The Sennheiser "veil"
Feb 1, 2007 at 3:43 PM Post #256 of 372
Not really sure why this is such an insult to so many people, but reality is that unless an amp is intentionally designed to distort the signal, it will sound the same as any other.

Do some reading outside of Head-Fi if that upsets you.
smily_headphones1.gif


Here's an old, but typical, scenario with a few well-known people:

Quote:

As some may recall, Steve Zipser, after challenging a number of
objectivists to come on down to Sunshine Stereo to be shown the
light on cable and amp "sound", agreed to having Tom Nousaine and
myself be the first. Strictly as a matter of historical perspective
it should be noted that he often stated that people who could not
hear these differences were hard of hearing, and that there was
Zero chance he would fail in his demonstration.


Convinced that he was wrong on both counts, we showed up at
Sunshine Stereo (Steve's house) at the scheduled time (Sunday, August
25, 10 AM) to find a note pinned to the door stating that he had to
perform an emergency repair at a customer's house. It was 3PM by the
time we got started, but we still had time for a ten trial manual
switched blind test that day, and some ABXing the next morning.


Steve had stated that he felt the ABX box would veil differences,
so we had encouraged him to set up a test he felt comfortable with.
He planned to use his PASS Aleph 1.2 monoblocks as the reference amps,
and a PS Audio basic amp as the "bad" amp, and to manually swap cables
for the test. We quickly determined that he had no way to level
match these amps, so we substituted a Yamaha AX700 integrated amp,
which we had brought along, for the PS Audio amp. The Yamaha's level
and balance controls would allow matching of levels quite easily.
It should be noted that the Yamaha's preamp was always in the
circuit when the Yamaha was playing.


Steve's system (a very excellent sounding one, BTW) was an AA DDS Pro
transport --->AA DTI Pro 32 anti-jitter device--->Audio Logic DAC--->
Pass Aleph L preamp--->StraightWire interconnects--->Pass Aleph 1.2
monoblocks (or the CD input of the Yamaha integrated amp)--->big fat
Straightwire speaker cables (approx. 4' long)--->Duntech Marqui
speakers.


After we did a frequency response check of both amps using a test CD
and digital ac voltmeter at the speaker terminals (the Pass was
slightly better than the Yamaha), we level matched them at 1 kHz,
using the same method. Steve then did some sighted comparisons of the
two amps until he thought he had a "fix" on them. To create a random
sequence of "unknowns", I flipped a coin ten times, recorded the
results, decided heads would be the Yamaha and tails would be the Pass,
and used this list for the ten trials. The switching method throughout
this first session was to manually swap the interconnects and speaker
cables from one amp to the other. During the ten "blind" trials, Steve
would leave the room during the swap. (There were others in the room at
all times).


After the first blind trial, he did another sighted comparison, and
then did blind trials #2-#10 with only a couple of short rest periods.
During each trial, he played sections of the following tracks:
1) Ricki-Lee Jones "Hi Lili Hi Lo" from "Pop Pop"
2) Harry Connick Jr. "Don't Get Around Much Anymore" from "Harry Met
Sally"
3) "Rite of Spring", from Reference Recordings.


Results of this session: 3 out of 10 correct. (trials #2, #3, and
#7 were correct)


That evening Steve and Gigi took us to a wonderful little Italian
restaurant and treated us to an absolutely scrumpous meal.


The following morning he decided to try the ABX box. It was connected
with every attempt to give the advantage to the Pass amps. The ABX
box requires an extra interconnect and an extra speaker cable for
each channel and each amp. The Pass amps got the shorter of the
interconnects and very short (18") StraightWire speaker cables.
The Yamaha had to suffer under longer interconnects and extra 6'
pieces of zip cord (and of course, the extra built in preamp).
The amps were again level matched at 1 kHz.


Steve played a variety of music, switching between the A (Yamaha)
and B (Pass) amps. After his warmup, he took about an hour to run
through ten trials, playing segments from a variety of tracks during
each one.


Result: 5 out of 10 correct.


Next up, Steve's wife Gigi. She had commented during Steve's manual
switched test that she definately could hear the difference between
amps, but it turned out that what she thought was the Pass (on trial
#1) was actually the Yamaha. For her ABX session, Gigi focused in
on one particular segment of one track for all 16 of her trials.


Result: 9 out of 16 correct.


And finally, Steve's audiophile friend, Steve D., was on hand to
give it a try. Steve D. brought his own CD's and used a different
selection for each of his 10 trials.


Result: 4 out of 10 correct.


Enjoy. I'm out.
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 4:01 PM Post #257 of 372
hi
it actually takes some time to figure out which component is which and learn their sound sigs. plus they didn't do it property.
example:
in this the person not only has to tell a difference but which amplifier is which. well, why should a person have to do that? that a person can hear the difference is the main point of abx.

secondly, there was a time when i was a/b/xing a benchmark, zhaolu and wavelength and came to believe that hte zhaolu was the benchmark, the brick was the brick and the benchmark was the zhaolu. it didn't mean i couldn't tell the difference (i did) but that i assumed how one component sounded and based my comparison based on that.
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 4:20 PM Post #258 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gurra1980 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
OMG! Another thread about this! This is a veil thread not an amp thread!


