What's so bad about Bose?

May 10, 2009 at 6:54 AM Post #106 of 194
Quote:

Originally Posted by synaesthetic /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I wish the mods would just ban any discussion about Bose. It never goes anywhere, never reveals any new information, always degenerating into a furious, masturbatory flurry of insults and diatribes on how much Bose sucks.

I realize that this would preclude us from discussing any Bose products, but that doesn't really happen here anyway. I can't even describe the Bose threads as discussion. Maybe one or two insightful comments.

I am not defending Bose or putting Bose down. I could care less about the company or their products. I'm just sick of clicking on a thread and seeing posts bashing Bose that are just so juvenile. -.-



Then would you like something different?

Almost all Bose discussions are from the perspective of consumers either disgruntled at Bose or simply annoyed at the Bose Corporation.

Would you prefer that I add a different perspective to a Bose discussion? One of an ex-Bose retailer?? I'm sure you will find the discussion somewhat enlightening...yet, at the same time, ALL too familiar (just read the consumer post here, they've got the Bose company pretty much pegged when it comes to their methods if you can believe it!)

Bose is indeed more interested in marketing than products. For example, Bose VIOLENTLY defends both a dealer's authorized selling district AND the price that dealer charges for Bose goods. Want to know WHY Bose products are so overpriced? Because Bose will 'terminate' any dealer that does not stick to the MSRP / MAP of its goods. They can't do it openly for that would be a violation of the Sherman Act, but Bose has it's ways - as a dealer, you'll find your shipments close down to a TRICKLE if you have the nerve to advertise a Bose sale in your district without express permission from Bose first.

...which usually comes with all the regularity of the ski season in Hades.

If you've ever opened up a 901 you will find the product's cost based on construction materials no where near the asking price. Nine 4" drivers in an injection moulded plastic frame, with top and bottom MDF veneered panels, simply isn't worth that much, sorry. The Bose mystique is one of a carefully controlled marketing plan, and as a dealer I was expected to roll with the plan lock, stock and barrel. Advertisement copy had to meet strict qualifications or, much more preferred by the company, a simple cut/paste of Bose ad copy from the dealer’s advertising guide flysheets. Yes, Bose supplied the ad copy in pre-made designs and ideally Bose preferred you use them instead of writing your own.

All this, and much more, present an interesting plan from Bose as a whole, considering that they actually expected us to honestly say "Bose is great!" when we had B&W 802s', 801's and 808's; Celestion SL-600 and SL-6's; ProAc's and numerous other truly excellent performing loudspeakers just a few yards away. In my later years when someone asked for a Bose demonstration I turned the system on...and left the listening room, closing the door behind me. I couldn't stand listening to them for just one more second. Actually, at that time the 301’s were the best sounding (special note: that was the second up from the BOTTOM of the line) and not ‘terrible’, so at least I didn’t grindge in horror while I played them. 301’s actually weren’t too bad and not terribly overpriced for the (modest) performance level they attained, so I wasn’t *too* unhappy with selling them.

But don’t get me started on the price/performance ratio of 901’s…
devil_face.gif


If you do not wish to hear subjective observations do an objective review: one need only do a spectrum analysis of the typical Bose loudspeaker frequency response to discover a response curve significantly underperforming versus the product's price competition. Add in the cost of the construction materials versus MSRP asked and you will find a product that is a tremendously poor value in almost any audio market. If customers had their hearts set on Bose we sold it to them. But, if a customer came in with an open mind and actually asked us “What do you think of [this] Bose product”…we, easily presented them with other products that gave (a) greater performance at (b) a lower price. Every single time. And note that we actually made MORE money when selling a Bose product because it was almost always very close to full MSRP thanks to the strict Bose dealer policies while with the alternative products we were able to discount to our heart’s content (we had a well-known reputation in our area for discounting quality products). Our Bose profit = approximately 30%, while others = 15% or so after the discounting, and therefore we made less money per box moved. So by NOT selling Bose we actually lost margin…but we BELIEVED in the quality products we were selling and took the lower profits if we believed the customer would be happier (yes, there ARE dealers like that!).

Eh, I could go on for a while longer but I think you get the drift. Yes, astute customers (like those here) realized that Bose is simply "poor value"...and, as a dealer, we not only concurred but we put our money where our mouth was and made lower profit on a sale if the customer had an open mind to try alternatives over Bose. Some times the customer was set on Bose and that was that, the Bose sale was written up and done - they got what they wanted. "Customer is always right" and all that. All it takes to decide pro or against Bose is to trust your own ears.
 
