduce it in an equalizer in order to bring forward the rest of the sound signature. I say this because while these headphones have a pretty good sound signature, it is hidden under the excessive treble. The excessive treble might also make some bad recordings show all of their flaws, such as noise on old records or low quality (bit-rate wise) ones.
 
Like I said on the isolation part of the review, the fact that they are semi open and leak a bit of sound definitively helps on the soundstage of the HD681, which while detailed and easy to distinguish left and right, is a bit two dimensional. Even then, they are pretty good even to use while gaming.
 
As for improvements while amping, I found out that the bass becomes more pronounced while amped, but even unamped these are pretty solid headphones and the amplifier certainly isn’t a must have.
As for songs that I really enjoyed with these headphones:
Run The Jewels – Legend Has it – El-P is an excellent producer and the sub bass that these put out while amped is really interesting.
Deadmau5 – 4ware – The progressions sound good even with the big amounts of treble and with a good lower end.
 
 

Conclusion

 
Build Quality: 4/5
 
Accessories: 4/5
 
Comfort: 4/5
 
Isolation: 4/5
 
Sound Quality (bang for buck): 5/5
 
The most important thing about the Superlux is that I managed to point out all the flaws as it were a more expensive headphone. And once you put into perspective how much it costs you really wake up to the enormous value of this offering, even though it isn’t the most beautiful or comfortable headphone you can buy. There isn’t anything near the price range (about 20$ in Gearbest) that can offer such a great sound quality and bring joy to your music sessions (barring in ear monitors or earphones). The build quality will also last, which means that the 20$ will most certainly be a wise investment and for the price, even if you hate treble, you should try these out. Worst case scenario you equalize the treble out of them or pass them onto a family member which will surely love your offering. Why get the HD201 if you can get these?
 
 
References
Price: RRP (21.00€) on http://www.gearbest.com/headsets/pp_270782.html?wid=21&lkid=10620793 (this is my affiliate code, if you want to you can buy them without supporting me).
 
I would like to thank Gearbest for the opportunity to review and publish my unbiased opinion about these Headphones, it has been a fantastic experience working with you.

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Build Quality is amazing as always; more acessories than you can do with
Cons: Needs to be EQ'd to get a decent sound out of it
6.jpg

 
Hello guys, today we have another review of a new IEM coming from Brainwavz, this time with another new single dynamic driver IEM, the Brainwavz M100. For those of you that might be worried that you won’t have smartphone capabilities, fear not as Brainwavz has included a neat remote into the cable on the M100. As for some details about them, we got metal housings, which make the M100 really durable, alongside a twisted kind of cable, making it sturdier and better suited to the daily abuse. We also got the usual comply Foam tips included, so let’s see what the M100 can offer!

Technical Data

Talking about technical data and specifications, nothing like using the specifications provided by Brainwavz themselves:

 

 Specifications:

  1. Drivers : Dynamic, 8 mm
  2. Rated Impedance : 32 Ω
  3. Frequency Range : 12 Hz ~ 22 kHz
  4. Sensitivity : 110 dB @ 1 mW
  5. Plug : 3.5 mm, Gold-Plated
  6. Cable : Braided 1.3 m OFC Copper
  7. Remote & Mic: 3 Button, Apple & most Android phones compatible
All in all some interesting specs, specially the reduced driver size.

 

Packaging

1.jpg

 
The packaging that Brainwavz decided to implement with the M100 is absolutely gorgeous. It’s interesting to see that they picked a minimalist approach to the design (with just the black and white), but it just works so well for the box. We got the Brainwavz name placed in a vertical way alongside the M100 name in the top left of the box.

2.jpg

On the side of the box we got a little information about the 24 month warranty from Brainwavz and a little note telling us that we have comply foam tips included in the packaging as well.

3.jpg

 
As you open up the beautiful cardboard box you get a tiny plastic tray where you find a Brainwavz Carrying case and nothing else. You might be wondering where all the accessories are included, but a little peek into the case will reveal it…

4.jpg

 
Well this little carrying case sure can store a lot of stuff! All the included accessories are pictured above, and we have: the M100 In-Ear Headphones, 6 pairs of eartips, 1 pair of Comply T400 Foam tips and one user guide. All in all, Brainwavz never disappoints regarding accessories and packaging.

Accessories

5.jpg

 
As we start to glance over the included accessories, we can notice that inside the plastic bag there were 6 tips, which, adding the ones already installed in the M100, make 7 pairs of ear tips. Looking at the picture we can easily conclude that in all the packaging we have 2 pairs of each size (S, M and L) alongside one extra pair of Bi-Flange Eartips. And, for the T400, these are already really well known by everyone visiting head-fi, so I’ll skip them and you’ll probably see why in the sound section below. Pro tip? They don’t exactly help the sonic signature of the M100.

Build Quality and overall look

7.jpg

 
These are the housings of the Brainwavz M100, as you can see the metal really helps making these look sturdy alongside the really well made strain reliefs. The added weight isn’t really that noticeable even more so if you wear them over your ear which reduces the weight even more. The 8mm driver also helps reducing the overall housing size.

 

8.jpg

 
Going down the cable(which is twisted and gives it a nice texture), we can find the remote that we’ve previously found in some other Brainwavz models and that offers a really sturdy touch and smartphone (both Apple and Android) capability. On the remote you can also find the microphone in case you want to use these during a call.

9.jpg

 
Talking now about the Y-Split it is as sturdy as the ones you have previously found in Brainwavz models with the addition of a little Logo on it. We also got a chin slider in order to adjust cable length above this split.

10.jpg

 
We have now reached the end of the cable which is terminated with a 45 degree angled TTRS gold plated plug, as usual in smartphone compatible IEM. This angled plug provides more durability compared to the usual 0 or 90 degree jacks.

Everything seems to be as sturdy as it usually is with Brainwavz products so lets see what their comfort is all about.

