TooPoorForHiFi
Previously known as MidNighTempest
ReQuest
Final Audio A8000
&
Final Audio A7000
Vs.
Z1R
Final Audio A8000
&
Final Audio A7000
Vs.
Z1R
![]() |
![]() |
Cutting-edge artisanal in-ear monitors for discerning listeners. Proudly designed and manufactured in Singapore.
Stay updated on Subtonic Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
any first impression?!
Massdrop Edition?
any first impression?!
![]() |
![]() |
Cutting-edge artisanal in-ear monitors for discerning listeners. Proudly designed and manufactured in Singapore.
Stay updated on Subtonic Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cutting-edge artisanal in-ear monitors for discerning listeners. Proudly designed and manufactured in Singapore.
Stay updated on Subtonic Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cutting-edge artisanal in-ear monitors for discerning listeners. Proudly designed and manufactured in Singapore.
Stay updated on Subtonic Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
First Impressions: Obravo Cupid
Very warm sounding IEM. It's warm to the point that vocals sound muffled and blanketed. Bass isn't even good either - average punch with tom/snare drums. Hell, even the drums feel like they have a blanket over them. High level of smearing and barely has any definition with its transients. Highs are on the darker side yet peaky & thin at the same time. It's simultaneously blunted and peaky. It's not absolute garbage, but very far from being a decent IEM.
Thanks man, appreciate the honest assessment of the Cupid. I'd read a lot on it, and at one point was pretty close to pulling the trigger to try out a pair. Glad I didn't.
First Impressions: BLON BL-03
I'm aware of the hype it gets. Some claim it to be the flagship killer, some claim it to be the best thing ever. You get the idea. The expectation bias is there for me. The BL-03 isn't that good. The BL-03 also has unit variance issues to my knowledge.
The bass is bloated and its transients moderately smeared. It does have a really decent midrange tone. Treble peaks a bit early but the tone of the treble with cymbals are fine. It sounds pretty low dynamics despite the bassier tuning. Technicalities are pretty average as well and I'd even go as far as to say that the stage is mostly dominated by it's midbass. Perhaps this would be better if they dialed down the bass. The BL-03 isn't bad, but it's not as impressive as it was led to be. It's pretty average for what it is, and bonus points for getting the midrange right. I tried the Tin T4 right before I tried the BLON, and it's safe to say that I much prefer the T4s in all aspects.
Think there are some definite differences of opinion on the Cupid. I definitely fall much more in line with @twister6 's thoughts ( https://twister6.com/2019/07/25/obravo-cupid/ ) as I find it a very enjoyable listen, and one which picks a pretty decent bass slam. Not meant as a way to start a dispute or challenge how Toranku hears it (it is his thread, after all), but just to highlight this seems to be an IEM that some people hear very differently to others. Guess that's the beauty of our hobby.![]()
Cupid is just ridiculously, hilariously tip and fit sensitive. That's a downside of it, but it sounds wonderful when you do get not only a good fit, but the RIGHT fit.
How I get the right fit:
I use the included Whirlwind tips and jam them all the way down the nozzle so that the grill sticks out and through. Then I position the Cupid such that the drivers are as close to my eardrums as possible - without creating a vacuum seal. Pressure must not be formed between the drivers and your eardrums because then the entire sound collapses. The connectors are not laying flat against my temple rather they stick out at an angle.
Once you get all the stars aligned, the portal to the future opens!![]()