Want fun?? KSC 75 got 1\10 rating!
Oct 8, 2008 at 9:06 AM Post #19 of 61
i give ksc75 4.5/5 if im not mistaken that is about 9/10 hehe
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 9:09 AM Post #20 of 61
oh 1 year later
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 9:26 AM Post #21 of 61
Quote:

Originally Posted by MaloS /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I think the KSC75 revealed how bad his DAP sounds.


Quote:

Originally Posted by souperman /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Indeed.


x3. I prefer the balanced yet fun sound of the KSC75 to most other expensive 'phones.
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 10:10 AM Post #22 of 61
Hmm. Old post. But oh, why not? The link to the review still works. Perhaps the reviewer was listening to badly ripped files of dubious origin, and the 75s revealed them for what they were.
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 10:12 AM Post #23 of 61
This_is_the_most_idiotic_headphone_related_website . In comparison, CNET are the head-fi.

They wrote about KSC-75: Quote:

In addition, sound quality is at a bare minimum.


It's more likely that reviewer's brain activity is at bare minimum.
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 10:23 AM Post #24 of 61
Quote:

Originally Posted by QQQ /img/forum/go_quote.gif
This_is_the_most_idiotic_headphone_related_website . In comparison, CNET are the head-fi.

They wrote about KSC-75:
It's more likely that reviewer's brain activity is at bare minimum.



Ooh, wait wait, I gotta consult my chart here:

oh-snap-chart-.jpg


wink.gif
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM Post #25 of 61
Quote:

Originally Posted by MaloS View Post

I think the KSC75 revealed how bad his DAP sounds.

Originally Posted by souperman View Post

Indeed.

x3. I prefer the balanced yet fun sound of the KSC75 to most other expensive 'phones.
Perhaps the reviewer was listening to badly ripped files of dubious origin, and the 75s revealed them for what they were.


I'm not buying into this since they ranked PX-100 good... And they ranked HD 280(!) 5\5 so there're much more serious problems than just poor quality source with them.
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 12:06 PM Post #26 of 61
I think someone messed up. The KSC75 is great. The reviewer however talks about Sportclip Headphones, which are the KSC7 which are not the same as the 75s. He did pay 20$ for them so they're probably 75s. Hmm, the guy must be dumb.
tongue.gif
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 2:50 PM Post #28 of 61
They fit poorly, they're flimsy, and they don't sound all that great. Distorted and tinny are a decent enough description of the sound.
What exactly did he say about these that is incorrect?

1/10 may be low, but it's not far off the mark. I'd give them a 3/10 at best.
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 3:28 PM Post #29 of 61
Quote:

Originally Posted by BruteFM /img/forum/go_quote.gif
They fit poorly, they're flimsy, and they don't sound all that great. Distorted and tinny are a decent enough description of the sound.
What exactly did he say about these that is incorrect?

1/10 may be low, but it's not far off the mark. I'd give them a 3/10 at best.



Wow, you must be his cousin or something.
tongue.gif
 
Oct 8, 2008 at 3:44 PM Post #30 of 61

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top