 

Comfort/Isolation

For a lot of folks that use their sound equipment for long durations during the day, comfort is rated pretty highly on their list, whenever they are looking for some new equipment. Since these are IEM’s, the things that should weigh the most would be the housing shape and weight, alongside the fit you can get with the tips compatible with them.

While one could think that the M100 would be quite a heavy IEM due to its metal construction, further inspection upon having it on your hand you can tell that it is a thin (still sturdy) metal that doesn’t add that much weight to it. Obviously they won’t be as unobtrusive as some small Philips SHE3590, but they are really comfortable. The only downside from them comes in the form of a little driver flex that might be present upon inserting the M100 too deep which might prevent you from getting the best sound (or might prevent you from getting any sound at all). Other than that, pretty good comfort even more so with the Comply tips, even though they don’t help the M100 sound signature at all.

As for isolation these have about the same isolation as the S5 IEM, which means that without music you will dim the outside noise and with music you won’t be able to hear them (except for maybe, really loud subway noises), so these are advisable to use where you need good isolation, but if you need to be somewhat aware of your environment you should pick something else (as you should never use an IEM, except for maybe vented ones, in those environments). The Comply Foam tips also help isolate a tiny bit more.

 

Sound

Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Lumia 625, Sandisk Sansa Clip+, Ruizu X06

Files Used –  256 to 320 kbps and FLAC

6.jpg

 
As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). The 8mm dynamic driver felt a bit tighter overall, but nothing super dramatic.

We should start by describing their overall sound signature. You need to think that the eartips you choose influence the sound a lot and for my review I have used the standard M flanges because these provided the best balance of seal and low driver flex. The sound out of the M100 is really, really dark, with a sound signature that could be described as bass heavy and with highs so dull that they couldn’t even cut a piece of already cut paper.

 

Lets start with the low end. This is what gives the M100 its characteristic sound, they have a really thick low end that extends quite well with a decent rumble and tightness. The problem comes with the little mid bass hump that just muddies the sound. The kicks sounds good, but still overall the presentation doesn’t suit most of the music. The 8 mm driver still carries an interesting rumble that suits mostly bass-heavy electronic music, but doesn’t really work anywhere else. Tracks like “Aero Chord – Surface” make the M100 shine, but for anything acoustic or less bass heavy it just doesn’t work.

The mids  are warm and kinda recessed due to the mid bass hump, even though voices still sound lovely when they aren’t being covered by bass. As you might have been seeing with my comments, the technical quality of the M100 is there, but they are shadowed by the mid bass hump and the lack of treble spark. Even then all voices sound good when properly equalized, which I shall talk about later.

Talking about the treble now, what treble actually? There is none and the one that is there rolls off quite early. The cymbals are accurate but they are way too recessed, I don’t know what Brainwavz were thinking when they were engineering the overall sound signature, because the M100 can be made so much more interesting with just a little bit of equalizing.

Talking now about the soundstage, once you uncover the mess made by the mid bass and lower mids you will find a surprisingly dynamic soundstage which is accurate as well (but nothing like vented IEM).

While Brainwavz tells us that these gained by being amped, the bulkiness added by an amp (as these are marketed as mobile IEM) isn’t worth the tiny bit better sound that is produced while amped.

The main thing to bring the best of out the M100 is definitively Equalization. You will have to bring down the mid bass region and up the Highs, which should look something like this:

-1 dB at 60Hz

-4 dB at 200Hz

-2 dB at 600Hz

0 dB at 1kHz

+3 dB at 4kHz

+5 dB at 8kHz

+6 dB at 12kHz

With these setting I find that the M100 become much more versatile in different genres of music and these setting allow to unleash the real potential of the M100’s . Every ounce on detail that can be squeezed out of them is now fully capable to be heard, making these now more capable to actually have a sparkle for treble! Rock is now much more enjoyable, even old school trance now delights you with snares.

As for the smartphone addons that we have with the M100 I’m gonna start by stating that the remote on the right side of the cable is really easy to use and the buttons let you know exactly when you pressed them, with an actuation force that will make really hard for you to press them when you don’t mean it. As for compatibility, on my BQ Aquaris X5 I’ve experienced that you can pretty much use every functionality of them and on my Lumia 625 I could also do that, which means these should have a pretty wide compatibility device-wise!

As for the microphone it has a pretty good quality, just about the one you would expect from such a device.

Conclusion

Build Quality: 4/5

Accessories: 4/5

Comfort: 3/5

Isolation: 4/5

Sound Quality (bang for buck): 2.5/5

Brainwavz always manages to impress with its overall build quality and aesthetic but the sound quality always seems to not be up to par with the rest of the package. The M100 are really held back by its sound signature, but with a little tweak you are able to get the best out of them. Even then, for its price, the M100 aren’t the best sound for the price. They do really well in the build quality, accessory and finish department so I think if you want to give them to someone that can tweak the sound quality (i.e. use an equalizer), these might be a nice gift. Else, with their default sound signature, they will just please hard bass EDM lovers.

 The M100 can be good if they are reworked for a more neutral sound signature, but until then it is kinda hard to recommend them.
 
References
 
Price: RRP (85.00€) on http://www.brainwavzaudio.com/products/brainwavz-m100-earphones
I would like to thank Brainwavz for the opportunity to review and publish my unbiased opinion about these IEM, it has been a fantastic experience working with you.
  • Like
Reactions: HiFiChris
HiFiChris
HiFiChris
@kiler I was very inclined to use that Meghan Trainor song text line in my review as well but decided not to do it although one of the very early associations that popped up in my head was exactly that line from the refrain of that particular song.
kiler
kiler
@HiFiChris After a lot of pondering and listening to these I just decided that it was the perfect fit for their sound sig :D Glad to see great minds think alike ^^ 

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Bass is really good for the price; Build quality for the price; Includes Comply Foam Tips
Cons: Mids are lacklustre
Hello, once again I’m here to talk with you about an interesting set of IEM. This time we have a really interesting rework of an existing Brainwavz model, the S5! And why is this a rework? Well because with this updated version Brainwavz decided that it would be interesting to add a remote to their already pretty well known S5 IEM. While the remote only grants full compatibility with iOs devices, the addition of it is pretty neat, because it allows you to take control of your music on the go. They also have packaged Comply Foam tips as an added bonus, so we think this package will be really interesting to have a look at.

