Gatto
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Posts
- 1,410
- Likes
- 10
the cake is a lie
Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif Why was it off topic? I was disagreeing with the opposition between "truth" and "lie." Also, if you provide me with examples where I do not answer the OP, I'll be glad to correct myself. |
Originally Posted by ExplosiveDuck /img/forum/go_quote.gif Just curious and bored, How about 5 words or less on what Truth is: Subjective, even in the past. |
Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif That which is the case. It's just the correspondence theory of truth. A proposition, p, is true if and only if it corresponds to some fact. Or p is true if and only if it corresponds to some state of affairs that obtains. |
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed. |
Originally Posted by ZephyrSapphire /img/forum/go_quote.gif There you go. In summary: Topic: Truth in 5 words or less What people are suppose to reply with: Truth in 5 words or less NOT the extra mumbo jumbo you said after your reply. Truth: Keep It Clean And Simple |
Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif Ah, I didn't see a "no commentary" sign. In fact, I still don't. I did provide my definition in 5 words or less, and didn't realize that saying more was wrong. I'm still not sure it is, you know, since your additional comments imply that you think it's OK. |
Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hs it caused conflict? Just you, right? |
Originally Posted by ExplosiveDuck /img/forum/go_quote.gif Just curious and bored, How about 5 words or less on what Truth is: Subjective, even in the past. |
Originally Posted by ZephyrSapphire /img/forum/go_quote.gif The fact that people are replying to your "additional" comments is already conflict being formed. |
Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif Replying entails conflict? |