- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Posts
- 3,415
- Likes
- 868
Well, I just received in the mail a JH13 TWag balance Protector recable, a female balance to 3.5mm adaptor, and a TWag XLR to male protector adaptor. After hearing the effect of fullsize headphones from the Protector from a few observations (Skylab, Jamato etc), I have been wanting to try my HD800 on the Protector, so without any delay I immediately go to compare the followings:
1. Itune-->Apple Lossless-->optical toslink connection-->Headroom UDAC-->SAA balance flat cable to-->Headroom BUDA/DPS on medium gain-->Balance SAA Voice recable --> HD800.
2. Ipod Classic 6 gen--Apple Lossles-->ALO SXC 18g-->Protector on medium and high gain--> Whiplash TWag XLR to Protector adaptor --> Balance SAA Voice recable --> HD800.
My protector has not been burn in at all. It has about five hours SE and one hour balance burn in time. I love vocal so I use a few tracks to compare the two settings. Specifically, I used the Irish Tenors (Danny Boy, Grace), Holly Cole Trio (I can see clearly now, Tennesee Waltz). I find specially with tennor and soprano voice, it is very easy to compare how an amp support a note being held in high intensity and duration.
In the track "I can see clearly now" the initial double bass sounded clear, full, crisp and punchy on both systems. I am very happy with the Protector.
In all four tracks when a high note is played, the UDAC/BUDA/DPS trio clearly has rounder and fuller performance. For the Protector system, it sounded amazingly good on medium volume (medium gain at 3 o'clock, or 12 o'clock at high gain). However, there are several instances that I do notice a slight cracking when I turn up to high volume (90 to 100 percent on both medium and high gain settings).
The Protector is amazingly quiet given the fact that I am listening to it at 90 percent volume now.
In term of quickness, punchiness, and crispiness, the Protector is about 90 to 95 percent of the BUDA/UDAC/DPS trio which is rather surprising to me.
In terms of sound presentation, both systems seem to have a similar distance to me. I find myself on the stage with the source.
The Protector seems to present the music a little closer to me than the desktop ssytem. Channel balance is pretty good.
I know this is just a very initial impression, but I don't think the overall picture or the final result is going to alter too much. I think after I have 200-300 hours on the Protector, I'll expect it to be a little smoother but as a protable system, I really think the protector is doing a very good job.
I think in the middle range, the Protector comes very close to the desktop system, in the low range and in the treble, the difference is a little bit more clear in that the notes are much more fuller and smoother for the desktop system.
Really the major difference between the two systems is that the desktop system sounded a little cleaner, smoother, fuller, and rounder. But the Protector is not far behind. If I have to put a number down, I will say the Protector is about 85 to 90 percent of the desktop trio and will be close to 90% when it is fully burn in.
Given the fact that the UDAC/BUDA/DPS trio, may not be the best of the desktop systems, it is nevertheless in the top group of desktop performers. I think for those people who wants to know whether the Protector can substitute for a destop system. I think it can compete with many medium level desktop systems. And for a portable system, it may be the only way one can listen a high level cans like the HD800 on the road. The bottom line is that the Protector is an enjoyable system and a rather capable performer at home or on the road.
My next interest is to compare the JH13 to the HD800 on the Protector.
I am also interested to hear from some of you who have received your Protector and your impression.
1. Itune-->Apple Lossless-->optical toslink connection-->Headroom UDAC-->SAA balance flat cable to-->Headroom BUDA/DPS on medium gain-->Balance SAA Voice recable --> HD800.
2. Ipod Classic 6 gen--Apple Lossles-->ALO SXC 18g-->Protector on medium and high gain--> Whiplash TWag XLR to Protector adaptor --> Balance SAA Voice recable --> HD800.
My protector has not been burn in at all. It has about five hours SE and one hour balance burn in time. I love vocal so I use a few tracks to compare the two settings. Specifically, I used the Irish Tenors (Danny Boy, Grace), Holly Cole Trio (I can see clearly now, Tennesee Waltz). I find specially with tennor and soprano voice, it is very easy to compare how an amp support a note being held in high intensity and duration.
In the track "I can see clearly now" the initial double bass sounded clear, full, crisp and punchy on both systems. I am very happy with the Protector.
In all four tracks when a high note is played, the UDAC/BUDA/DPS trio clearly has rounder and fuller performance. For the Protector system, it sounded amazingly good on medium volume (medium gain at 3 o'clock, or 12 o'clock at high gain). However, there are several instances that I do notice a slight cracking when I turn up to high volume (90 to 100 percent on both medium and high gain settings).
The Protector is amazingly quiet given the fact that I am listening to it at 90 percent volume now.
In term of quickness, punchiness, and crispiness, the Protector is about 90 to 95 percent of the BUDA/UDAC/DPS trio which is rather surprising to me.
In terms of sound presentation, both systems seem to have a similar distance to me. I find myself on the stage with the source.
The Protector seems to present the music a little closer to me than the desktop ssytem. Channel balance is pretty good.
I know this is just a very initial impression, but I don't think the overall picture or the final result is going to alter too much. I think after I have 200-300 hours on the Protector, I'll expect it to be a little smoother but as a protable system, I really think the protector is doing a very good job.
I think in the middle range, the Protector comes very close to the desktop system, in the low range and in the treble, the difference is a little bit more clear in that the notes are much more fuller and smoother for the desktop system.
Really the major difference between the two systems is that the desktop system sounded a little cleaner, smoother, fuller, and rounder. But the Protector is not far behind. If I have to put a number down, I will say the Protector is about 85 to 90 percent of the desktop trio and will be close to 90% when it is fully burn in.
Given the fact that the UDAC/BUDA/DPS trio, may not be the best of the desktop systems, it is nevertheless in the top group of desktop performers. I think for those people who wants to know whether the Protector can substitute for a destop system. I think it can compete with many medium level desktop systems. And for a portable system, it may be the only way one can listen a high level cans like the HD800 on the road. The bottom line is that the Protector is an enjoyable system and a rather capable performer at home or on the road.
My next interest is to compare the JH13 to the HD800 on the Protector.
I am also interested to hear from some of you who have received your Protector and your impression.