Hello once again! I bring you today something that will try and get your feet tapping from Brainwavz, the Brainwavz Jive! These one of the entry level offer from Brainwavz that has been updated recently to include smartphone capabilities, just like the S5 I have previously  reviewed, making these compatible with all Android smartphones (iOs versions are also available). For a relatively affordable price, the Jive offer metal housings and Comply foam tips as accessories, so I think that just for that they deserve some spotlight!

 

Video 

0.jpg


Technical Data

 

Talking about technical data and specifications, nothing like using the specifications provided by Brainwavz themselves:

 Specifications:

·         Drivers : Dynamic, 9 mm

·         Rated Impedance : 16 Ω

·         Frequency Range : 20 Hz ~ 20 kHz

·         Sensitivity : 98 dB @ 1 mW

·         Rated Input Power : 20 mW

·         Plug : 3.5 mm, Gold-Plated

·         Cable : 1.3 m, Copper 

Packaging

1.jpg

 
The packaging that Brainwavz chose for the Jive certainly stands out, specially because it is made out of plastic. Here we can see that the main focus of the packaging are the Jive themselves, with a special note that each version of the Jive (color) has a picture of that same color on the packaging, alongside details on the same color (for example, where the accents in this red version are red, on the green version they are green). On the front we also see that the fact of these being Android compatible is noteworthy.

2.jpg

 
On the side of the packaging we can find the mention of these including Comply Foam Tips, alongside the 12 month warranty provided by Brainwavz. We also have links for Brainwavz Social Media pages.

3.jpg

 
On the backside we can find some information about the Jive in ear monitors, alongside the specifications and the contents we have in this packaging. All in all really interesting, specially once you realize that the real package is the included carrying case, because everything comes packaged inside it!

Accessories

4.jpg

 
Here we can see what is included with the Brainwavz Jive. As always, and as is Brainwavz tradition, we have a complete set of accessories that almost make worth to buy the Jive just for for them. On the top we have an elongated version of the usual Brainwavz case (which just means more space for IEM and tips, but probably less for DAP’s). Starting from the left (and excluding the obvious Jive!), we have a shirt clip, S and L pair of tips (the M are already installed on the IEM), a manual, a velcro cord cinch, the Comply Foam Tips (the S-400) and we also have a pretty cool Brainwavz sticker! All in all, great accessories included, so lets zoom in on the Jive.

 

Build Quality and overall look

6.jpg

 
These are the Brainwavz Jive, sporting metal (I probably would say it is aluminum) housings with the brand name on one side and the side indicator on the other. We can see that they seem to be really well finished and have eartips to match the housing color. The strain relief on the housing seems well finished, with enough give to let the cable flex.

5.jpg

 
Like said before, here we can see that the housings sport right and left indicators written on them, that while visible, lack a tactile feedback. This would be an issue if the Jive did not have a microphone and on cable remote, that is positioned on the left side of the cable, which helps us distinguish between both housing sides easily.

7.jpg

 
8.jpg
 
Talking about the remote and on cable microphone, we can see that they use the same “Bordeaux” color of the cable, with the remote being simple but effective to use (the usual tap to play and double tap to skip songs).

The microphone is located on the back of this remote, sporting a pretty decent sound quality.

9.jpg

 
Speaking now of the jack, here we have a 45 degree angled jack which isn’t what I would have chosen (either go 90 degree or just straight), but the jack is well finished with a TRRS gold plated 3.5mm jack. The cable is really good under the Y split and what could be considered a bit too thin above it, but I’m sure it can take abuse due to its rubber-like coating on the outside.

All in all, pretty good quality for the under 30$ price bracket that the Jive insert themselves in, so lets see if they can punch their weight in sound quality. 

Comfort/Isolation

10.jpg

 
For a lot of folks that use their sound equipment for long durations during the day, comfort is rated pretty highly on their list, whenever they are looking for some new equipment. Since these are IEM’s, the things that should weigh the most would be the housing shape and weight, alongside the fit you can get with the tips compatible with them.

On the Jive case even though they are made out of a metal, these are pretty comfortable to use either hanging from your ear or just used with the cable behind the ear. Due to their format, they can be used those ways and you probably will feel comfortable, even with the larger nozzles. The stock tips might have a feeling of too much stiffness that can be solved with either using the provided Comply Foam Tips or even using the Sony Hybrid Clones (which I really enjoy the tonality that they confer to these IEM). About the driver flex, there is a bit of it with the stock tips but I didn’t find them to suffer from it with the Comply Tips.

Talking about isolation, the Jive isolate you decently, a little bit less than the S5 we have reviewed earlier, but with the Comply tips the amount of isolation goes up even without music. Without music you can hear talks in the room you are currently standing in, but with music the outside noise is totally muffled out, which make these a perfect companion for your commute.

 

Sound

Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Lumia 625, Sandisk Sansa Clip+

Files Used –  256 to 320 kbps and FLAC

11.jpg

 
As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). I’ve noticed an overall tightened sound from these after burn in (Specially in the lower frequency area).

We should start by describing their overall sound signature. If I had to describe the sound signature of the Jives, it would be a slightly accentuated V shape, making these a really interesting buy for those of you that are electronic (or just pop) music lovers on the go. Brainwavz made some bold claim that these will sound vaguely resembling of a Balanced armature driver and I can see how they would say such a thing (except these have a lot more sub bass).

