Xonar Essence STX: Sneak Peek!
Apr 10, 2009 at 5:58 PM Post #1,306 of 2,066
Yeah, I forgot to mention channels as they do look the same but they are usually denote din the # as Alydon pointed out. Just make sure your looking at DIP 8 with 2 channels. You can go with SOIC8 but you will need a adapters.
 
Apr 11, 2009 at 1:55 AM Post #1,307 of 2,066
Quote:

Originally Posted by Funky-kun /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Talking about opamps, I think I've ended my quest for the perfect ones. Here are my impressions. All testing done through HP out with HD650s.

JRC2114 (default) : I actually think the default opamp for the card is a really good choice. Had it not been for the bassy and dark signature of my cans, I would have kept these. They actually sound the best with my HD595s. Bass is very deep, with perfect extension, just a bit too much in quality for the HD650s. The highs tend to be a bit rolled off, and the soundstage is pretty wide, but not deep and high. I imagine these would sound fantastic with headphones like K701/2 or DT880, but is too heavy for my current cans.

LT1364 : I didn't like these very much. Bass seems neutral, but lacks punch. Mid and highs are well balanced, but soundstage isn't that much better than 2114. Detail is improved. Sounds too weightless.

OPA2134 : Disappointment. As Alienns stated, the default opamps are just better. These have more bass, but the quality is degraded in comparison. With these opamps the bass on 650s sounded like the one on my HD212. (read: boomy) Highs are also rolled off. The soundstage isn't impressive, but opens a bit after burn-in. Sounded "dense", in the sense that all the sounds are too close to you and without good positioning.

LME49720 : All I can say is these babies ROCK. Bass lacks just a little bit of extension, but is very natural sounding and punchy. Highs are brighter than average, but that cancels out with the dark signature of my headphones well, resulting in an overall neutral tonality. Soundstage is absolutely awesome. You can easily position instruments in direction and distance. Has the depth other opamps are missing. All details are clearly present, but the sound is a bit distant due to the soundstaging. My current and final choice.

LM6172 : These are very close in sound to the LME49720. Biggest difference is that they aren't so distant sounding. That means less soundstage and a bit better bass. I didn't find the trade off worthwhile. Still a very valid choice.

I hope all of you find the perfect opamp match for your headphones. I have done it.
smily_headphones1.gif



Sorry to quote this again but mmm..looking at these comparsions, looks like the DT880 might fit well with the LM6172.

That said, I might get 2 LME49720's and 3 LM6172 to do a nice comparison.

Anyone done a 2 LME 49720 + 1 LM6172 buffer or 3 x LM6172 comparison?
 
Apr 11, 2009 at 11:32 AM Post #1,308 of 2,066
Quote:

Originally Posted by chinesekiwi /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Sorry to quote this again but mmm..looking at these comparsions, looks like the DT880 might fit well with the LM6172.

That said, I might get 2 LME49720's and 3 LM6172 to do a nice comparison.

Anyone done a 2 LME 49720 + 1 LM6172 buffer or 3 x LM6172 comparison?



Yes, I have. With 3x6172 the mid/upper-bass hump the 6172 has was too overbearing w/ the DT990's, although the 880's probably won't suffer from it as much. However, the soundstage was a little too small, which the 880's would feel as well. And instrument decay also truncated a little too quickly, making it sound like the music didn't have enough chance to breathe.

The 1x6172 + 2x49720 combo is an excellent choice for Beyer's, though. It's my favorite setup actually (as evidenced by my sig
biggrin.gif
)...
 
Apr 12, 2009 at 10:10 PM Post #1,312 of 2,066
How would 3x 2277 Dip 8 sound, Like since I already have them in my I/V. I wonder how one would sound in my buffer since there dual channel.

Sady i only ordred 2 of them instead of 3.
 
Apr 13, 2009 at 5:07 AM Post #1,313 of 2,066
Some questions on the Essence:

1. Do the drivers work with Windows 7 Beta 64-bit?

2. Is the Essence a better soundcard than the HT Omega Claro Halo for listening to FLAC music? (I have Senn 595 headphones.)

3. Has anyone come across a modern videogame where the Essence performs poorly or not at all?
 
Apr 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM Post #1,314 of 2,066
1. yes they do as I using Xonar HDAV13 drivers in windows 7 beta just fine.

2. Yes the essence is the better card then the HT omega clario halo .

3.I been gaming with my HDAV13 for a while now and I haven notice any poor performance at all. Might not be a STX but still shouldnt be a problem.Then I have a overclocked system.
 
Apr 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM Post #1,315 of 2,066
when using low impedance phones (AD900's in my example) is it better to run through the headphone output with 0 gain, and have the volume at 1,2 or 3 - or is it better to run it from the L/R channels so that I don't have to have the master volume so low?
 
Apr 14, 2009 at 2:09 AM Post #1,316 of 2,066
i think the lowest gain is for low ohms headphones.
 
Apr 14, 2009 at 8:39 AM Post #1,317 of 2,066
Quote:

Originally Posted by kuben /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I have this card for one day and i cannot hear BIG difference between stx and my onboard card i use latest asus drivers foobar+hdj-2000 win xp, many flac's,320's so whats wrong? I need to burn-in? Change headphones? Enable ASIO? Clear my ears? Go to hell?


Latest integrated soundcards sound 20x better than any previous chips. Previous chips was total crap for hi-fi. Some of new one`s even sounds like X-Fi. They can be found on latest (higher models) Gigabyte motherboards like P35-DQ6, P45-DQ6 etc. Of course STX is better but for integrated sound is huge step in sound quality.
beerchug.gif


edit: If you have one of this latest integrated soundcards and not so good headphones or amplifier with good speakers you will not notice some huge difference between them.
 
Apr 14, 2009 at 3:30 PM Post #1,318 of 2,066
I'm noticing a puzzling thing... sometimes, one song will play with a much slower tempo (and sometimes faster tempo) then normal. If I stop and play again, it'll go to normal tempo.

I'm not sure if its foobar, ASIO, vista or the essence STX but I thought I'd ask if anyone noticed something like this?
 
Apr 14, 2009 at 5:50 PM Post #1,319 of 2,066
I dont notice any thing like that But I using Winamp/Xmplay with Asio and not foobar, and then in win7 build 7077 beta and not my vista boot.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top