Quote:
Originally Posted by woof37 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
No, do tell. Must have been an ethics issue.
|
I've got no idea! I know there was some kind of argument between one mod and a lot of forum folk in a "Is the Ananta as good as the GS" thread, then he was banned and de-modded. Not sure what happened to the other guy though. I'm hunting through old threads to find out what's up.
Oh, also ka-boom, I found this after reading your post on the Omega forum:
http://omega.watchprosite.com/show-n...ost/ti-424991/
I'm gonna steer clear of that thread since it's stirred up some kind of weird hive, and I'm not sure why. I think the 2500 has a lot of pretty die-hard fans... and they don't want it besmirched. Eh. I take a little issue with the guy bringing up the 1861, but he's normally kind of a jackass and not worth the trouble. It certainly had issues at the start; mostly due to the wrong kind of lubrication being used. The new versions seem rock solid. I thought of that desert trip post in particular because it made ME want an AT, and it's rare that you see an Omega treated as harshly as they COULD be these days.
You should also take a good look at Jeremy Clarkson on Top Gear. He's worn a Planet Ocean 45mm (also a 2500) through immensely harsh conditions in the Arctic, African desert, and numerous other bumpy and tough situations. Funny that a goofy and kind of clumsy giant who plays no sports like him could prove the reliability of a sports watch.
Long story short, I'm like you. I've had a couple of Omegas and never had a technical issue, even after numerous bumps and bangs. I think as long as you avoid a 33xx chronograph, you're going to be very happy for a very long time.