Much like the previously reviewed S5, eartip choice (which isn’t as vast in this case as the ones in the S5 case) will definitively impact the sound signature. Using the comply foam tips provided will make these sound warmer with the cost of a bit of treble, but I found the sweet spot with these being the Sony Hybrid-like tips, that make the sound just a tiny bit more midcentric, due to treble reduction (less than the one obtained with the Comply tips). Still, my impressions will be with the stock tips because the Hybrid tips weren’t included and I think that is the sound signature more of my liking.

Starting with the low end , we can really feel a textured sub-bass, not in the extreme low-end, but in the 20-100 hz range, which means the bass can possess a nice rumble (while not the most textured), avoiding having too much bass in the mid-bass range which could bleed into the mids. You still get a decent kick out of them, so everything with a good bass chord progression will sound really decent.

The mids are where once again the Brainwavz fail to be more detailed, I would have liked a bit more presence in the voices  that can sound a bit thin at times , but still retaining a lot of detail. Like I said before these are a V shaped headphone and you can definitively listen to the forwardness of the upper midrange, making some cymbals sound harsh due to lack of resolution, that also help confer some space to the overall sound signature. With more complex orchestral sounds, you might find that adding to thin, the midrange might feel a bit congested and with a lack of detail.

As for the treble, like I said before there is a forwardness to it, that might not be to the liking of many, specially because while forward, it isn’t the one with more resolution or extension out of all similarly priced IEM (from memory, the Piston 3 did this better). Even then, it confers some airiness to the overall signature, that goes well with the good quality low end.

The soundstage of the Jives is definitively one of their strong suits, mostly in width, because the imaging is quite lacking due to dull mids. Even then, the soundstage might make them really good for those of you that want like to use IEM while gaming.

I didn’t notice any noticeable improvement with amping the Jives, which is to be expected, because no one in that price point would probably use a DAC or Amp other than the one included in their smartphone.

In terms of compatibility, being that these are the Android version, I haven’t experienced any kind of issues with my BQ Aquaris X5, which was to be expected really. But it was a nice surprise to see that they work just as fine with my Windows Mobile device, a Lumia 625

As for compatibility, on my BQ Aquaris X5 I’ve experienced that you can pretty much use every functionality of them and on my Lumia 625 I could also do that, which means these should have a pretty wide compatibility device-wise!

The microphone quality will be posted in the video review that is coming soon.

As for some songs that the Brainwavz Jive do really well I’ll leave two below:

Chicane  – Saltwater –  The V-shaped sound signature makes this trance classic sound just perfect.

Taylor Swift – Shake it off – The Jives are also really well suited for pop music, just make sure you get a good quality recording (192 kbps or more) because lower quality youtube rips will make you suffer a bit due to harsh treble.

Conclusion

Build Quality: 4.5/5

Accessories: 4/5

Comfort: 4/5

Isolation: 4/5

Sound Quality (bang for buck):3.5/5

The Jives aren’t the best sounding IEM’s that you can get for the price, but one thing is certain: you probably won’t get as good of a package with any other offering in the same price range. And it isn’t just the packaging that is top notch, the build quality is also really interesting, because having an aluminum build with a decent cable and cable controls is something to be praised. The sound signature will surely be suited for the mainstreams genres (especially with future bass becoming more and more mainstream, which is a genre the Jives master really well), and they won’t need any special amping for you to get all that the Jive can offer. And for that, bearing in mind that sometimes Brainwavz makes these even cheaper than the MSRP, I’m pretty sure every one of you should try the Jives out.

 
References
Price: RRP (28.00$) on http://www.brainwavzaudio.com/collections/jive-series
I would like to thank Brainwavz for the opportunity to review and publish my unbiased opinion about these IEM, it has been a fantastic experience working with you.
  • Like
Reactions: crabdog

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Acessories, built in remote, bass has some nice rumble to it
Cons: Flat cable will become bothersome, a tiny bit of grain on the upper mids
IMG_1048.jpg

 
Hello, once again I’m here to talk with you about an interesting set of IEM. This time we have a really interesting rework of an existing Brainwavz model, the S5! And why is this a rework? Well because with this updated version Brainwavz decided that it would be interesting to add a remote to their already pretty well known S5 IEM. While the remote only grants full compatibility with iOs devices, the addition of it is pretty neat, because it allows you to take control of your music on the go. They also have packaged Comply Foam tips as an added bonus, so we think this package will be really interesting to have a look at.

 

Unboxing and video review
 
0.jpg

 
Technical Data

 

Talking about technical data and specifications, nothing like using the specifications provided by Brainwavz themselves:

 Specifications:

  1. Transducers/Drivers: Dynamic, 10 mm
  2. Drivers: Dynamic, 10 mm
  3. Rated Impedance: 16 Ω
  4. Frequency Range: 18 Hz ~ 24 kHz
  5. Sensitivity: 110 dB at 1 mW
  6. Rated Input Power: 20 mW
  7. Cable: 1.3 m Y-Cord, Copper
  8. Plug: 3.5 mm, Gold Plated
All in all some interesting specs, that I’m sure will translate to some amazing performance.

 

Packaging

1.jpg

This is the packaging that Brainwavz decided to use for the S5, in which we can see the detail that the IEM itself has on the front of the case. It is really interesting to indicate the fact that on the top left we can find an indication about the inclusion of the remote and the Comply foam tips. On the lower part of the case we can find the name of the brand and some sentences about the capabilities of the S5.

2.jpg

 
What you might have not noticed is that the front part of the case opens up to reveal some interesting stuff about the IEM itself, alongside giving a first view to the carrying case. On the left we can see more information about the IEM construction and the Comply T-Series foam tip, while on the right side we have more information on how to use the included microphone.

3.jpg

 
On the side we have some information about the 24 month warranty from Brainwavz and some information about their social media (facebook and twitter, so go pay them a visit).

