The Watercooler -- Impressions, philosophical discussion and general banter. Index on first page. All welcome.

Apr 24, 2025 at 8:26 PM Post #106,366 of 106,606
While other brands keep thinking of cramming more drivers into one shell, which is to be fair they need to work with what they got, we have brands like Final who rather do their own thing. Finall A10000 is a single driver IEM, which is built by rather unique driver type, diamond. I have no idea whether that is a good thing or bad, but this article rather highlight, to my surprise, how much it takes to develop such a driver. We are talking about in-house voice coil driver, german firm who developed the diamond driver (real diamond) which than was given to another contractor to figure out how to have it bonding with the edge which connected to the voice coil.

https://ascii.jp/elem/000/004/265/4265624/
Looking at cost per driver, this is far more expensive than other brand, but we are talking abou R&D across two firms and in-house R&D. I'm more excited about long term application of this driver.

I've recently went back to FW01 and wm1am2. I simply love the sound of single dd far more than anything else.

https://final-inc.com/?srsltid=AfmBOorYTAAIYMw_L2iH3lCIHz7tPKx2xmwmJenNb2_rzsAxx_9qujJ_

I didn’t read the article thoroughly, only quickly glanced, but it’s definitely interesting the concept of using diamonds on the driver. Not the first time this has been done. B&W in the speaker realm with their tweeters.

To your first point, I definitely think there’s a danger in the thinking that more is better sometimes. More is not always better, but that’s the nature of consumer products. Loudness wars in music comes to mind; more drivers in IEMs; home theaters, more speakers, more subs, more everything; in Televisions more nits (brightness). Some companies are cramming more in almost for the sake of just having as many as possible, while other companies aren’t. I think they are doing R&D into the process either way, but some are more diligent than others, for sure. Some of the best IEMs I’ve heard to date are mixing and utilizing the strengths of different driver types to get the best sound possible, whether it is Planars, Estats, BA, Dynamics, BCD, xMeMs, etc. However, each driver type does have inherent drawbacks, timbre is either a positive or a negative, depending on who you ask, but then mixing them up certainly yields coherency concerns, hence more R&D being required.

I personally love the timbre of dynamic drivers and when done right, it really is like nothing else. Examples of this that come to mind that I’ve heard, multi or single driver configs, are Nightjar’s Duality and Singularity, CFA Trifecta, Dita Perpetua. Nightjar specifically amazes me at how well they do with dynamic drivers. So, so good. As much as I love things like NJ Duality or CFA Trifecta, they don’t rank as my top personal favorite all-rounder IEMs, though. My favorite IEMs are all multi-drivers, usually with DD handling some form of the bass (not always, though), BAs for mids, and treble is varied with either planar or estat.

I suppose that speaks to the beauty of this hobby, too, single driver, multi driver, planar, dynamic, we have choices that fit the bill for everyone’s preferences… though maybe too many choices now!
 
Apr 24, 2025 at 11:23 PM Post #106,368 of 106,606
First off let me acknowlege that this thread is 4 years old today. It's a little amazing to me how this community has grown and thrived this past few years into way more than I could have possibly imagined. It's the power of community that makes this place what it is and I tip my hat to each and every one who has contributed in any way over the past few years. Love you all. Here's to another 4 years!

That being said here are the first results from our recent survey:

Watercooler 2025 Spring Survey Results Part 1

$2k+ Bracket

The winner:

Oriolus Traillii JP x17


Let me just take a minute to acknowledge how remarkable it is-- and appropriate on this the Cooler birthday-- that after all these years the old Bird is still right at the top. Let me also point out that I did not merge the Traillii Ti votes (which were 4) into the OG. Had I done that it would have even more of a lead.

