I had a much longer response initially typed up yesterday, but was hoping that you would take the cue and drop it too, guess not.
Anyway, you can believe what you want about these companies. I'm not trying to change your mind. You were the one that was "startin it up" with me, now you wanna "take the high road", lol, and act like you didn't instigate anything. People crack me up. We can agree to disagree.
This wasn't about taking the high road, it was about avoiding the discussing turning into what I feel like it already turned into. So lets see, we can agree to disagree, sure. Absolutely. But also I was "startin it up"? I simply responded to on of your posts with opinions. Am I not allowed to do that?
Right, this is America, we are free to say what is on our minds, and shouldn't have to worry about it. Your statements did have an ad-hominem, undercurrent. You were attempting to paint me in a certain way, in order to strengthen your position, which is against mine. Make me seem like an irrational, "black and white" type of person, which is not the truth. I mean, you can play unaware about it, but just know, that style of discussion, will irritate many people.
I really wasn't attempting to paint you in any way. I was responding to the things you specifically wrote. I may have interpreted your words in a way you didn't mean, but I absolutely did not attack you personally or say anything about you. If you took that as some kind of ad-hominem attack, thats really on you.
The truth is, I have seen posts like this before. They are often thinly veiled attempts to call out people for spending money on this hobby and to try and prove a point. I perceived that you were taking it in that direction so my initial post was just me explaining how I viewed things. I am happy to admit when I was wrong, but again, I was not attacking you or doing any of these things you describe. You accuse me of twisting your words? You read so much more meaning into my post than I ever did on yours... wow.
I want to point you back to your own posts.
Small/boutique companies are sketchy to me. Many of them are basically con-artists, out for your money.
Sure, Ill give you this. You said many, not all. But do you really not see how that can be taken as blanket statement here?
Maybe cut me some slack for interpreting your posts as I did, epsecially because it wasnt the only post where you said something similar.
I listened to a pair of Unique Melody 3DD-TI, with "new improved titanium drivers", lol. They had a retail price of $1100...and sounded bad. Here, the OP tells us a good story about Bowers and Wilkinson. Overpriced B&W P5's, that failed after 2 months. They had sketchy soldering inside, and mediocre design. There it is. This stuff doesn't surprise me, and there is much more, where that came from. People should be talking about BS like this, and exposing these ripoffs. People who know about the shoddiness of these products, yet deny the problem, must have ulterior motives.
You quote one product and one issue here and again apply it to your viewpoint that boutique companies are sketchy. Again I dont think its much of a stretch to think you mean that all (or most) boutique products are sketchy.
And then do you really not see how your last line there could very easily be taken to mean that you are essentially accusing many many people of being shills for hiding how crappy these products all are?
I get it, you were speaking about one particular product (though you do say there is much more), and you are specifically talking about hiding broken stuff for sales. But again, I really dont think I am making much of a leap, and if you dont see why your posts may have rubbed me in the wrong way, then I would direct you back to your whole ad-hominem undercurrent thingy you described earlier, because thats kind of the vibe I get from you.
And then you said this...
More of the same. Clearly, I did not take my argument to that level, "anyone who disagrees"? Where did that come from? Do you have an agenda here?
Oh ok, now you are accusing me of having an agenda. So straight up ad-hominem. Got it.
Again, I said seem like 6 times in that initial post. It should have been a dead give away that it was how I was interpreting things. You could have just come back and cleared up what you meant. Instead you attacked me, and twisted my post to somehow think it was an attack on you. And to top it off, you actually ignored the substantive stuff I said at the end, where I basically agreed that a lot of this high end boutique stuff likely isnt worth the costs they are asking. And that what I really disagree about is that I just wouldnt qualify it as a scam. While you very much seem to think it is a scam. Maybe not for all, but it seems pretty clear that you think the vast majority of boutique stuff is a scam. Maybe your definition of scam is different than mine. Maybe you qualify anything you perceive as overpriced as a scam. I dont. These are real products that exists, so that to me is not a scam. You get what you pay for, not a scam. Quality (either in build or sound) may not match your expectations for the price, and thats fine, thats your opinion.
I am also not arguing that scams dont exist. They can and do. I got caught up in one. I am also not saying shills dont exist. They do, they are out there giving everything rave reviews. But I think these cases are the exception not the rule, whereas you seem to think opposite. Thats really what this boils down to.
And I am willing to admit that the two short sentences I wrote where I interpreted your posts may have been wrong. I may have brought my personal bias into it. I can admit that that part was maybe again exaggerated (sound familiar?) and incorrect. Can you do the same?
Also, I didnt want to respond, because I am sure you will have a rebuttal for each thing I said here, and we can go back and forth forever and accomplish nothing. I tried to walk away, but I guess I failed. I really dont need to defend myself to some random internet stranger... so I kinda feel like an idiot for even trying. So, sorry anyone else who reads this.