- Joined
- Feb 23, 2011
- Posts
- 16,423
- Likes
- 3,173
And here I was waiting for Black Friday to get the UERM...
... I will most likely need both the UERM and the UERR... and that using them in conjunction will give me a better insight into the music than either one alone.
Just to clarify... Is the UERM-R a replacement for the UERM or not? I just read multiple posts that seem to have conflicting info... If what I read was correct, it seems to be a "different saw blades/teeth" concept, rather than a new, better, replacement set?
Thanks!
When you guys (you/ethan/jude) get a chance, do post comparisons between the two. I got UERM and love its neutrality. Wonder if I would need/want the UERR.
Is there a list of 3D scan providers?
saw there was a mic model. is that a smartphone mic? iOS or Android?
Are UE monitors in general available as universal?
Being one of the (seemingly few) head-fiers with no interest in customs, I wish more of the high end IEM guys would follow JH and Noble's lead into making universal versions of their best products... they make them for demoing anyway, why not offer it as a product line?
On a personal note, nothing against further improvement of a superb IEM, but am I the only one who thinks the "Made for Hi-Res" marketing ploy is getting stale pretty fast?
You have to remember, UE makes a lot of products for actual music professionals out there, and that's likely their main target audience, not just audio enthusiasts. The UERM and probably UERR are no exception. Most pros require the use of in-ear monitors to be used....as monitors and especially when on stage where isolation is needed, in which usually only a custom fit earpiece would be appropriate. My guess is that the universal demo units are meant exactly for that, a demo. I got to tour UE's headquarters in Irvine a few months ago and there were two customers in there who were getting UE products for their professional musician lives: one was a drummer, another was a singer.
And yes, I got to demo the universal version of the UERM on their testing setup. Having custom in-ears likely benefits the customer too in that they get a near-guarantee that the sound will sound the same each time they use it as opposed to a universal version where "tip-rolling" or ear canal shape can affect the sound. My guess is that they want their products having consistent behaviour with everyone who uses them, and eliminating ear canal shape and "tip-rolling" is only possible with custom fits.
From what I can see, JH Audio's universal in-ears aren't necessarily geared towards the pro audio audience (hence why none of their Pro series products are offered in universal fit) and are likely more towards the audio enthusiast, much like Noble's products.
Nope, you're not the only one. "Hi-res" and "Remaster" sound more like marketing gimmicks to me unfortunately, not matter how benign it might be on intention. As I've stated before, remastered stuff tends to not be so great from my experience, and it's the master that makes far more of a difference in sound quality than any format like 24/384.