The rest:

Subtonic Storm x14
PMG APX SE x13
Mysticraft HEX x13
Brise Audio Fugaku x11
Hercules Audio Moses x11


Elysian Annihilator x9
Aroma Fei Wan x9
Forte Ears MacBeth x9
Forte Ears Mefisto x8
Unique Melody Amber Pearl x7
Alpha & Omega Omega x7
Fir Audio Rn6 x7

Canpur CP622b x6
Empire Ears Raven x6

Campfire Audio Astrolith x5
Fir Audio Xe6 x5
Noble Chronicle x4
Elysian Dio x4
Nightjar Acoustics Duality x4
AME Mousa x4
Craft Ears Omnuum x4
Quill Audio Satin x4
Oriolus Traillii Ti x4
Campfire Audio Trifecta x4
Vision Ears EXT MKii x4
Vision Ears X/VE10 x4
64 Audio Fourte x3
Aroma Jewel x3
Unique Melody Mentor x3
Dita Perpetua x3
Dita Ventura x3


AME Raven x2
7th Acoustics Asteria x2
VE/AK Aura x2
Campfire Audio Clara Ti x2
Alpha & Omega Fulgrim x2
Fat Freq Grand Maestro x2
Lime Ears Maris x2
Empire Ears Odin x2
Vision Ears Phonix x2
Noble Viking x2
Volk Audio Etoile x2
Letshouer Cadenza
Kinera Loki Emerald
Soft Ears Enigma
NG Audio Erebus
Vision Ears Erlkonig
Penon Rival
Vision Ears EXT OG
Empire Ears Legend Evo
Jomo Flamenco
Unique Melody Red Halo
Soranik Mems 3s
Unique Melody Mason
EE/AK Novus
Unique Melody Soleil Tombe
Rhapsodio Sup 3
Plussound Volta
Ice Labs Spectrumica
Steranko S40
Noble Sultan
64 Audio u18t
Vision Ears VE8
64 Audio Tia Trio
This is excellent Jeff! What's also amazing is your passion for this hobby after four years! Kudos!

Can't wait for Part 2!
 
Apr 24, 2025 at 11:42 PM Post #106,369 of 106,606
First off let me acknowlege that this thread is 4 years old today. It's a little amazing to me how this community has grown and thrived this past few years into way more than I could have possibly imagined. It's the power of community that makes this place what it is and I tip my hat to each and every one who has contributed in any way over the past few years. Love you all. Here's to another 4 years!

That being said here are the first results from our recent survey:

Watercooler 2025 Spring Survey Results Part 1

$2k+ Bracket

The winner:

Oriolus Traillii JP x17


Let me just take a minute to acknowledge how remarkable it is-- and appropriate on this the Cooler birthday-- that after all these years the old Bird is still right at the top. Let me also point out that I did not merge the Traillii Ti votes (which were 4) into the OG. Had I done that it would have even more of a lead.

The rest:

Subtonic Storm x14
PMG APX SE x13
Mysticraft HEX x13
Brise Audio Fugaku x11
Hercules Audio Moses x11


Elysian Annihilator x9
Aroma Fei Wan x9
Forte Ears MacBeth x9
Forte Ears Mefisto x8
Unique Melody Amber Pearl x7
Alpha & Omega Omega x7
Fir Audio Rn6 x7

Canpur CP622b x6
Empire Ears Raven x6

Campfire Audio Astrolith x5
Fir Audio Xe6 x5
Noble Chronicle x4
Elysian Dio x4
Nightjar Acoustics Duality x4
AME Mousa x4
Craft Ears Omnuum x4
Quill Audio Satin x4
Oriolus Traillii Ti x4
Campfire Audio Trifecta x4
Vision Ears EXT MKii x4
Vision Ears X/VE10 x4
64 Audio Fourte x3
Aroma Jewel x3
Unique Melody Mentor x3
Dita Perpetua x3
Dita Ventura x3


AME Raven x2
7th Acoustics Asteria x2
VE/AK Aura x2
Campfire Audio Clara Ti x2
Alpha & Omega Fulgrim x2
Fat Freq Grand Maestro x2
Lime Ears Maris x2
Empire Ears Odin x2
Vision Ears Phonix x2
Noble Viking x2
Volk Audio Etoile x2
Letshouer Cadenza
Kinera Loki Emerald
Soft Ears Enigma
NG Audio Erebus
Vision Ears Erlkonig
Penon Rival
Vision Ears EXT OG
Empire Ears Legend Evo
Jomo Flamenco
Unique Melody Red Halo
Soranik Mems 3s
Unique Melody Mason
EE/AK Novus
Unique Melody Soleil Tombe
Rhapsodio Sup 3
Plussound Volta
Ice Labs Spectrumica
Steranko S40
Noble Sultan
64 Audio u18t
Vision Ears VE8
64 Audio Tia Trio
Wow, what a list! It continues the tradition of keeping things fresh while giving the longterm legends their due! Maybe the best high-end IEM lists anywhere!! Happy anniversary, Watercooler!!
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 3:04 AM Post #106,370 of 106,606
Jeff, congratulations! Keeping this thread going and alive for 4 years is no small achievement.

