[HiGHFLYiN9]

I actually find it more interesting that it took over 100 years to contest such a significant theory. 

 

[BotByte]

Quote:

I actually find it more interesting that it took over 100 years to contest such a significant theory. 

tech had to follow it all up.
 
In a couple years, we can have a concrete objection to the theory
 

 

[robm321]

[size=10pt]"I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing"[/size]
[size=10pt]- Socrates[/size]
 
[size=10pt]Keep trying scientists.[/size]

 

[logwed]

Perhaps I should skip my physics exam this evening, because clearly it's all just plain wrong. 

 

[GreenMachine]

http://i.imgur.com/QjJyM.jpg
 
This seems rather fitting. 
 
I look forward to seeing what will come out of this discovery. 
 
 

 

[BotByte]

 
Quote:

Perhaps I should skip my physics exam this evening, because clearly it's all just plain wrong. 

You could start a argument. It's a problem to know that everything you're learning will change in a couple years. Wait, everyone in the medical or mental health fields know this too.


Quote:

http://i.imgur.com/QjJyM.jpg
 
This seems rather fitting. 
 
I look forward to seeing what will come out of this discovery. 
 
 

Didn't the Proff also say that his ship moves the universe rather then moving through the universe?
 
...... science, can you keep up?

 

[grokit]

 
Quote:

Yippee...!!!!! Now we can go out and desecrate and abuse the whole universe - not just this lump of dirt.

Plunder, pollute and pave that's the American human virus way.

 

[GreenMachine]

 
 
Quote:

 

Plunder, pollute and pave that's the American human virus way.

 
The sad thing is, it's so true. 

 

[logwed]

Quote:

 

Plunder, pollute and pave that's the American human virus way.

Aren't all organisms like that, though?

 

[Head Injury]

Quote:

Aren't all organisms like that, though?

Yeah, but we have the technology to do it better and the intelligence to demoralize ourselves for doing it.

 

[Happy Camper]

I like scientific logic. It's true until proven wrong, then it's only wrong a little bit.

 

[Head Injury]

Quote:

I like scientific logic. It's true until proven wrong, then it's only wrong a little bit.

I like anti-scientific logic. It's true if you want it to be true.
 
Your statement is actually a great example! Nothing has been proven wrong yet.

 

[wuwhere]

E = m * n^2, n = the speed of neutrino.

 

[sphinxvc]

Cool!  
 
In general, a win for science if proven true.  
 
And probably a tough pill to swallow for the religiously scientific types.

 

[Head Injury]

Quote:

E = m * n^2, n = the speed of neutrino.

Somehow I don't think that will work 

 
I'm no theoretical physicist by any means, but probably the least messy way they could describe the neutrino's speed is that it popped through a fold in spacetime. In other words, instead of making its speed faster than light, it remains under the speed limit but travels less distance. That would preserve causality, wouldn't it? It's not actually moving back in time if it's not going faster than light, regardless of when it arrives.
 
This would have some fantastic consequences on faster-than-light travel, without actually requiring faster-than-light speed.