JamesL
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Posts
- 1,214
- Likes
- 17
Quote:
Thanks for the additional notes =)
I mentioned the changes in biasing scheme but I wasn't completely sure what it did.
Does the bypassing refer to the addition of c3/c5? The first time I looked at them, I thought those were the electrolytes, but I realize they were moved prior to the rail splitter.
And lastly, do you think the ad8610/lmh6321 will perform well on a 9.6v supply? The datasheets specify min Vs of +/- 5v for both, but it seems theres quite a bit of leeway before the opamp completely craps out.
If it's a bad idea, any alternatives that you can recommend in particular?
Thanks
Originally Posted by tangent /img/forum/go_quote.gif - The new class A biasing scheme removes previous requirement for hand-matched transistors - The new biasing scheme is adjustable, with a single pot adjusting both channels' bias - 4-layer board, allowing full ground plane and heat-sinking for the buffers - better bypassing |
Thanks for the additional notes =)
I mentioned the changes in biasing scheme but I wasn't completely sure what it did.
Does the bypassing refer to the addition of c3/c5? The first time I looked at them, I thought those were the electrolytes, but I realize they were moved prior to the rail splitter.
And lastly, do you think the ad8610/lmh6321 will perform well on a 9.6v supply? The datasheets specify min Vs of +/- 5v for both, but it seems theres quite a bit of leeway before the opamp completely craps out.
If it's a bad idea, any alternatives that you can recommend in particular?
Thanks