I remember when you and Todd told me to come over to it all those years ago. Now we give out awards at shows, and you even lured @goldwerger to create the WC Headphone Thread.

And if I may, so satisfying to see Traillii still topping the thread for 4 years and running by consistently getting new followers.

Congratulations to all members!
So actually it isn't just an ordinary bird but a phoenix, hence the long life on the ranking list 🤭
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 6:09 AM Post #106,372 of 106,606
While other brands keep thinking of cramming more drivers into one shell, which is to be fair they need to work with what they got, we have brands like Final who rather do their own thing. Finall A10000 is a single driver IEM, which is built by rather unique driver type, diamond. I have no idea whether that is a good thing or bad, but this article rather highlight, to my surprise, how much it takes to develop such a driver. We are talking about in-house voice coil driver, german firm who developed the diamond driver (real diamond) which than was given to another contractor to figure out how to have it bonding with the edge which connected to the voice coil.

https://ascii.jp/elem/000/004/265/4265624/
Looking at cost per driver, this is far more expensive than other brand, but we are talking abou R&D across two firms and in-house R&D. I'm more excited about long term application of this driver.

I've recently went back to FW01 and wm1am2. I simply love the sound of single dd far more than anything else.
Totally with you on the love for single DDs.... As for the diamond driver in the A10000, I respect the innovation and the effort behind it, but I’m still a bit skeptical if real-world performance will truly justify all that R&D. Sometimes exotic materials sound better on paper than in the ear, you know? Again i havent been fortunate enough to try and assess these so take my words with a bit of salt.
it’s definitely interesting the concept of using diamonds on the driver. Not the first time this has been done. B&W in the speaker realm with their tweeters.

To your first point, I definitely think there’s a danger in the thinking that more is better sometimes. More is not always better, but that’s the nature of consumer products. Loudness wars in music comes to mind; more drivers in IEMs; home theaters, more speakers, more subs, more everything; in Televisions more nits (brightness). Some companies are cramming more in almost for the sake of just having as many as possible, while other companies aren’t. I think they are doing R&D into the process either way, but some are more diligent than others, for sure. Some of the best IEMs I’ve heard to date are mixing and utilizing the strengths of different driver types to get the best sound possible, whether it is Planars, Estats, BA, Dynamics, BCD, xMeMs, etc. However, each driver type does have inherent drawbacks, timbre is either a positive or a negative, depending on who you ask, but then mixing them up certainly yields coherency concerns, hence more R&D being required.

I personally love the timbre of dynamic drivers and when done right, it really is like nothing else. Examples of this that come to mind that I’ve heard, multi or single driver configs, are Nightjar’s Duality and Singularity, CFA Trifecta, Dita Perpetua. Nightjar specifically amazes me at how well they do with dynamic drivers. So, so good. As much as I love things like NJ Duality or CFA Trifecta, they don’t rank as my top personal favorite all-rounder IEMs, though. My favorite IEMs are all multi-drivers, usually with DD handling some form of the bass (not always, though), BAs for mids, and treble is varied with either planar or estat.

