Been doing some serious a/b'ing of the Caldera and Atrium tonight. I will put out a review of both the Atrium and Caldera before the end of the year. A bit behind as I wasn't planning on a 3 week sojourn to the hospital with my mother.
I am listening to both through my Icon HP8 MK2 Signature. No EQ with either. Set up as max PCM through Roon. So, upsampling to 192k, but nothing else. All files are 24/48. I don't actually think the comparison between the Atrium and Caldera is the one I will highlight when I review either. I will spend more time comparing the Caldera to the LCD-4z and the Atrium to my other dynamic headphones. But, as I have both here it is fun to compare them. I will also be able to use my new amp when it arrives with both as it should be here by end of next week. I will let everyone know what it is once it arrives. I want to make sure it arrives without issue.
Impressions: Side Note - Lots of reference to food, so if you don't like music or food stop reading now...
![Headphone Smile :) :)](https://cdn.head-fi.org/e/headfi/smily_headphones1.gif)
1. I love them both!
2. Bass control on the Caldera is better. More speed, better coherent picture between 80hz and 150hz. Bass of the Atrium is amazing, but not quite as agile. It is perhaps a bit more humped through the 150-200hz region, whereas the Caldera to my ears is more linear. I love this quality. The Caldera bass response is near perfect to my ears.
3. Midrange size is bigger on the Atrium. Soundstage in general is larger on the Atrium. Especially laterally. They both display a superior front to back staging due to ADS.
4. The bite of guitars & vocals are more prevalent on the Atrium. The Caldera is much more neutral through the presence region. However, the Caldera displays impeccable speed and has a more developed stage, even though smaller. Layering, and the subtlety of my music is more present on the Caldera.
5. The Atrium just sounds right to me. There is very little I don't like about its tuning. Especially the space between the notes, and the decay of notes which happens in such an organic manner. They linger perfectly, hanging in the air just long enough for me to grasp them so that I can remember their sound as the song moves effortlessly to the next section.
6. The Caldera is more intense all the way around. It presents more of everything in my music without blinking. The Atrium is no slouch just takes a more languid approach. I love both approaches.
7. Treble has a bit more Planar bite to it on the Caldera in the mid to upper treble. Atrium is one laid back customer.
8. Transience on the Caldera needs to be heard. The ability to stop and start, the speed of note decay, the ability for the headphone to just keep pushing forward. There is no lingering, the Caldera flows with the music and makes you listen and stay with the song. No waiting around, just get up and go. The difference between a walk in the park and a walk in Manhattan.
It might seem like I am contradicting myself a bit with some of my impressions. I don't think so, because they are more headphones that compliment one another with different purposes and points of view. It is hard to compare them when I would prefer to say that they compliment one another.
Zach and I talked about how you make something that sounds like "home". That is the Atrium for me. The Caldera is more technically adept, which enables you to travel from home to venue, to studio and everywhere in between. The Caldera puts you in the room with all of your favorite bands and presents the space of that room exactly as the engineer has mixed the sound. I love this quality. But, the intangibles of the Atrium cannot be ignored. It has a sumptuous quality, satisfying and warms the soul. Have you ever eaten a Shanghai Soup Dumpling? You pop it into your mouth and are transported to a place of bliss. The pork is savory and warm, the dough breaks and you are flooded with the most delicious broth. The taste just consumes you, you can't discern anything else. That is how the Atrium makes me feel. Whereas the Caldera tastes to me like a perfectly seared scallop in duck fat with the perfect compliment of a creamy celery root puree, with sauteed celery in walnut oil, highlighted by a truffle vinaigrette and a hint of raw celery leaves for vibrancy. Intense, and balanced. The taste of the caramelized scallop as it slowly envelopes the duck fat, the crunch of a perfectly seared crust. The way the scallop reacts to the knife giving way and just continuing to move forward. You can barely feel the knife cut through the meat. Finished by the acidic note of the vinaigrette giving you balance. If you can tell me which part of the dish represents bass, midrange and treble you win!
![Headphone Smile :) :)](https://cdn.head-fi.org/e/headfi/smily_headphones1.gif)
The Caldera handles all the complexity of my music in the same way that dish balances every flavor and texture. As a chef I always compare music and gear to food. They are both pursuits of our senses, and share similarities. I always viewed running my kitchen as a jazz ensemble. It is a night of improv. We don't know what tickets are coming in, the order, pace or what will be ordered. So, we have to react and find our rhythm. We need to use all of our senses, both hands, move in a way that harmonizes with the other cooks and kitchen staff. Everything must come together, always anchored by the lead who navigates the timing and keeps everyone on track. The Caldera does this in spades.
I love them both for completely different reasons. Thanks for reading my insanity!