- Joined
- Jun 15, 2012
- Posts
- 4,574
- Likes
- 223
Makes me want one...
you should, my wa2 is a beauty. soon i will have hd800 and then i will be very happy indeed
Makes me want one...
omg they finally released the WA2 review they promised on the LF339 review!@#!@#!
exciting **** here.
i see the words silky and smooth are used here;won't Ardilla be happy
Lieven is a indeed a review copycat
But I still like the WA2 with the LCD-2/3, though.. in a very very silky and smooth way.......
i did not think it would power them
WA2 makes any headphones it can drive sound amazing.
from 300 ohm senns to 250 and 600 ohm beyers, its all good.
Exactly for that reason I'm a bit concerned about the HD700s, being 150 ohm...Maybe not problematic at all, but perhaps not optimal...
I'm looking for an amp that could warms high and mid-high frequencies: actually I feel them too much thin and metallic with Asgard, especially on pop records.
Exactly for that reason I'm a bit concerned about the HD700s, being 150 ohm...Maybe not problematic at all, but perhaps not optimal...
I'm looking for an amp that could warms high and mid-high frequencies: actually I feel them too much thin and metallic with Asgard, especially on pop records.
i did not think it would power them
Yeah makes audezes very thick and tubey analog sounding, quite lush. If you like detail speed and dynamics from the lcd-2 definitely not recommended. For listening at a modest volume and wanting a laid back presentation, its pretty good.
Totally spot on in the bulls eye indeed
What you're saying is you're not satisfied until every bit of detail is distorted away? Haha. WA2 is not my top pic for LCD-2 and -3, but I find the amp quite extraordinary with D7000 – that's lushness at its best.
Dubstepgirl, I have two pair of 6AS7G but both are humming a bit (which I've heard is quite common). Are 6AS7G from RCA known to be more silent or should the tubes lie within some threshold measurement wise? If so, do you (or anyone else) know the threshold?