I suppose that speaks to the beauty of this hobby, too, single driver, multi driver, planar, dynamic, we have choices that fit the bill for everyone’s preferences… though maybe too many choices now!
Yeah, you nailed it...there’s definitely a fine line between innovation and just chasing numbers for the spec sheet. I totally get the appeal of mixing driver types to bring out the best in each range, and when it’s done right, it can sound phenomenal. But like you said, coherency can take a hit, and that’s where I feel single DDs still shine...they just have that effortless timbre and naturalness that’s hard to replicate. I’m with you: it’s not that more drivers are bad, just that more doesn’t automatically mean better. In the end, it’s about execution, not the parts count. And yeah… too many choices, not enough ears (or$$$)! 😅
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 9:10 AM Post #106,374 of 106,606
Lol i used to play the crap out of this demo on the Halo 1 game. The jumping/hurdle one used to get intense!
That's exactly the mini game that comes to mind when I think of this one! So many great memories of battling it out with my dad and brother. Oh simpler times...
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 9:10 AM Post #106,375 of 106,606
That's exactly the mini game that comes to mind when I think of this one! So many great memories of battling it out with my dad and brother. Oh simpler times...

FUSSSIOONNNNN FRENZZZZYYYYY!
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 10:01 AM Post #106,376 of 106,606
Totally with you on the love for single DDs.... As for the diamond driver in the A10000, I respect the innovation and the effort behind it, but I’m still a bit skeptical if real-world performance will truly justify all that R&D. Sometimes exotic materials sound better on paper than in the ear, you know? Again i havent been fortunate enough to try and assess these so take my words with a bit of salt.

Yeah, you nailed it...there’s definitely a fine line between innovation and just chasing numbers for the spec sheet. I totally get the appeal of mixing driver types to bring out the best in each range, and when it’s done right, it can sound phenomenal. But like you said, coherency can take a hit, and that’s where I feel single DDs still shine...they just have that effortless timbre and naturalness that’s hard to replicate. I’m with you: it’s not that more drivers are bad, just that more doesn’t automatically mean better. In the end, it’s about execution, not the parts count. And yeah… too many choices, not enough ears (or$$$)! 😅
In the end, single DDs are all about the materials used. Everything from the type of magnet used, the voice coil, acoustic chambers, diaphragm material, dome material, shell material, nozzle material, etc. affect the final tuning and technical performance.

I love when brands experiment with new single DD designs, so would love to try the A10000 if given the chance:L3000:.

My most recent experience with TOTL single DDs was the Acoustune HS2000MX MKiii, with its Myrinx driver with beryllium coating and pure silver chamber. Honestly, I would buy it if I could, as it it's one of the widest sounding IEMs I've ever tried.
 

Attachments

  • 20250407_185355.jpg
    20250407_185355.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 0
Apr 25, 2025 at 1:29 PM Post #106,377 of 106,606
All this talk of single DD drivers comes up every so often especially when a great release occurs, think perpetua and singularity. But the frontiers keep being pushed with this technology and the drivers do continue to evolve. And prices continue to cover all ranges, with Dita releasing Ventura at a price even higher than Perpy, and Meze with its excellent Alba for about $150.

Yesterday, I received an unknown to me single DD, the EarAcoustic Silver Angel LE that retails for a little over $400, right in the same range as the also excellent Timsok single DD. Apparently, EarAcoustic has released this like a Chevy with multiple trims, but instead, multiple types of DDs and different tunings ranging from about $150 to $450. Seems confusing to me, but it's all about the single DD from these guys, so might be worth a look for DD officionados. Their DD design doesn't look very standard.

In initial listen, the one I have sounds a lot like Dita Mecha did. Which is a fun and engaging listen, if not my favorite. I do like it enough that it's getting the flight test next week....5 hours in a plane 🙃! Will be interesting to hear from others how the other trims sound! And it's quite the bling if you're into that🤑!
1000093132.jpg
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 1:33 PM Post #106,378 of 106,606
Time to update the signature, PMG APX SE landed a few long hours ago! Thank you @warrenj <3

I won't be posting reviews and long impressions for it, because we're almost at the next iteration at this point, but rather a general discussion on sound signatures, preferences and so on.