May 11, 2009 at 8:47 PM Post #108 of 194
Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Would you prefer that I add a different perspective to a Bose discussion? One of an ex-Bose retailer?? I'm sure you will find the discussion somewhat enlightening...yet, at the same time, ALL too familiar (just read the consumer post here, they've got the Bose company pretty much pegged when it comes to their methods if you can believe it!)


Wow. very interesting read Snake. Thanks for that.
 
May 11, 2009 at 10:16 PM Post #109 of 194
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebhuber /img/forum/go_quote.gif
i am really interested in how they create this bose sound. in terms of drivers..does anybody know?


family_story_waveguide.jpg
 
May 12, 2009 at 3:49 AM Post #110 of 194
Just like everyone else here, I have read many posts about Bose bashing threads. I too am fallen to Bose marketing scheme. Over the years, I have owned few of the Bose products. And recently I was shopping for simple 2.1 music/movie sound system that has high decor friendly according my wife. It wasn't easy task at all for me. My wife keep coming back to "decor friendly" Bose product. We can bash all we want about Bose products but they did a heck of job appealing to many people out there including my wife.

However, at the end, I was able to convince my wife to alternate much less expensive audio product but it wasn't an easy task for me. I was able to accomplish what my wife wants in 1/10th of Bose product.

Just for side note, the only Bose product that I still own is 901 VI speaker set. I am using as my second two channel audio setup. However, I am also using Outlaw LFM-1 subwoofer covering for the bass department. This setup sounds decent enough for me at this time. Would I buy another set of 909 in the future? Not likely.
 
May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM Post #111 of 194
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebhuber /img/forum/go_quote.gif
i am really interested in how they create this bose sound. in terms of drivers..does anybody know?


Immtbiker has a significant portion of the Bose 'technology' and sound down - the Bose ported bandpass box. Bose uses a sixth-order bandpass design, one that they have patented

Sixth-Order BANDPASS SUBWOOFER ENCLOSURE DESIGN calculator

The other part of the Bose sound is one you don't see much, unless you purchase or own the 901 system - active equalization. Most Bose products have some form of equalization built into the system; with their Lifestyle, Wave and car stereo systems it is built into the amplifier stages themselves. Attempt to change the speakers hooked up to a Bose electronics system in hopes of gaining better sound...and you'll learn this truth in a hurry: the new speakers on the old system will sound worse than the Bose speakers did.

On speakers the sound is often created by the choice of drivers - the 'famous' (or should I say "infamous") Bose 4 inch single-cone fiber paper driver - in conjunction with the tuning of the sixth-order bandpass to fit the enclosure space of the model's design.

Then we get to 901's.
angry_face.gif
Using an active external equalizer designed to be inserted into the amp's pre-level tape loop, it must be used to overcome the design's inherent midrange-only sound character created by using exclusively midrange drivers inside the enclosure (how do you get "bass" and "treble" from a series of 4 inch drivers? Electronically limit everything else!). The resulting response is then 'enhanced' by the sixth-order bandpass enclosure operating on the reverse side of the driver cones to reenforce bass response. If you would like to hear what a 901 really sounds like go to your local Bose dealer and remove the EQ from the signal stage (if you can).

Bose_901_Series-V_Active_Equalizer_web.jpg


It will be an eye-opener for you, I'm sure!
 
May 26, 2009 at 2:57 PM Post #113 of 194
snake speaks the truth. i own the 901s. one day the jack of the active crossover (thats what the bose guy later called it) broke so i had to leave it out, and it sounds really, really bad.
at that time im not really into audio, so i thought its my mind playing around. but im quite sure there is a difference, since i am using quite a well-mastered cd- lee ritenour's overtime. i remember exactly how strong the opening bassline sound, but suddenly it sounded thin.
then my uncle brought an audio engineer to check and repair my other system (audio research power amps), and i asked him to also check on the bose system. he said he didnt do bose because he didnt have the knowledge- he told me to just bring it to the authorized bose dealer. but he told me that the degradation in SQ really is because of the lack of that equalizer. so i bring it to the bose dealer and guess what? repairing that small thing cost exactly the same as what the nice audio engineer charged me for repairing my audio research amps.
so after reading snake's remarks, i think the 901 really is a bad speaker. but i found the equalized sound quite enjoyable, NOT for critical listening though.
all in all i think if bose marketed the 901 as a fun, experimental system, not a hi-fi one, i think it would be more acceptable.
and oh, regarding the engineer's lack of knowledge of bose- i think it quite shows how bose really strictly control the repairing and everything. i think the engineer knows about that but he chose to be neutral and not tell me about it.
 
