Music Alchemist
Pokémon trainer of headphones
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Posts
- 20,092
- Likes
- 2,300
Ykyaaw you have a near religious experience standing in an electronics store. Just walked into hhgregg to try out the cans and kill some time. Salesman comes over and asks what I need. Offhand I mention I'm looking for a preamp for my crown d75, start discussing, say "well it is over 30 years old". Of course this pup needs an education on how important the d75 was.
He lights up seeing an opportunity to sell me a " tube powered sound bar". (Now I had written tubes off as not worth the trouble without ever giving them a fair shake)
So I humor him, walk over and select a little miles Davis. Whoa.
The sound bar had so many flaws (for the cost) but dat smooth tube sound has me reconsidering my stance.
Speaking of salesmen...
YKYAAW this is one of the most laughable things you've ever heard. (Pasted from a story in a PM.)
I gave them a call and the tech rep there said that he used some formula to determine why the CD-Quality version sounded louder. He basically divided the bit depth by the sample rate for both tracks to get the db level. So the 24/192 original has a volume level of .125 DBs, where the 16/44.1 downsampled copy has a volume level of .36 DBs. So his explanation was that since the Redbook copy had a higher db level, that's why it was louder.
(The 16/44.1 files were converted from 24/192 files, so there shouldn't have been a difference in volume, and wasn't, except on a portable device.)