I'll also use this post to offer my perspective on the Moses and how it stacks up compared to the first giga flagship I've heard since the Traillii (and you know my thoughts on that :D)

Even though the impressions might not make it sound that way, I think the APX SE is an absolute world class monster of a monitor based on my first listen. At the same time, either the Moses is underpriced, or 6000$ is just too much for an IEM

Either way, let's proceed with the actual impressions, served as a comparison post! (throwback to the Thummim vs Erl post and the shitstorm that it started)

Tuning

The bass on the APX SE is flat out the best I've ever heard in an IEM, in both quantity and quality. It isn't midbass shy as too many monitors are, it delivers plenty of punch, a little decay to remain fun, and that outrageous planar speed. It goes deep, has excellent rumble, and is perfect in quantity - just enough to make it enjoyable and engaging, but not so much that it becomes overwhelming.

The Moses has the kind of bass that would become the star of the show at a Canjam, but in my ever so humble opinion, starts feeling a little extra after a while. It's fun, it's slow, it's satisfying, and will perform very well with any test track where you want to hear that oomph. While it does border on the too much at times, I don't think that's the main issue, but rather how almost-sluggish it feels. Again, extremely satisfying, just not something I'd want to listen to all day every day. Works great for some genres, not so well for others

I also don't love how diffused the punch of the Moses is, but I guess if it punched hard with this quantity you'd just end up with another Xe6

The Moses and APX SE have very comparable mids Imo, with the main difference being that the APX SE leans a little more into the lower midrange, while the Moses leans ever so gently into the upper midrange. The APX SE has extremely pleasant texture, and that more laidback presentation that I crave, with an overall colder feel despite the texture (I feel like the upper treble is giving a midly metallic feel to both IEMs)

The Moses is a little more euphonic and more forward, which sounds great with a lot of genres, but becomes a little problematic for me with Florence and the Machine's King album for example, where it definitely becomes too much.

The treble is very similar tuning-wise on both IEMs. Both have a very safe and tame lower treble, with massive upper treble bumps. Some people love it, some people hate it, it is what it is I guess. I do agree it's a bit of gimmick to give the sense of detail without harshness, and to define the space and imaging better, but it really works for me. I guess all these years on 64A IEMs have made me an upper treble fiend, unable to live without it.

The tuning TLDR is basically the following: both IEMs feel like two flavors of the same super broad tuning direction (warm-neutral and inoffensive, with safe lower treble and gobs of upper treble)

Moses: slower, more fun and drawn out, with some incoherence issues because of the cleaner midrange and treble, contrasted with the slower and thicker bass

APX SE: Clean, tight and laidback neutral, extremely coherent across the spectrum, with incredible speed and texture despite the colder presentation

Technical Ability

This is where I have some hot takes. Tuning alone can't justify pricing, and once you cross that 2000$ mark, I start having some big expectations where it comes to technical ability.

I would divide them up this way:

- Moses has the biggest, most open staging I've ever heard, with some of the most jawdropping imaging I've experienced. The APX SE isn't bad, it's great. It's wide, it's tall, it's decently holographic, it's just nowhere near the Moses

- Detail goes to the APX SE, because it's able to separate instruments and vocals way better than the Moses. The speed of the APX SE just gives it just a big edge over the Moses, it's able to transmit all the information flawlessly, even if it comes at the expense of some of that fun at times.

- Dynamics are comparable, the Moses has an extremely dark background, but again, that decay can interfere with the perception at times. The APX SE is among the very best I've heard. Not quite Erl level, but right up there

Build, stock cable, accessories

I don't dislike the APX SE's shells, but they feel a little basic compared to the Moses. Not a fully fair comparison, because Moses is almost like a "best in class," but still

Packaging - fully in the APX SE's favor. You get two carry cases, a big, lovely leather case, way more tips that are also way nicer. I tried several pairs and settled on the sticky tips for both my Moses and my APX SE (medium on APX, small on Moses)

Stock cable - I love Eletech and everything they do, I disliked strongly Moses' stock cable. Too microphonic, too stiff, too bright sound-wise. It's collecting dust, if anyone wants to buy it, pm me

EDIT: I just found out that the PMG APX SE's stock cable isn't made by Eletech. I was pretty shocked cause it's basically a carbon copy of the Euclid

Fit and isolation - midly in favor of APX SE. Moses is more comfortable for long sessions, but not so comfortable to listen to outside. It just allows a lot of outside noise in.

