soozieq
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2007
- Posts
- 3,210
- Likes
- 20
[size=small]OMG!!! MINE HAVE JUST ARRIVED AT MY LOCAL DEPOT. [/size]
I'm going to have them in a few hours!!! OMG!
I'm going to have them in a few hours!!! OMG!
Originally Posted by soozieq /img/forum/go_quote.gif [size=small]OMG!!! MINE HAVE JUST ARRIVED AT MY LOCAL DEPOT. [/size] I'm going to have them in a few hours!!! OMG! |
Originally Posted by soozieq /img/forum/go_quote.gif [size=small]OMG!!! MINE HAVE JUST ARRIVED AT MY LOCAL DEPOT. [/size] I'm going to have them in a few hours!!! OMG! |
Originally Posted by soozieq /img/forum/go_quote.gif [size=small]OMG!!! MINE HAVE JUST ARRIVED AT MY LOCAL DEPOT. [/size] I'm going to have them in a few hours!!! OMG! |
Originally Posted by wwyjoe /img/forum/go_quote.gif Ok folks, just received my Westone 3 today!! A very quick listen to my current fav track (Coldplay 'Viva La Vida', apple lossless) and within minutes, i can easily conclude that i prefer Westone 3 over Sennheiser IE 8. I suck at writing reviews but i fully concur with Headphone Addict on his observations of the W3: 1) As Headphone Addict pointed out, "The W3 bass has great texture, and is very detailed and quick." While i felt that there is slightly more bass with the IE8, 'Refined' is another word i would use to describe W3's bass. 2) "The midrange is tonally rich, and a little forward rather than recessed, and therefore more engaging". Couldn't agree more! The violin and piano arrangements in 'Viva La Vida' just sounds more musical than IE8. 3) "The highs are smooth and detailed, and crisp with a nice sparkle" Concur! Chris Martin's vocals vocals just seem to sound clearer! While the Sennheiser IE8 are very very good earphones (to me, quite a step up when compared to Klipsch Image X10), I'm definitely keeping my W3 and putting up my IE8 for sale. Oh another thing, also loved the comfort of the W3 over IE8. The curvy shape nudges well with my ears and single flange medium silicon tips provide the best isolation / comfort. Just my humble observations |
Originally Posted by SilverB /img/forum/go_quote.gif You guys are so lucky Your item left the United States from ISC CHICAGO IL (USPS) at 4:37 PM on November 28, 2008. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later. My pair have not even reached my country yet :'( SilverB |
Originally Posted by soozieq /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hey, I remember USPS being useless about updating any information! Find out who the carrier will be when they arrive in your country, and then put the tracking number into their website. In the UK, the carrier is Parcelforce, so I track USPS packages through their own site. Once, I had a package that took 10 days to get from the US to the UK, and USPS didn't update the info until it landed in the UK. |
Originally Posted by soozieq /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hey, I remember USPS being useless about updating any information! Find out who the carrier will be when they arrive in your country, and then put the tracking number into their website. In the UK, the carrier is Parcelforce, so I track USPS packages through their own site. Once, I had a package that took 10 days to get from the US to the UK, and USPS didn't update the info until it landed in the UK. |
Originally Posted by epithetless /img/forum/go_quote.gif Ha...I actually never fathomed I'd be treating myself to such tippy-top-of-the-line IEMs -- and so soon after their release -- but that's what this place does to people, I suppose. It renders us insane. |
Originally Posted by britishbornazn /img/forum/go_quote.gif quick question for those who've received their w3's already and have had the um1 or um2's. is it just me? or does the cord seem a lot softer/more flexible? I noticed that the w3's have less twists (or braids... I don't know what to call them) in the cord than the um1's do. just wondering if this was supposed to be this way or not. |