Diving into technical specs, trying to figure out what you would recommend between these two choices. Valhalla 2 or Mjolnir 2? Cost aside, pretend they cost the same thing.
Currently using Vali, and it's not cutting it, even though it does sound quite nice and relaxing:
Maximum Power, 300 ohms: 220mW RMS per channel
Maximum Power, 600 ohms: 115mW RMS per channel
Valhalla 2:
Maximum Power, 300 ohms: 800mW RMS per channel
Maximum Power, 600 ohms: 450mW RMS per channel
Mjolnir 2:
Maximum Power, 300 ohms: 850mW RMS per channel
Maximum Power, 600 ohms: 425mW RMS per channel
So the technical specs say the HD 800 can use a maximum of 500mW over a long period of time. What does this actually mean? Is this at 300 ohms? The Valhalla 2 and Mjolnir 2 both have more than 500mW at 300 ohms, this isn't a bad thing is it, since it's more than 500?
I'm not a very technical person, so what does all of this really mean for me, the average joe wanting to listen to my music correctly powered? The money isn't an issue, I just want to make sure I get the right thing. EDIT: When I say money isn't an issue, I mean in that pricerange, and I would like to stick to Schiit for this particular discussion. Also, will Mjolnir 2 sound the same as Valhalla 2, or will it be different? After using the HD 700 with the Valhalla 2, that was an incredibly enjoyable sound with great PRAT. I'd be sad if all of that was lost with the Mjolnir 2.