Conclusion

I am very happy to not have to choose between the two. I think they're extremely complementary, and probably the best duo of IEMs you can own if you enjoy a more distant, laidback midrange

If I was forced to make a recommendation of one of the two, easily the Moses based on pricing. I think the tuning on both is excellent and pretty unique, and while the APX SE might be ever so slightly more technical overall, the Moses' staging is something I've never expected to find in any IEM. It's become a really big argument in favor of the Moses for me, and secured a spot for it in my collection for the months to come

If I was forced to only own one, I'd say APX SE. It's simple really, I've thrown god knows how many genres at it, and it's great at everything I throw at it.

Moses is on par with it with maybe 40% of my library, it's better than it with another 40%, but gets dusted in that last 20%. To put it this way, I probably wouldn't own Moses as my only IEM, but I would solo-own the APX SE I think... based on my first listen anyway

TLDR: I love both, they're amazing

IMG_4730.jpeg
great photo with king w4))))
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 1:56 PM Post #106,379 of 106,606
First off let me acknowlege that this thread is 4 years old today. It's a little amazing to me how this community has grown and thrived this past few years into way more than I could have possibly imagined. It's the power of community that makes this place what it is and I tip my hat to each and every one who has contributed in any way over the past few years. Love you all. Here's to another 4 years!

That being said here are the first results from our recent survey:

Watercooler 2025 Spring Survey Results Part 1

$2k+ Bracket

The winner:

Oriolus Traillii JP x17


Let me just take a minute to acknowledge how remarkable it is-- and appropriate on this the Cooler birthday-- that after all these years the old Bird is still right at the top. Let me also point out that I did not merge the Traillii Ti votes (which were 4) into the OG. Had I done that it would have even more of a lead.

The rest:

Subtonic Storm x14
PMG APX SE x13
Mysticraft HEX x13
Brise Audio Fugaku x11
Hercules Audio Moses x11


Elysian Annihilator x9
Aroma Fei Wan x9
Forte Ears MacBeth x9
Forte Ears Mefisto x8
Unique Melody Amber Pearl x7
Alpha & Omega Omega x7
Fir Audio Rn6 x7

Canpur CP622b x6
Empire Ears Raven x6

Campfire Audio Astrolith x5
Fir Audio Xe6 x5
Noble Chronicle x4
Elysian Dio x4
Nightjar Acoustics Duality x4
AME Mousa x4
Craft Ears Omnuum x4
Quill Audio Satin x4
Oriolus Traillii Ti x4
Campfire Audio Trifecta x4
Vision Ears EXT MKii x4
Vision Ears X/VE10 x4
64 Audio Fourte x3
Aroma Jewel x3
Unique Melody Mentor x3
Dita Perpetua x3
Dita Ventura x3


AME Raven x2
7th Acoustics Asteria x2
VE/AK Aura x2
Campfire Audio Clara Ti x2
Alpha & Omega Fulgrim x2
Elysian X x2
Fat Freq Grand Maestro x2
Lime Ears Maris x2
Empire Ears Odin x2
Vision Ears Phonix x2
Noble Viking x2
Volk Audio Etoile x2
Letshouer Cadenza
Kinera Loki Emerald
Soft Ears Enigma
NG Audio Erebus
Vision Ears Erlkonig
Penon Rival
Vision Ears EXT OG
Empire Ears Legend Evo
Jomo Flamenco
Unique Melody Red Halo
Soranik Mems 3s
Unique Melody Mason
EE/AK Novus
Unique Melody Soleil Tombe
Rhapsodio Sup 3
Plussound Volta
Ice Labs Spectrumica
Steranko S40
Noble Sultan
64 Audio u18t
Vision Ears VE8
64 Audio Tia Trio

Congrats! Happy Anniversary. It's hard to believe that watercooler is only 4 years old. I felt like I have spent much longer time on this thread. The list of $2k+ is both surprising and expected. Surprising is the bird's continued leading and HEX's 4th before its formal launch, expected are those familiar names, including my votes.

I visited @Audio46 yesterday. Since I had nothing specific in mind to test beyond what chance would throw my way, I asked some watercooler friends if there was anything they wanted me to demo and did just that.