4.jpg

 
The backside, as always, is where things get interesting. We have a small description of the Brainwavz S5, alongside the contents and accessories of this packaging, where we can also find some specifications and the compatibility for the 3.5mm jack. 

Accessories

5.jpg

 
Now to talk about the included accessories: once you open the box, you find this plastic tray where, on the bottom, you will find the case for the S5 (where they sit snuggly inside, with a plastic clip as well), and on the top you will find the comply T-Series foam tips and all the tip goodies from Brainwavz.

6.jpg

 
If you want to see all the accessories laid out, this is your chance. On the left you can find the included Comply Foam Tips T-400 (of M size). Next to it you can find the triflange tips, alongside the Brainwavz s-sized tip. The next three tips are, respectively, the S, M and L size of the Sony Hybrid clones , that many people seem to praise (I actually also really like them). On the right side of it you can find the L size of the Brainwavz tip, and, to finish, the last tip is a Bi-Flange tip. On the right side of all the tips you find the shirt clip, and you also find a Velcro tie making sure the S5 don’t untangle themselves during the shipping. You also get a Users Guide in the case. The only thing missing here, that you have already seen is the carrying case.

This is it for the accessory part of this review, but I think this has set us up for something really interesting from Brainwavz.

 

Build Quality and overall look

7.jpg

These black beauties are the Brainwavz S5, here in all their splendor. You might not be able to tell, but the housing is actually made out of metal, which means they will take quite a beating and definitively give them a premium feeling. This is impressive because while they weight a tiny bit more than the common housing, this doesn’t give the user any extra fatigue due to added weight.
The only mention of model in here is the Brainwavz engraved in the side that will be facing the outside of your ear, and a little side engraving on the strain relief.

8.jpg

 
The main addition to this renewed version of the S5 is most definitively the added microphone and remote, which make the S5 more appealing to all the smartphone users. As we can see here we will find the microphone in the left side of the flat cable above the Y-split. The buttons are sensitive to touch and you can clearly feel when you press them.

9.jpg

 
Regarding the Y-Split, you can find a Brainwavz logo in there, also here we see two of the strain reliefs that are used in these flat cables, that look sturdy, but we have to remember that flat cables are prone to more stress than round cables (at least I think so).

10.jpg

 
The flat cable is then terminated with a 4 pole 3.5mm jack, common to all the earphones that also possess controls and microphones. Once again, Brainwavz took the care to try and make a good strain relief, but as always, flat cables are more prone to break (not that is an issue, specially with Brainwavz 24 month warranty).

11.jpg

 
To end the quality part, I really want to focus on the fact that Brainwavz really tried to make everything sturdy, so lets hope that the sound is up to par as well!

 

Comfort/Isolation

For a lot of folks that use their sound equipment for long durations during the day, comfort is rated pretty highly on their list, whenever they are looking for some new equipment. Since these are IEM’s, the things that should weigh the most would be the housing shape and weight, alongside the fit you can get with the tips compatible with them.

In this case we have to say that while the S5 could be considered a hefty IEM (due to metal housing), using it over the ear can really take out any extra weight you might “feel”. But for those that prefer using it top down, you can also do it (being extra comfortable if you switch left and right housings, but you will need to invert the channels in your DAP as well). While the flat cable isn’t the best to wear over your ear and is a bit microphonic, it is still quite comfortable.


As for the included tips, the comfort is the best with the included Comply Foam tips, as it is to be expected, because foam tips are on a level of their own. But even with the included silicone tips, you will find the S5 really comfortable (except for the tri-flanges, but even with those, I think that they make the S5 sound too distant, but I’ll talk about that later on).

Regarding isolation, once again you have the best results with silicone tips or the comply ones, because that’s the way you get the best seal. Even without music you muffle really well your environment, so with music you can probably ride the subway without noticing the noise that much.

 

Sound

Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Lumia 625, Sandisk Sansa Clip+, BQ Aquaris X5

Files Used –  256 to 320 kbps and FLAC

 

As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). The 10mm dynamic driver felt a bit tighter on the lower frequencies after the burn in.

We should start by describing their overall sound signature. You need to think that the eartips you choose influence the sound a lot and for my review I have used the bi-flanges and the Comply Foam Tips the most. The sound out of the S5 is almost flat, with just a tiny bit elevated bass and treble, with really interesting vocals.

Lets start with the low end produced by these babies. I really think that even while it is slightly elevated, this is mostly on the mid bass, which helps them give their sound a fuller body, so to speak. Even then, with a proper seal, the bass can extend to low frequencies, making these a nice choice for those of you that enjoy a good EDM experience, while not having overbearing bass for other genres of music. Some of you would probably enjoy a faster bass decay in case you listen to a lot of live music, but on some drum and bass you can clearly follow the bass drums. The bass texture is there and the 10mm driver sure helps moving some air, but it isn’t something to talk wonders about, but the added low end sure will give an added oomph to all kinds of genres.

IMG_1168.jpg

 
The mids are natural and right where they should be, being followed up by the bass really nicely. The body that is given to the music by the bass, makes the mids shine, sounding really natural, except for the little gap between upper mids and treble, where a tiny spike might make things sound a bit unnatural in certain tracks where the vocals are almost the only focus (like acoustic recordings). This can be lessened with the use of Comply Foam tips that also reduce the treble a bit.

 

Talking about the treble now, like I said before, it is a tiny bit elevated which also makes them a bit more fun sounding (at least for me). Unfortunately it is elevated while not having quite that kind of resolution that a BA driver can, neither extending as far. Even then, it still provides a fun experience that can, like said before, be attenuated with the use of comply foam tips, in case you listen to a certain genre that has badly mastered music or you just aren’t a fan of treble elevations.

