@Gilly87
I do not like your tone, because to me it sounds often arrogant and in a few cases maybe even insulting. However, I must say the product looks promising.
I am in dubio whether to pledge for the Explorer or not because on one side, the specifications look good. On the other side, I have not seen any (detailed) impressions of third parties, even if it's 'just' a pre-production model. As you said yourself before: the implementation of the components is what makes a DAP good or... less good.
If you happen to have an old, buggy pre-production model lying around that can give me an impression of the sound quality, and if I'm impressed, I might get the real deal and write a review here on Head-fi.
Hi there, nice to meet you...?
As a company rep, I'm not allowed to give impressions of my own product, per Head-Fi rules (probably a good rule, too).
I've offered a local LA Head-Fier an extended audition, but he hasn't picked up his sample yet. If I don't hear something from him, I may open up the offer to any LA/SoCal Head-Fier who has a good trading record and a few written reviews
![Headphone Smile :) :)](https://cdn.head-fi.org/e/headfi/smily_headphones1.gif)