Jahn
Headphoneus Supremus Prolificus
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2004
- Posts
- 21,333
- Likes
- 40
oh are we doing it based on suckage in ratio to songs sold? then it has to be this guy for teh win...
Originally Posted by jjcha Heh, it has nothing to do with sales ratios... just I dare anyone to find a song as bad as the one I linked. Though don't expect me to listen to it. Man, the one I posted is bad. Best, -Jason |
Originally Posted by jjcha James, I'll be over in 5 minutes to confiscate the Lambda Pros/Darth Grado. The Bureau of Headphone Safety for the greater NY region needs to keep these headphones from further abuse. Sorry man. Best, -Jason |
Originally Posted by Coltrane Of course it doesnt. Making crappy music to make money does make one a sell out though. It has nothing to do with popularity. It has to do with the purpose of making music. You can make lots of money, and you can sign with major comanies and sitll make perfectly valid and excellent music. But Nickleback or Third Eye Blind suck so bad because they are making music for money and to get girls. Its an embarrassing perversion of something I consider holy. Something WAY worse than not being able to play your instruments. |
Originally Posted by Jahn edit - ok ok repost - the Worst Music Video Evar. http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/w...sic_video.html |
Originally Posted by breadcrumbs You'll pardon my musical blashemy, but I genuinely don't think Nickelback are that bad. I certainly wouldn't buy an album, but at least they have their own distinctive vocal style and some sense of quiet-loud dynamics. |
Originally Posted by MdRex Now your only task is to prove that the above mentioned groups only make music to make money and the rest that you considered "good" doesn't. Simple. No? |