Talking now about the soundstage, it is pretty wide, maybe a tiny bit less wide than the one in the Shozy Zero, but still pretty big an IEM. Its accuracy is also pretty good, and it feels airy due to forward treble, but nothing too exceptional. You can pinpoint instruments in a 2D kind of way, with great precision, being the separation really good unless you throw something really complex at them.

My end thoughts would be to use the double flanges if you want more air in your music and don’t mind the forward treble and to use the Comply for those cases where you want a darker sound.

 

I think that the S5 gain a bit by being amped, producing a wider soundstage and a tiny bit more of detail and resolution when comparing to them unamped.

As for the smartphone addons that we have received with this iteration of the S5, I’m gonna start by stating that the remote on the left side of the cable is really easy to use and the buttons let you know exactly when you pressed them, with an actuation force that will make really hard for you to press them when you don’t mean it. As for compatibility, on my BQ Aquaris X5 I’ve experienced that you can pretty much use every functionality of them and on my Lumia 625 I could also do that, which means these should have a pretty wide compatibility device-wise!

As for the microphone it has a pretty good quality and I will update with a sample when the final video review is posted in here.

As for some songs that the Brainwavz S5 do really well I’ll leave two below:

Deadmau5  – Strobe – The synths and ever growing tempo just produce an electric rush through you that the S5 reproduce really well, mostly to the added punch on the low end.

BT – Skylarking – Once again, electronic music proves to be where these can shine, making progressions sound pretty good, alongside the heightened bass.

 

 

Conclusion

Build Quality: 4/5

Accessories: 4/5

Comfort: 4/5

Isolation: 4/5

Sound Quality (bang for buck): 4/5

Brainwavz presents the updated S5 to cater to the ever growing music listening smartphone user. The added capabilities that the remote offer (the playback and volume control), alongside the mic make the S5 a sure choice to gift to your family. The sound signature will surely be up to any challenge you give them, and the slight emphasis on both ends of the spectrum will make sure these won’t sound boring even for those less versed in this area. The only way that Brainwavz could make these even more friendly would be to change the flat cable which is just too bulky for my taste and I think, like I said times and times again during this review, will probably stress the strain reliefs way too much.

 

The added accessories also help these Brainwavz S5 feel like a premium product, because there are just a lot of fitting options that will ensure you will find the perfect fit.

In the end, while sonically the Brainwavz S5 won’t be something that is supposed to punch above their price, I’m sure that many will find charming the way it wants to be just a good all-rounder that can be driven off your smartphone with a good quality, making sure that all of your playlist sounds good on the go. And for that, I think that it is our duty to end this review with a positive note about this S5, Brainwavz took their old success with the S5 and updated it for the current market, why change something that does its duty so well?

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Metal construction, 24 months warranty, can fit 2 headphones
Cons: Might be limited for one application
0.jpg

 
Here you have my Brainwavz Hooka review, an excellent headphone stand for the price!

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Awesome soundstage, good musicality, price that can't be beat
Cons: Treble on these might not be to the liking of some (without foam covers)
0.jpg

 
I did this little review, if a written review is needed, I might put the time and effort into it 

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Great Bass, amazing soundstage, wooden housings are really interesting
Cons: Could use some acessories, not for treble lovers
Introduction

Hello, today we have something really interesting coming from a relatively new brand from China, Shozy. You might have already heard of them from their amazing DAP the Alien Gold. For those of you that love wood, you will most certainly love the new Shozy Zero IEM. Alongside the gorgeous rosewood housings you also have a wood Y splitter, and a wooden jack. Already interested in these? You will have to read the rest to find out how they fare in what matters the most: sound quality!

 
0.jpg


Technical Data

The unit I have with me of the Shozy Zero is still a pre-production unit, so details might not be final. As for driver size we can count with … mm driver with …ohms of impedance. Their sensitivity is xxxdB/mW and a frequency response of xxHz-xxkHz. Their cable length is measured at xxm with a 3.5mm gold plated jack made out of rosewood! Their overall weight is xxg, making these a pleasure to use on the go.

  

Accessories

 



 

Since this is a pre-production unit I’ve skipped the packaging part of my review since they arrived with what you see above. We can count with the Shozy Zero itself, alongside 3 pairs of tips of small, medium and large size. The tips are fairly well finished, so there is not much to talk about in here.

Build Quality



Shozy is really interested in making sure that the Zero stand out in their price bracket (around 50$) so in order to give them something different, they decided to build the housings out of rosewood, alongside the splitter and jack. Looking up close on the housing we can see that the back part is made our of wood and the nozzle is made out of metal.



A closer look on the housing lets us see that on the back of the strain reliefs we have the indication of which side is which. Also the strain relief makes sure that the Shozy Zero will last a bit longer (even though I feel that it is a bit on the thinner side).



Speaking of the cable they used, we can find a rubbery cable that looks quite a lot like the one used in the KZ ATEs, for those of you that are familiar with them. We can also find the name zero on the backside of the wooden Y-Split.

Looking at the jack now, we find the Shozy brand name engraved into it, alongside a tiny stress relief made out of rubber.

Overall I really enjoy the vintage feel provided by these wooded IEM, and the fact that all the wooden parts are covered with some kind of lacquer in order protect them from wear. Even then, I’d recommend a carrying case to make sure they last a while.

One thing is for sure, they will stand out and look cool, so I think Shozy really nailed the look they were striving for.

 

Comfort/Isolation

One of the most interesting points about using IEM’s, and after my venture with earbuds (VE Monks, FiiO EM3, for example) is how much I prefer the snug fit of a tiny IEM inside my ear canal. Well, the relatively small size of the Shozy Zero make these a great fit, I just needed to find the perfect size tip of those included (which ended up being a medium), and then you pop it in with absolutely no effort. I don’t know if it was second nature, but I found out that using these over the ear was my preferred method of using them, reducing the microphonics of what would be a microphonic cable. Using them this way also allows for the cable to be out of the way, even though they stay secure while using them cable down. Due to the tight fit, one might also feel a tiny bit of suction while putting them on, but this just means a tighter seal, making these sweet low frequencies stand out like they should (what I mean by this is that a bad seal usually makes out for drowned out lower frequencies).

