Jeff Graw
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2007
- Posts
- 154
- Likes
- 55
We have tried to always listen on head-fi and we have tried to accommodate so much and cater for almost every option we have made it almost impossible for ourselves, so we had to draw a line in the sand and say we are going to do it how we think is best.
I don't think it's as much of a head-fi thing as it is a "the entire market" thing. Consumers, and not just the vocal minority here on head-fi, prefer fully replaceable cables. They like the choice it provides, and the peace of mind that they give. No one trusts IEM cables either. You could make the best IEM cables ever that last a lifetime, but you won't have much luck erasing that stigma. Not to mention if someone does a google search about the integrity of your cables, they're liable to come up with a bad impression. While the semi-replaceable cable may work OK for some market segments, at the really high end people expect fully replaceable cables. And even if the warranty and service is excellent, only people on head-fi are going to be aware of that, and even then no one likes sending things in to the manufacturer. There's a good reason why only a tiny minority of IEMs use cables that terminate at the Y-split instead of at each IEM (and no TOTL that I'm aware of, although I don't follow IEMs nearly as much as regular headphones), and that it hasn't caught on to wider usage.
While I'm sure you have good technical reasons for wanting the change, I can't help but feel it's a huge mistake from a business perspective.
But that's the beautiful thing about having a fully replaceable cable using an industry standard connection. You don't need to accommodate anyone. If they don't like your cable solution, they can just go ahead and use their own. For example, if you still terminated at the Y-split but also terminated at each IEM, anyone that disliked that could just buy go buy a different cable that doesn't have the y-split termination.