What's your foobar2000 setup?

Oct 7, 2011 at 7:56 AM Post #121 of 540
Cheers,

I'll give it try.

Edit:

Had to auto-hide the taskbar to get a proper screenshot. No idea why.



I stole the play controls from fooAero DUI. Pretty basic but it lets me get to my music quickly and without jumping through any hoops.

The thing about foo themes and skins is - the slicker they look the less functional they are for exploring your music collection. At least that's what I find.
 
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM Post #122 of 540
The thing about foo themes and skins is - the slicker they look the less functional they are for exploring your music collection. At least that's what I find.

I agree. I prefer something that looks moderately beautiful but still contains heaps of information.
That's the principle I try to design my UI's on, and so far it hasn't let me down.

The trick is always to display information in such a way that it's still clear while taking up as little space as possible while also not compromising looks.
 
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:25 PM Post #123 of 540


Quote:
Looks great. How did you get your screen shot?
I've tried Windows built in and Fraps, but I can't get the whole Foobar screen to show. Fraps only gives me the Schpeck window.



Alt+Print Screen captures the current window in focus. S'how I take all of my images. Then I just paste into Paint or whatever.
 
-- Griffinhart
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 2:15 AM Post #125 of 540
Last time I tried a pretty foobar setup it lagged a bit too much to be useful. Slow scrolling and responsiveness. Winamp on the other hand is instant for me. Has anyone else experienced this? Maybe it was the particular setup I chose. Wouldn't mind trying again one of these days since it's been over a year.
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 2:29 AM Post #126 of 540

 
Quote:
Last time I tried a pretty foobar setup it lagged a bit too much to be useful. Slow scrolling and responsiveness. Winamp on the other hand is instant for me. Has anyone else experienced this? Maybe it was the particular setup I chose. Wouldn't mind trying again one of these days since it's been over a year.

 
This has definitely been true for me as well at least on my old desktop.  Either way, most of the nicer configs while looking nice never fit my uses so I just stick to my own setup which is just the built-in foobar layout editor + facets plugin.
 
The lag is probably due to all the external plugins and crap that the config has to call for.  Vanilla foobar plus just a few plugins will have a much smaller system footprint at least in my experience.
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 3:23 AM Post #127 of 540
Vanilla foobar should be light - like, no-more-than-20MB-of-RAM-in-use light.
 
My f2k install runs at 200MB, but I have some fancy background stuff going on (scrobbling, streaming, tweeting, plus autosaving and the waveform seekbar). But 200MB ain't nothin' to Joyeuse. CPU usage is ~1.5% on my Core i7-930.
 
-- Griffinhart
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 5:30 AM Post #128 of 540
I have a huge amount of plugins installed, and still foobar2000 only uses 140MB's of RAM. CPU rarely ever hits 3% during playback. (AMD 965 BE).
For me Winamp was actually a lot slower, even vanilla.
And iTunes... Well, let's not go that route. (it eats up all my RAM and CPU and takes 5 minutes to start up because it can't handle large libraries.)
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 6:19 AM Post #129 of 540
I've just started using foobar2000 and am trying to rip my CD's to FLAC but when i load my cd on no track name or artist name appears. How do i get this information?
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 9:44 AM Post #130 of 540
I've just started using foobar2000 and am trying to rip my CD's to FLAC but when i load my cd on no track name or artist name appears. How do i get this information?


Did you install freedb tagger when you installed the program? Under custom install, it is an option, so I'm not positive this feature installs by default.
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 9:48 AM Post #131 of 540
Yeah i got it to work, i reinstalled but this time selected full, last time i just went default which didn't have freedb.
 
Oct 8, 2011 at 7:44 PM Post #132 of 540
It's a pretty vanilla setup, but I really like it! It's efficient, pretty and clean - I dislike messy interfaces 
cool.gif


 
Oct 8, 2011 at 9:04 PM Post #133 of 540

 
Mine is actually just a slight tweak of the Griffinhart version that started this thread out.   It does what I need, so I haven't really done much with it. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top