As for the isolation these have a pretty nice isolation, probably due to the nice seal, so you can easily block out outside sounds (like conversations) just by putting them on, and heavier environment noises by putting on some music at your listening volume.

Like referred above, microphonics could be an issue while wearing them straight down, but using them over ear reduces the problem by a lot.

 

Sound

Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Mlais M52 Red Note

Files Used –  256 to 320 kbps and FLAC

As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). I found out that they got relatively more tamed than when I first used them (first time listening to these I thought the bass was kinda boomy).

We should start by describing their overall sound signature. If I could describe the Shozy Zero in a word it would be : “thick”, in a good way, obviously.



 

Starting off with the low end, you can clearly notice that, with the stock tips, there is a bias for bass. And it is not exactly bad, since it is a good articulate bass with a deep extension that also decays fast enough. One thing is for sure, these make Deep Trance, Trap and Rap sound absolutely delightful, while being still amazing for other less bass heavy genres. Basslines sound tight and visceral, so you can probably imagine how good Gorillaz and Queen sound on these.

Due to a large soundstage, mids don’t feel congested at all even with the accentuated bass. You can listen really well to detailed vocals, they just feel a tad behind the instrumental. They are still good choices for live versions of songs due to the nice soundstage and imaging. Pianos and guitars also sound quite good with a correct timbre to them.

The highs is the place where they might feel a bit rolled off, but this isn’t a bad thing at all because the lesser emphasis on these higher frequencies make these easier to use during long sessions of music, making them really non fatiguing. The treble is still there, is just feels like it takes a backseat (even more so than mids). What you can hear of it still is detailed, and I’m sure it makes the Shozy Zero much more forgiving of bad quality audio.

Now, onto the soundstage, that I have been mentioning over and over again in this review, because it is simply amazing, how one could make small IEM’s with a soundstage this big, even more so when they seal so well as the Zero do. And it isn’t just the soundstage that is amazing, it is the positional accuracy of the sounds as well. I would compare it to the Xiaomi Piston 3, perhaps a tad bit wider, it really is that good.

As for some songs that the Shozy Zero do really well I’ll leave two below:

 

Taylor Swift – I know Places – Her voice just blends in the amazing instrumental, like I said above these are really interesting for pop music.

Gorillaz – On Melancholy Hill – The bass line goes along really well, alongside the vocals that just sound great on these EM3 (but the song is great already on its own).

 As for a quick comparison with the Monk, the Monk is more spacious (the soundstage is absolutely fabulous) and tuned towards a more musical sound, as the EM3 sound more comercial and tuned for the general crowd.

Conclusion

Build Quality: 4/5

Comfort: 4/5

Isolation: 4/5

Sound Quality (bang for buck): 4.5/5

The Shozy Zero is Shozy first venture into IEM territory and I think they did it really well! They managed to offer an IEM with a premium feel to it (I really enjoyed the rosewood housings) and that will surely punch above its MSRP (50$). The sound these produce is really musical and with an amazing soundstage for IEM’s, which make these one of the best picks you could possibly get under 100$.

In what regards to build quality, they might feel a little bit fragile due to their small form factor, but provided you store them in adequate conditions (so a carrying case in the final product could be a nice accessory ).

As said above, you will need to able to enjoy a thicker sound, with a bit pronounced bass, but if you are looking for IEM’s with that kind of sound signature, you can’t really go wrong with the Zero and they will probably become my main IEM.

 

References

Price: RRP (50$) 

The review will be updated soon with pictures

vapman
vapman
I am a little confused because your title is "A bass lovers delight", pros has "great bass", but cons has "not for bass lovers"? I am a bit unclear on how you view the Zero's bass.
kiler
kiler
Nicely pointed out, it was a mistake, I meant treble lovers :) 

kiler

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Warm sound will cater for those non audiophiles looking for a bit more warmth in their earbuds; Added functionality from the built in remote;
Cons: Included foams make the sound muddy
Introduction

 
Hello guys, today I’m writing about a really interesting set of earbuds. They are inexpensive, have a microphone and some controls in their cable. The brand that produce these is also really well known to all headfiers, the brand being FiiO! You might be wondering, but does FiiO make earbuds? Well this is their first venture into this market and they are trying to take it by storm with an in-house design that will also go along some of their DAP's. Lets see how the FiiO EM3 fares in our tests.

You can also have a look in my youtube down below.

0.jpg


Technical Data

 The technical data about these FiiO EM3 is the following: we can count with a 14.8mm driver which has about 47 ohms of impedance. They have a sensitivity of 109dB/mW and a frequency response of 20Hz-20kHz (about the normal). As for their cable, we can count with 1.2m of cord length ended with a 3.5mm angled and gold plated jack. All this comes in a package (the EM3 is) of about 13.6g, making these really light.

 

Packaging



 
The packaging that FiiO decided to use for the EM3 reflects their choice to keep the price low. We are presented a cardboard box that has a nice touch to it. On the front side we can see a picture of the black EM3, alongside a picture of the brand logo on the top left of the case. There is also an interesting detail of what seems to be a soundwave coming from top to bottow and the model name EM3 on the bottom of the front.

2.jpg

 
On the backside, we have some specifications about the EM3, together with some QR codes that lead us to some of FiiO’s social media and website.

The box seems fairly decent for the price that the EM3 cost, so let’s see what is inside!

 

Accessories

 

3.jpg

 
It is expected for the accessories to be a bit on the low side, in order to reduce the price of these. And that’s perfectly fine, as we find 3 pairs of sponges to help cushion the EM3 in our ears, alongside some manuals and warranties. So in this chapter, there is not much to be said, other than the fact that the inside of the box, not pictured here, is quite tidy!

