4N6
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2006
- Posts
- 893
- Likes
- 30
Quote:
There were a number of reasons I went the 307A route.
#1. Sound quality.
#2. Did I already mention the sound quality?
#3. I had a Cary SLP-05 pulling preamp duty in the speaker system, so the pre-amp facilities of the B-52 were not needed.
#4. The ability to drive all types of dynamic headphones. The B-52 can drive most normal headphones, but I also wanted to be able to use the AKG K-1000's, which unfortunately, the B-52 just does not have the power to do.
#5. Great customer service from TTVJ.
#6. The B-52 is truely a great headphone amp, and as such it was not much trouble selling it.
#7. See #1!
Originally Posted by KevM2 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Just curious 4N6. What was it that made you say, THIS is the amp I have to have? I know you prefer it to the B52, despite owning the B52 prior. But what was it that said, "I'll deal with the hassle of selling the B52 and I'll overlook the fact that the 307A has no preamp, but I have got to have this new amp!" Just curious because if I'm ever to spend this kind of money for an amp, I need to immerse myself in details lol. |
There were a number of reasons I went the 307A route.
#1. Sound quality.
#2. Did I already mention the sound quality?
#3. I had a Cary SLP-05 pulling preamp duty in the speaker system, so the pre-amp facilities of the B-52 were not needed.
#4. The ability to drive all types of dynamic headphones. The B-52 can drive most normal headphones, but I also wanted to be able to use the AKG K-1000's, which unfortunately, the B-52 just does not have the power to do.
#5. Great customer service from TTVJ.
#6. The B-52 is truely a great headphone amp, and as such it was not much trouble selling it.
#7. See #1!