Quote:
High fidelity means a high quality accurate sound reproduction (in other words, neutral) and it is definitely not a contrast to studio headphones.
and 'reference
grade headphones' is not the same as 'reference headphones'
the original question was slandered.
insisting on creating your own language, or simply forgetting english?
there is only one thing to 'grade' once the track has left the studio, and that is the hardware the track is played on.
you cannot grade a song after you've heard the song before, it is judging the headphones.
new details heard in the song gives new meaning to the song, but you already graded it with a 'like or dislike'
reference
grade headphones are towards the studio perfection needed to master the audio track.
simply because a business says they are reference grade, that doesnt say if their words are true.
you might take the company to court and they belch out some excuse about their headphone's quality is 'reference grade' compared to headphones on a short list.
that is marketing propaganda with results after blowing past humanitarian laws.
the market is always trying to float past humanitarian law to sell you something with words because they need to completely lie about some junk to sell it.
did you know speakers have a harmonic distortion percentage that can change depending on which frequency is being tested?
because that changes, they simply put out a chart for the noise floor.
and that isnt distortion, that is signal to noise ratio.
the desire to monitor everybody's shopping choices seems to be higher than the importance of being humanitarian.
and i've seen it myself when a person seriously doesnt care enough about themselves and is totally happy with their purchase.
this usually doesnt cause a problem until the price is way too much for the quality received.
being a conscious shopper has been something of a 'niche' and a 'hobby' since the world's fair.
and it means..
if you can hide your progress well enough, then you can release old versions out to the public slowly year after year until you reach the 'best and final' product you came up with.
and now today we must tell people.. 'simply because it is perfectly functional.. that doesnt mean the quality is perfect'
it would of been better to allow people to watch as the inventor was making progress, and keep people out of the way with security.
that way you could see for yourself how hard it is and how to do it yourself and if you wanted to build one of your own and sell it.
consumers will absorb whatever is on the shelves.. they take and take and take without giving anything back (talking about inventions, ideas, and product arrays).
so if you release all there is to give, they will soak it up and want something more.
that is when you know you need a government to keep that type of an 'infant' happy.
nothing worse than a crying baby that wont really tell you what is wrong or why it is crying.
but
the screams get painfully loud and sometimes things get thrown.. but you dont hear about all of that time wasted and how you didnt learn anything during that time.
you are supposed to be always learning something.. even at work you can learn something from a friend that works along side you as long as you are responsible enough to talk and get the work done at the same time.
people are filling up 'voids' when people have a question.
but what they are filling those voids up with is not the highest grade of accuracy.
in fact, we can see here in this thread.. people are willing to get dirty if it does anything to raise the accuracy of their attempt.
graphicism could not know if it is 'marketing allure' without checking the websites you visited (or knowing which headphones are being discussed because you somehow told him/her).