 

Build Quality

4.jpg

FiiO is really interested in good build quality and that shows quite a bit in the EM3. They have gone quite an interesting direction because they decided to build something new “in-house” instead of using an OEM shell like many Earbud makers seem to choose (like the Monk that we will be comparing these to!).  As you can see in the picture above, the buds are quite thin, making these an easy fit in your ear, alongside the fact that the plastic of the housing is of very good quality as well.

5.jpg

Here we can see that the outline of the bud is made out of rubber that makes it harder for the bud to escape from your ear. We also have a grill that covers the driver from all types of dirt.

6.jpg

On the backside of the earbuds we can find the engravings that allow us to find which side earbud we are using, and once again where we can side the design used on these EM3.

7.jpg

Here we have the cable and the mic included, that also has a pause/play button on the back of it that also allows you to skip songs when double tapped. I would have liked to see a volume control here as well, but nothing too important. What I feel is important though is a thicker cable, as I don’t know if the slim cable will withstand abuse that well. I guess only time will tell.

8.jpg

To end the build quality section, we find the angled gold plated jack, with 4 connectors (due to the inclusion of a mic). It feels sturdy comparing it to the cable, so I think it won’t be the cause of a possible malfunction.

Overall the build quality is interesting and so is the design that FiiO came to use with these EM3. But lets see how they actually fare once I start using them.

 

Comfort/Isolation

In order to start talking about comfort, we have to keep in mind that these are earbuds, therefore they will never be a snug fit like IEM’s. Barring that, I really enjoy their fit, since their slim design allows them to fit on your ear and not feel intrusive at all, unlike bigger earbuds like the Monk. The comfort is also improved with the included foam covers, but I found out they impacted the sound in a way I didn’t enjoy (they added even more warmth to them). I have also tried donut covers, and I found out that they didn’t impact the sound as much, but since they fitted quite well without any type of foam I have disregarded their use during the review process. So, in what regards comfort, these are as comfortable as you can get regarding earbuds.

Since they are not a vented design, they don’t have much trouble isolating you from a bit of outside noise (of course never at a level of an IEM), and you can ride the bus with your music and listen to just a bit of outside noise, therefore they are also a touch above other earbuds I have tried in isolation terms.

The microphonics noise is also not very pronounced, probably due to the slim cable.

 

Sound

Source – HifimeDIY Sabre Dac amped with Objective 2 DIY, Lumia 625

Files Used –  256 to 320 kbps and FLAC

As always, before using starting to review these, I let them play a variety of music for about 50 hours (having tried them when they first arrived). I did not notice an enormous amount of change in these, but overall they felt tighter.

We should start by describing their overall sound signature. I think these are quite warm earbuds, specially with a nice low end rumble for earbuds.

IMG_0569.jpg

 
Starting with the low end, we have quite a pleasing bass extension, even more so considering these are earbuds. Don’t expect ultra low frequency rumble with these, but the low/mid bass hits you with an okay decay speed.

The mids are where these (and most earbuds) truly shine, as they are capable of delivering intimate vocals with a nice touch of warmness to them. Any kind of Pop will flow flawlessly with the EM3, making these a perfect buy for your pop loving SO (or your guilty pleasure Taylor Swift, I don’t judge, she’s amazing). Once again, you have a decent texture, but nothing too overwhelming.

The highs of these EM3 complement the rest of the spectrum quite well, with the cymbals resonating quite a bit, having just the right amount of impact in order to make them not so tiring.

In terms of soundstage, due to them not being a vented design, it isn’t as spacious as other Earbuds, but it still is bigger than most IEM’s! The soundstage and positional accuracy of the instruments make these an interesting choice for orchestral music, just lacking the fine detail from a more expensive earbud.

All of these impressions were based on the EM3 without the foam covers that while giving the EM3 a much better fit (they stay on even better), give them perhaps a bit too much warmth (since they are kind of warm to being with) and make them lose the airiness that is one of the main benefits of a bud.

As for some songs that the EM3 do really well I’ll leave two below:

 

Taylor Swift – I know Places – Her voice just blends in the amazing instrumental, like I said above these are really interesting for pop music.

Gorillaz – On Melancholy Hill – The bass line goes along really well, alongside the vocals that just sound great on these EM3 (but the song is great already on its own).

 As for a quick comparison with the Monk, the Monk is more spacious (the soundstage is absolutely fabulous) and tuned towards a more musical sound, as the EM3 sound more comercial and tuned for the general crowd.

Conclusion

Build Quality: 4/5

Accessories: 4/5

Comfort: 4/5

Isolation: 4/5

Sound Quality (bang for buck): 4/5

FiiO tried to enter in the earbud market and I think with much success. These will be the buds included with many of their DAP’s and I think they will do just fine to create the bug for more expensive buds in your future. As for how they stand on their own, I think that the EM3 make a perfect match to give as a gift for all of your friends that are still stuck on their original cellphone’s earbuds and don’t know how great music can sound. I think they have a more consumer tuned sound than other similar priced buds (like the Monk that I still highly regard and think everyone should get), therefore it will be easier to gift them to your friends and family. I would have liked a thicker cable to give them a sturdier feel, but I guess that can be improved upon.

Also, unlike the Monk, they are more efficient and don’t scale as much, so everyone can drive the EM3 out of their phone without much hassle, and the integrated controls and mic will surely be pleasant for a lot of people.

There’s not much to say, I think that with the constant offers that FiiO is already offering on these, everyone can afford to buy one EM3 and see if it caters to their needs (they have been my daily driver while I’m outside and using my cellphone, during this week I’ve spent with them). If they don’t, I’m sure your friend will enjoy them a lot! Share the audio bug among your friends, the EM3 is a nice budget choice.

 

References

Price: RRP (10$) on Amazon

Back
Top