Chrispy
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2007
- Posts
- 493
- Likes
- 10
He rated the koss clipz, the $10 ones, pretty highly
Originally Posted by MaloS /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think the KSC75 revealed how bad his DAP sounds. |
Originally Posted by MaloS /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think the KSC75 revealed how bad his DAP sounds. |
Originally Posted by souperman /img/forum/go_quote.gif Indeed. |
In addition, sound quality is at a bare minimum. |
Originally Posted by QQQ /img/forum/go_quote.gif This_is_the_most_idiotic_headphone_related_website . In comparison, CNET are the head-fi. They wrote about KSC-75: It's more likely that reviewer's brain activity is at bare minimum. |
Originally Posted by MaloS View Post I think the KSC75 revealed how bad his DAP sounds. Originally Posted by souperman View Post Indeed. x3. I prefer the balanced yet fun sound of the KSC75 to most other expensive 'phones. Perhaps the reviewer was listening to badly ripped files of dubious origin, and the 75s revealed them for what they were. |
Originally Posted by BruteFM /img/forum/go_quote.gif They fit poorly, they're flimsy, and they don't sound all that great. Distorted and tinny are a decent enough description of the sound. What exactly did he say about these that is incorrect? 1/10 may be low, but it's not far off the mark. I'd give them a 3/10 at best. |