I cannot believe it or not as my own knowledge about physics and chemistry of the vacuum tube is insufficient. From my own experience in epistemology and scientific methods, I can only guess what is plausible. The issue at hand is not deep science. When I read the text I have posted from Wiki, it makes sense to me in the context that we have been discussing. I do not see how it is fuzzy, not even in the sense of logic (Lotfi Zadeh). I would appreciate a simple explanation why you believe it does not make sense, based on your knowledge, i.e. a straightforward explanation why my supposition, based on the quote from Wiki, supported by 5 references, is wrong, rather than an unsubstantiated dismissal. I promise to try hard to overcome my ignorance to understand it.
It is my opinion, as a Music Listener first, and a person concerned with measurements and comparisons, way further down the list, what comes out of the transducers is the most important factor.
Whether a village of tiny elves or an electrolytic device is the process that a signal goes through to get to the transducers is of little importance to me. I am not knowledgeable to argue, nor would I be easily convinced, if either side of the argument involves the need to understand esoteric aspects of the process.
Like the discussions of coffee on another thread brought forth several differing views, I deduced what works for me, and am enjoying the result. Could a better cup of coffee be possible--sure. Is the cup I am making with a hand-grinder from locally roasted beans better than Walmart $5.00/big can pre-ground, no doubt.
When I tell the Audacious player to let me listen to a recording of Solti or Karajan, it is only the Music from the transducers that matters, and I have a profound opinion about that. For everyone else, Your Mileage May Vary.
And now for a subject totally unrelated to audio, but seemingly apropos to this discussion is "set and setting". Both Timothy Leary and Terrence McKenna, in the discussion of hallucinogenic substances, emphasize both "Set and Setting" as being the critical factor whether the subject has a pleasant experience during the "trip" or a "bad trip" with all other factors being equal.
Perception is affected by both set and setting, altered perception equally so.
If you start your listening experience, still stewing about a jack-ass cutting you off in traffic, versus coming home in a copacetic mood, content and ready to listen--the perception of the music will be different.
If the angry listener has Imagined Dragons, while the contented listener floats away with the second movement to a blissful state--does the age of the tube really matter?