What are head-fi members views on apt-x lossless codec (over bluetooth)?
post-13432482
Post #421 of 460

lennyr

New Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
25
Reaction score
11
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Posts
25
Likes
11
Has anyone tried the Avantree Clipper Pro?  It looks interesting, in that it supports AptX - Low Latency, and is Bluetooth 4.2.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13457396
Post #422 of 460

StanD

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
9,002
Reaction score
1,118
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Posts
9,002
Likes
1,118
I just got a pair of Jaybird X3's. They are not apt-x but they are BT 4.1 and with EDR they do not have the compression issues that everyone is so concerned with when using the SBC codec. It has an AAC codec (for Apple folks) and some form of modified SBC codec (whatever that means). They happen to sound very good and that's what counts. There's an app for android and iOS that allows you to draw and save EQ curves. The EQ is done inside the IEMs, so you don't need the app to be running once it is set.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13597804
Post #423 of 460

cityle

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
258
Reaction score
31
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
258
Likes
31
Combined the ear-in from Sony with my ath-im02 inorder to have the LDAC codec with sound of my lovely ath-im02. Works great. It's a big plus that now Android O have baked in support for aptX, aptX hd and LDAC.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13958091
Post #424 of 460

turbobb

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
446
Reaction score
182
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Posts
446
Likes
182
Giving this a necro-bump rather than starting a new thread since my question is related to the three flavors of aptX but don't see it covered so far.

I have a Bluewave Get that features aptX HD on order, in corresponding with the developer, he mentioned that the Get should be backwards compatible with regular aptX and aptX Low Latency (LL), it'll use the corresponding codec depending on the paired device and what is being played (e.g. if video, it should automatically use aptX LL).

I recently got the V30 and when paired with Mixcder's HD601 (which features aptX LL) it only connects via regular aptX. The V30 doesn't give any indication as to which codec is being used, I can only tell by the LED color on the HD601. This seems to indicate that either the V30 doesn't support aptX LL or aptX HD isn't backwards compatible with it. Would anyone know for sure?

TIA!,
Tim
 
     Share This Post       
post-13958097
Post #425 of 460

Dulalala

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
1,855
Reaction score
334
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Posts
1,855
Likes
334
Giving this a necro-bump rather than starting a new thread since my question is related to the three flavors of aptX but don't see it covered so far.

I have a Bluewave Get that features aptX HD on order, in corresponding with the developer, he mentioned that the Get should be backwards compatible with regular aptX and aptX Low Latency (LL), it'll use the corresponding codec depending on the paired device and what is being played (e.g. if video, it should automatically use aptX LL).

I recently got the V30 and when paired with Mixcder's HD601 (which features aptX LL) it only connects via regular aptX. The V30 doesn't give any indication as to which codec is being used, I can only tell by the LED color on the HD601. This seems to indicate that either the V30 doesn't support aptX LL or aptX HD isn't backwards compatible with it. Would anyone know for sure?

TIA!,
Tim
The V30 doesn't support aptX HD or aptX LL. Funnily enough though, the V20 does support aptX HD.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13958132
Post #426 of 460

cityle

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
258
Reaction score
31
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
258
Likes
31
Also, you can look in the developer options of your phone. Under the networking section, you can see which codec is currently used.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13958196
Post #427 of 460

turbobb

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
446
Reaction score
182
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Posts
446
Likes
182
     Share This Post       
post-13958204
Post #428 of 460

Dulalala

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
1,855
Reaction score
334
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Posts
1,855
Likes
334
     Share This Post       
post-13958262
Post #429 of 460

cityle

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
258
Reaction score
31
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
258
Likes
31
I've enabled Dev Options but would you mind telling me where can I see which codec is in use?
You go to Bluetooth Audio Codec in the Developer options and there you can establish which codec to use by default (if possible) and it displays which codec is currently used when you're currently using a bluetooth device. And there is other settings, like when you're using LDAC like me to decide between adaptive bitrates, prioritize connection, and prioritize quality.

And another useful setting is Disable absolute volume, which allows you to crank up to max the bluetooth volume on your device and adjust the volume on your headphone separately afterward, allowing for a more granular control of the volume.
Screenshot_20180106-125753.pngScreenshot_20180106-125748.png
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: LajostheHun
post-13958270
Post #430 of 460

turbobb

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
446
Reaction score
182
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Posts
446
Likes
182
@cityle - ah, it seems to be only available w/Oreo, I'm still on Nougat... Can't wait til they release Oreo for the V30. Thanks for pointing this out, very helpful!
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-13958776
Post #431 of 460

LajostheHun

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
738
Reaction score
129
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Posts
738
Likes
129
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-13959090
Post #432 of 460

turbobb

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
446
Reaction score
182
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Posts
446
Likes
182
Bummer, LG support just got back to me stating that the V30 doesn't support Low Latency. It's weird that they wouldn't have included this as well. I've read that aptX HD's latency can be adjusted (to as low as 1ms vs. LL's 32ms) but does anyone know what the native latency is? Any experiences you can share re: audio sync while watching video?
 
     Share This Post       
post-13975709
Post #433 of 460

Michial

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 9, 2017
Messages
113
Reaction score
17
Location
Seattle
Joined
Dec 9, 2017
Location
Seattle
Posts
113
Likes
17
I’ve listened to the highest quality on the WH100XM2 and the same on my B&O H6 Gen 2 with wires, and the H6 produces a far superior sound than Bluetooth. Perhaps as was suggested when 5.0 is ubiquitous it will exactly the same as wired, until then I think not.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13975866
Post #434 of 460

LajostheHun

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
738
Reaction score
129
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Posts
738
Likes
129
I’ve listened to the highest quality on the WH100XM2 and the same on my B&O H6 Gen 2 with wires, and the H6 produces a far superior sound than Bluetooth. Perhaps as was suggested when 5.0 is ubiquitous it will exactly the same as wired, until then I think not.
That's like listening to 2 different speakers , not to mention your confirmation bias.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13976317
Post #435 of 460

turbobb

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
446
Reaction score
182
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Posts
446
Likes
182
That's like listening to 2 different speakers...
+1 to this

@Michial - I assume that by highest quality you mean either aptX HD or LDAC and I get that you're trying to convey that wireless can't (yet) compete with wired but your example is really an apples to oranges comparison. I'll be honest that I have a tough time distinguishing between regular aptX and wired using the same headphone (leaving out the subtle differences due to powered vs. passive) so I'm quite happy with the state of BT at the moment but that's not to say I don't look forward to continued improvements. Even if I can't distinguish them, it satisfies me mentally... :)

It's my opinion that in a blind study where participants do not know the make or model of a headphone with a fake wire connected to one of the better BT cans (by this, I mean ones that don't have tell tale white noise, hiss or connection blips), most participants wouldn't be able to tell if that connection was truly wired or BT (stay thy pitch forks, I said most... :) lol)
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top