I ended up listening to two IEMs:
  • Noble Audio AGIS II
  • CFA Alien Brain
And one headphone (I've posted my impression notes for this in the headphone watercooler thread):
  • Abyss JOAL

I'll cover here my short IEM demo impression. Both are just anecdotal impressions from listening to each for about half an hour and not meant as a review. I could definitely end up forming different impressions with a more thorough listen. With that caveat in mind..

I listened to these IEMs first using the cheap-ish iFi GoLink Max ($79) off my iPhone. I was simply curious to try that too. A tiny DAC/Amp dongle. I'll just say that for anyone who wants a truly pocketable thingy, this little thing is pretty awesome. I then also listened with the Chord Mojo2 that I'm familiar with.


AGIS II

As I understand it, the AGIS II is meant to be the successor of the Spartacus and it is similarly priced at $1,799.

Demo track impressions
My very first impression was that this IEM is warm tuned with a resolution on par with its price point (not extremely resolving nor lacking when not analyzing but listening to music). There is a bit of a lower treble recession with good upper treble detail.

I started with Marina Rebeka singing “Adagio in G Minor”. Her voice was very sweet and "rounded". Less air, more warmth. Switching to “Take 5” by Kenichi Tsunoda Big Band, I found cymbals and high percussion notes well resolving, perhaps a touch elevated, but non-fatiguing. An overall sense of warmer and wetter tuning. On the cover of “The power of love” by Vanny Vabiola I found the vocals sounded amazing. Lots of reverb. Not a neutral tuning, but colored in a very enjoyable way. Upper mids were forward and extremely pleasant. Wanting to explore female vocals further, I played “Imnul Lubirii” by María Coman. Her singing was exquisitely sweet sounding. Very lush vocal presentation. Switching off to instrumental jazz, I played “Almighty God” by Arne Domnerus. His sax playing on this track (wonderful album btw) was a bit more relaxed here. For some bass testing, I played Bozz Scaggs' “Desire”. Bass was good, more of a lush thump than a hard hitting transient kind of feel. Concurrently, hi-hats were notable in the treble and male vocals (lower mids) were nicely balanced. Again, a sense of warmer presentation with good upper treble detail popping in to complement. I then tried “Poetry Man” by Queen Latifah and got those wonderful female vocals again. Last, I put Sara K.'s wonderful track “Blind-Hearted”, which I've also found to be one of the more challenging tests for bass extension and resolution test tracks. This revealed the AGIS' limitation in bass extension and resolution, which I would describe as average.

TLDR
The AGIS may be the IEM I'd pick for long listening sessions and recommend to those who love warm tuning but still want treble detail, enjoy a relaxed presentation, and favor an enjoyable coloration to technicalities.

1745532163442.png

One more note. Like all Noble IEMs, the AGIS II comes in very nice packaging

1745532225233.png


CFA ALIEN BRAIN

I start by saying I may have made a mistake demoing these IEMs in this order. The Alien Brain, priced at $999, is definitely playing at a different price and performance bracket. This order may have biased my impressions. My demo wasn't long because they didn't appeal to my taste as much.

Build wise, the shells are unique shaped and small looking, but they didn't disappear in my ears as I expected and protruded, though I didn't mind it; comfort was not an issue for me.

Demo track impressions
I started with “Good Morning Gorgeous” by Mary J Blige and found the bass to be a bit rolled off. Playing “Que Sera Sera” by Jennifer Terran, I found vocal timbre to be just a hint metallic; if I'm honest, I think it would sound natural if I weren't listening critically while in demo mode. Wanting to test bass again, I put on "Mozart” by Jacques Loussier and found it lacked its usual punch; however, the piano sounded good!

TLDR
My main issue was a lack in bass quantity and articulation. To my ears and preference, the Alien Brain sounds ok but not great. At this price tier, I prefer the slightly cheaper price Legion (which, for disclosure and reference, I recently purchased).

1745532579885.png

Packaging was simple and unremarkable.

1745532920313.png
I like all the tracks you used in your impressions.
 
Apr 25, 2025 at 2:00 PM Post #106,380 of 106,606

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top