Arainach
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2005
- Posts
- 1,983
- Likes
- 16
Quote:
Is there a quality difference between RAW and JPEG? Some, but it gets smaller and smaller with each generation of cameras. I can't tell much of a difference unless I'm intentionally underexposing with my D50. At the end of the day, the fact that I don't have to spend 1-15 minutes on each and every shot I take is more than worth the tiny difference RAW gives. I shoot JPEG exclusively unless I know I absolutely need the full dynamic range.
Originally Posted by shigzeo /img/forum/go_quote.gif lossy compression from the sensor and lossless from the sensor are very unlike audio where we really say we can hear a difference and most cannot. raw and jpeg offer from a distance still, very visually different images. often the jpeg looks a bit more vibrant though as it loses tones in compression and retains the most bright ones only. raw however has all the dark details that jpeg throws away and fine lines of colour that hide between every shade. it is quite stunning actually. but i shoot jpeg mostly. |
Is there a quality difference between RAW and JPEG? Some, but it gets smaller and smaller with each generation of cameras. I can't tell much of a difference unless I'm intentionally underexposing with my D50. At the end of the day, the fact that I don't have to spend 1-15 minutes on each and every shot I take is more than worth the tiny difference RAW gives. I shoot JPEG exclusively unless I know I absolutely need the full dynamic range.