I have a new reference in tonality and timbre: the Gamma Pro with protein leather Bose ear pads.
It has displaced my modded (in Purrin style) HD650 and 009 in that, both of which measure excellent, but sound-wise the modified Gamma Pro slaughters the HD650 in every respect.
The 009 (and 007) is still better overall (bass, stage, fine dynamic gradation etc), but the Gamma has no problems with the highs, it sounds so natural, full, energetic, and velvet-smooth - especially cello and piano sound so real. I've spent much of the night listening to cello+piano

.
The Omegas have more bass slam, but the modded Gamma Pro does not lack in bass.
It is interesting that when used with normal bias, the Gamma Pro sounds much like the normal-bias Gamma, that is quite much worse (especially in the treble) than the Gamma Pro with pro bias.
FR doesn't mean that much any more to me (e.g. based on measurements alone, the modded HD650 should sound way better than the others), but here we go. Disregard everything below 40 Hz and above 8 kHz, the data there depends on so many things. I judge those areas mostly by ear.
I have tried about 8-10 pads with the Gamma Pro. I selected the best sounding ones, the somewhat smaller Bose ear pads. The Stax 007 pads were also working well, with less bass.
Green: original Gamma Pro + pads: open, nice midrange, not much bass.
Violet: HD650: sounds a bit bland compared to the original Gamma, but still good.
Yellow: Gamma with cleaned up back (nothing but the drivers) + Bose QC15 ear pads. Quite much more bass slam than with the original pads, but ain't 007 yet. Nevertheless, enough to not miss anything, from orchestra to EDM. A new reference.
I am going to make some custom ear pads to the Gamma Pro, let's see if it can improve still. BTW the driver seems to be usable in almost any type of loading, including closed designs.
I also have the itch to make a TH900-like enclosure for it (with larger, damped cups), as the driver alone sounds much better than the TH900 driver.