this is an interesting thread...
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/dig...ind-test-audible-difference-whatsoever-3.html
it's baffling to me that some in the audiophile world have such a difficult time accepting the value of blind testing. Even in light of the fact that in blind testing it's shown to be impossible to differentiate between a $30 dac and a $3000 one, still there's people desperately clinging to the notion that there is
something about the expensive model that makes it worth the money - and that there is something about blind testing that makes audio exempt from it as a use-able procedure. They make silly statements such as "I've never understood the need to compare different products" Um...what? This entire hobby is largely based on comparisons of different products - unfortunately, those comparisons are usually completely subjective and totally meaningless. If I'm being lead to believe that there is something meaningful that justifies spending $3000, or even $300 on a product rather than $30, a (true, blind) comparison between those products matters. If I can't get any real, audible benefit from the more expensive item, then I'd much rather save the money and put it towards something I know will make a difference. Imho, a $3000 dac should not just be a modest improvement over a $30 one. It should be substantial, easily identifiable, significant. It's not. In fact, the difference appears to be completely insignificant - even non-existent. Same goes for expensive cables. Unless there's a difference evident in blind testing, give me the cheap ones thank you.