HTSkywalker
Headphoneus Supremus
YES and YESis there a lot of difference in sound when changing tubes?
is it worth changing?

YES and YESis there a lot of difference in sound when changing tubes?
is it worth changing?
You'll need to decide that for yourself. If you notice a difference, one you enjoy more over another, then yes I find the tubes I enjoy have a wide, deep and tall sound stage. Moving around in the top 3 the Brimar 6060's have a more full pleasing sound to me, and a wider - beside and behind the ears sound stage - that sounds more "real" to me, and is striking enough that I often need to pull off the headphones to tell if outside sounds are what I am hearing, or if the environment being mixed into what I am watching or listening to is the source of the "realism".is there a lot of difference in sound when changing tubes?
is it worth changing?
thanks for the advice of these valves rimar 6060, Mullard M8162 (12AT7WA, CV4024), and Haltron E80CC.You'll need to decide that for yourself. If you notice a difference, one you enjoy more over another, then yes I find the tubes I enjoy have a wide, deep and tall sound stage. Moving around in the top 3 the Brimar 6060's have a more full pleasing sound to me, and a wider - beside and behind the ears sound stage that sounds niew "real" to me, and is striking enough that I often need to pull off the headphones to tell if outside sounds are what I am hearing or if the environment being mixed into what I am watching or listening to is the source of the "realism".
With those 3 pairs, Brimar 6060, Mullard M8162 (12AT7WA, CV4024), and Haltron E80CC they are similar but different enough to me that I can enjoy the changes between them.
If the E80CC's didn't run so hot - they use 2x the heater current and make the TA-20 "hotter" - I'd probably just burn through the 5 pair of those I have
But, I could also pick another 3 pair out of the others I have boxed up and enjoy those too. The more enjoyable sounding - interesting sounding? - it doesn't mean more "accurate" but perhaps more "realistic" sounding to my ears, especially considering our methods of storage and presentation (speakers/headphones) we are always living in audio's archaic times, so find what pleases you to listen to at the time and enjoy it.
I don't worry about how someone else is going to judge my enjoyment because our paths of experience are all very different, far more varied than are the shared same experiences.
If you do the same things all the time, you start to notice things, you become sensitive to differences if you pay attention. I was fortunate in that I began listening to radio signals with headphones when I was 7 or 8, and got my Amateur radio license when I was 12, and won CW contests until just before High School when I started working and didn't have much free time, but those early days of picking out weak signals, trying different headphones and amplifiers added on to existing radios, filters and equalizing the audio to best get the edge on hearing faint signals, still sticks with me today.
I have to bear the burden of my experience, but if you don't hear a difference, don't sweat it, it may come to you over time and it may not - either way enjoying the music doesn't really require those last smidgens of differentiation in the audio![]()
There are lots of other great sounding tubes out there, I wouldn't focus your search too early except to use them as a starting point for your own discoveries. You may like other tube characteristics more than the ones I enjoy, you won't know for sure until you actually take the time to listen.oh thanks for the advice of these valves Brimar 6060, Mullard M8162 (12AT7WA, CV4024), and Haltron E80CC.
This amp is still really powerful for 200 mW, and I need to turn my source to 20/100 in windows to get the volume to 9 o clock. This sound is less in your face and probably a better pair with Grado than the 602
Which tube has the fullest and deepest sound?
For me it sounded pretty good with the Grado as it has a more laid back sound, and had a better synergy compared to MT-602 (way too powerful and has volume channel imbalances at low volumes with low impedance headphones like Grado). For some reason the MT-601 was picking up some background noise. I moved it to another part of my condo where this noise has reduced, and I sometimes use it for listening.Hello, do you still like xDuoo MT-601 as an amplifier for Grado? During this time did you find any problems or minuses in MT-601?
Thanks for the detailed answer. And what could you say about the sound of MT-601? Everywhere reviews only about MT-602 and extremely few reviews about 601 model.For me it sounded pretty good with the Grado as it has a more laid back sound, and had a better synergy compared to MT-602 (way too powerful and has volume channel imbalances at low volumes with low impedance headphones like Grado). For some reason the MT-601 was picking up some background noise. I moved it to another part of my condo where this noise has reduced, and I sometimes use it for listening.
If it wasnt for the noise problem, I would use it much more. I contacted the seller and they said it might be the power supply. I ended up changing the tube to Phillips NOS and this did not fix the problem. I thought it was the power so I also invested in a conditioner, that did not fix it either. The 601 also gets quite hot.
The MT-602 is dead quiet for comparison.
I am not sure if my unit was an outlier or if others have had similar problems....
Ok, thank you.Yea I would say its less forward sounding. These are hybrid amps, so they will not be the full tube experience. It also depends on the tubes used. With the phllips NOS it was definitely on the warm side with smooth treble.