Which trinity IEM was your favorite?The Hunters didn't sould like any other trinity IEM that I've owned. Very cold and bright. It wasn't for me so I sent them back.
For me it had to be Delta VII so far. But Vyrus 2 I should've gotten.
Which trinity IEM was your favorite?The Hunters didn't sould like any other trinity IEM that I've owned. Very cold and bright. It wasn't for me so I sent them back.
Delta VII for sound and Hunter had the best fit.Which trinity IEM was your favorite?
For me it had to be Delta VII so far. But Vyrus 2 I should've gotten.
The Hunters didn't sould like any other trinity IEM that I've owned. Very cold and bright. It wasn't for me so I sent them back.
Belgium. The PM6 are big, I mean BIG. But rather comfortable to wear (I use spiral dot MS), with goo seal and light. I have used it for a couple of hours so not much burn in (for people who believe in it, i kind of) first impressions are a mixed bag.
Sound wise, and I not sensitive to it, be prepared for a fight with sibilance. I tried black, green, gold (both versions), purple, sibilance is just too much for me to bear. I have now the gunmetal on and it is finally ok.
So with gunmetal on, the sound is rather bright and cold. Somewhat more than I expected. Also I feel they do not like to be driven high since the lows breaks easily and sibilance is back at high volumes. Staging is decent and detail ok.
At this stage I do not see me enjoying them over my periodic audio Be and, yes shot me down, even the vyrus2 (ouch).
I hope other filters and some burn in will change things.
How does the detail compare between the Periodic Audio Be and the PM6?
The Be and the PM6 are truly different IEM. Be is warmer and more emotional (to steal bob wording). The lows of the Be are (at least for me) impossible to surpass if not with IEM above the 1000s. They are truly a thing of beauty.
The PM6 are colder and brighter. Depending on what is playing the Be show more details or the pm6. But my Be got burned for a while, pm6 only 2-3 hours. They have similar staging/3d feeling.
Fit wise the pm6 are way better despite being bigger.
PS: Disclaimer, my ears are average.
Can someone tell me What keiren's email is? I guess I missed it
Awesome I didn't check the website, mental fog on my side. Thank youCopied from the Trinity website:
For all UK and European enquiries please email: jake@trinityaudioengineering.com
For the rest of the world please email: kieran@trinityaudioengineering.com
The Be and the PM6 are truly different IEM. Be is warmer and more emotional (to steal bob wording). The lows of the Be are (at least for me) impossible to surpass if not with IEM above the 1000s. They are truly a thing of beauty.
The PM6 are colder and brighter. Depending on what is playing the Be show more details or the pm6. But my Be got burned for a while, pm6 only 2-3 hours. They have similar staging/3d feeling.
Fit wise the pm6 are way better despite being bigger.
PS: Disclaimer, my ears are average.
The Be and the PM6 are truly different IEM. Be is warmer and more emotional (to steal bob wording). The lows of the Be are (at least for me) impossible to surpass if not with IEM above the 1000s. They are truly a thing of beauty.
The PM6 are colder and brighter. Depending on what is playing the Be show more details or the pm6. But my Be got burned for a while, pm6 only 2-3 hours. They have similar staging/3d feeling.
Fit wise the pm6 are way better despite being bigger.
PS: Disclaimer, my ears are average.
The Be and the PM6 are truly different IEM. Be is warmer and more emotional (to steal bob wording). The lows of the Be are (at least for me) impossible to surpass if not with IEM above the 1000s. They are truly a thing of beauty.
The PM6 are colder and brighter. Depending on what is playing the Be show more details or the pm6. But my Be got burned for a while, pm6 only 2-3 hours. They have similar staging/3d feeling.
Fit wise the pm6 are way better despite being bigger.
PS: Disclaimer, my ears are average.