May 27, 2009 at 3:10 AM Post #115 of 194
Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Erik /img/forum/go_quote.gif

Third, Bose heavily markets itself as the best. Clearly, it is not. You can buy natural-sounding equipment made with better materials for less money.

Fourth, Bose has the ability to make quality products and chooses not to. Bose has plenty of capital, engineers, test facilities, manufacturing, everything. If management wanted, Bose could make excellent, high-quality gear. Instead, they make garbage and sell it at the highest possible margin.



they save that r&d money to keep putting commercials on the tv instead. just keep showing classy looking people in a nice feng shui log home with polished hardwood everywhere listening to bose and it looks like the best.
 
Jun 27, 2009 at 1:15 AM Post #116 of 194
I think bose makes ok speaker, but there earphones are piece of crap. The bose ie sound like a over drived bass with no mid and high. very bad. There home theater speaker are ok, but for that price, you could get a much better set from klipsch
 
Jun 28, 2009 at 4:52 AM Post #117 of 194
I've had many Bose products over the years. Started with the 301 Series II, then the 601 Series II, then finally the 901 Series VI. And, I've got to say that I enjoyed the sound quality of each and every one of them.

Placement for sound quality was easiest with the 601's, then the 301's, and lastly the 901's, which tend to be really finicky in the placement department to sound really good; however, they can sound pretty good darn near anywhere (even where normal speakers would sound horrendous).

As for the 901's sounding bad without the EQ in the chain, well, they're made to have it so what's the point in talking about that? That's really akin to complaining about the crappy sound of a headphone while wearing it with the driver on your forehead and back of your head, and saying, "Hey, this doesn't sound right."

Their other products, I'm not familiar with with the exception of their second from the top of the line home theater package, with five cubes and a subwoofer. Wow, does that thing ever sound really, really bad.

Oh, yeah, I forgot. I also like their IE's. They have a very warm (and somewhat muddy) sound, but they're very comfortable and inoffensive. For someone who just wants to listen to a few tunes and relax, the're not bad. For critical listening, not so good.

The one thing that I really love about my 901's is that they sound good even with cheap wires and inexpensive components upstream. With them, I'm not trying to constantly tweak this or adjust that. They just play music.

And for me, music is my passion. The more I can just relax and listen to it, the better.
 
Nov 19, 2009 at 1:19 PM Post #118 of 194
My experience of these systems is that they are designed to sound good in a shop to people who are not really interested in listening to their music in any detail.

The mid bass lift that the kit exhibits makes it sound 'big' and 'full' to a non critical listener, the previous poster stated it was inoffensive, that is a pretty much perfect description for the non critical listener.

The research bit is that they manage to do that with the cheapest componets possible. Which to be fair is an achievment. From the fiddle about with BOSE gear of friends that I have played with their slogan should really be 'Cost optimised pseudo high end audio.'

For my part, I like a much more balanced sound and think pretty much all the Bose stuff I have come across has been lacklustre at best. Quite neatly designed though in some cases. I have found the subs to get a bit 'huffy' at high volume (probably port noise).

If you are a non critical listener and like the sound and design, then great, go for it. But You do pay a hefty premium.

Conks
 
Nov 19, 2009 at 1:53 PM Post #119 of 194
Quote:

Originally Posted by conkerman /img/forum/go_quote.gif
My experience of these systems is that they are designed to sound good in a shop to people who are not really interested in listening to their music in any detail.
...
If you are a non critical listener and like the sound and design, then great, go for it. But You do pay a hefty premium.



I have to disagree somewhat with your first statement. IMO and observation, Bose systems are marketed to people who have the money to pay, who want better audio out of their system than they are gonna get from a $20 JVC boombox, and don't want the hassle of dealing with figuring out how well different components in a system are going to interact with one another such as if you were to match up a Yamaha CDP to a set of Pioneer Speakers.

Your second comment is nuts on, however...
 
Nov 19, 2009 at 2:56 PM Post #120 of 194
I tried out a Bose display thingy the other day and the sound was awful. Well, the speakers were passable. The sub was awful and muddy. The clock/radios in the next aisle actually put out better sound.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top