Amps have veils?
confused.gif
confused.gif
eek.gif
tongue.gif

Joking! This is a headphone "V"-word thread!
eek.gif
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 6:17 PM Post #259 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by rodbac /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Not really sure why this is such an insult to so many people, but reality is that unless an amp is intentionally designed to distort the signal, it will sound the same as any other.


It would be nice if this were true.. it'd make audio a lot less expensive, and a bit more boring as well!
tongue.gif
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 8:31 PM Post #261 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by rodbac /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Not really sure why this is such an insult to so many people, but reality is that unless an amp is intentionally designed to distort the signal, it will sound the same as any other.

Do some reading outside of Head-Fi if that upsets you.
smily_headphones1.gif



Every time this thread comes up I say the same thing.

Learn a bit about electronics.

There are many design decisions which will influence the characteristics of an amplifier. All amplifiers distort the signal. Whether or not this is audible (and if so, pleasurable) depends on an incredible number of factors.

Speaker motors are complicated beasts. Source/amp matching can play a role (amp/source impedances). Safety (blocking caps) vs. sound (with DC offset). Phase distortion vs. bass rolloff. Mosfets vs. bipolar. Constant current vs. voltage amplification. Efficiency (class D or AB) vs. very low distortion (class A). 100khz vs. 200khz switching mode (affecting the complexity of the filter).

Don't forget that even if an amp measures well with an oscilloscope, the amount of distortion (not just harmonic) that you will have between the source and the air may be unpredictable. Changing coil temperatures, resonance and induction, etc.. can all affect the output stage's stability and linearity and ultimately the sound pressure in front of the speaker.

I mean come on.
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 8:50 PM Post #262 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by nightfire /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Every time this thread comes up I say the same thing.

Learn a bit about electronics.



Wonder if this endless thread is going to turn into the never ending vinyl vs digital thread under the dedicated components. Let's start listing and arguing about signal to noise ratios, frequency response graphs, and what datarates mean
icon10.gif
icon10.gif
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 9:04 PM Post #263 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by Davesrose /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Wonder if this endless thread is going to turn into the never ending vinyl vs digital thread under the dedicated components. Let's start listing and arguing about signal to noise ratios, frequency response graphs, and what datarates mean
icon10.gif
icon10.gif



Or..... how about the "all digital is equal" debate, by computer users who think in buffered-space and don't realize the clock signal is embedded with the data.
smily_headphones1.gif


Ho hum.
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 11:11 PM Post #265 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by rodbac /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Indeed.


Indeed x2. Best to go ask Jan Meier or Kevin Gilmore!
.
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 11:30 PM Post #266 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by JaZZ /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Indeed x2. Best to go ask Jan Meier or Kevin Gilmore!


Quote:

Originally Posted by rodbac
Anyone who tells you differently is probably trying to sell you an amp.


icon10.gif
Funny how that works.

Look- don't let me break up the circle-jerk. Go ahead and talk about the dark, lush sound of copper wires, the bright, sparkly sound of silver wire, and all the other nonsense.

I won't troll the threads anymore.
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 11:35 PM Post #267 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by rodbac /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I won't troll the threads anymore.


Fine.

By the way, you should really ask Jan or Kevin. Maybe there's something to learn from them. Of course you could just have asked me, because I hear distinct characteristics with different amps -- and I don't sell them.

You know, everybody's ears are different!
.
 
Feb 1, 2007 at 11:43 PM Post #268 of 372
My HD580's don't sound veiled to me and I've compared them to hp1000's. I have Grado sr-125's and they sound like someone just turned up the 6-16 khz range on the eq. Veiled Schmeiled. Somebody please come up with a more accurate 'catch' term.
 
Feb 2, 2007 at 1:19 AM Post #269 of 372
Quote:

Originally Posted by MatsudaMan /img/forum/go_quote.gif
My HD580's don't sound veiled to me and I've compared them to hp1000's. I have Grado sr-125's and they sound like someone just turned up the 6-16 khz range on the eq. Veiled Schmeiled. Somebody please come up with a more accurate 'catch' term.


people like to flame. So we have to think of negatives: Senns=veiled, AKGs=hollowed, Grados=harsh, Beyers=bass monsters, etc.

Who in their right mind would instead want to think of a better discription of a headphone's entire presentation? Something like this would be better, but obviously won't be used since we like the dead horse:

AKGs=detailed and airy, Grados=poppy or snappy, Senns=full bodied.....can't think of Beyers or ATs since I haven't spend much time with them. But those aren't catch phrases you can use in a flame war....so we must get back to thread craps.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top