Alchemistt
Head-Fier
Today, all day, at my house, there were 560S.
1) They are light, comfortable. This is "mega-cool".
2) A very wide stage is cool!
3) The sound is too bright in my opinion. slightly lowered the equalizer.
4) Working out the middle in the Shure 840 is better than in the 560S(
5) The bass was added with an equalizer, I did not notice any distortion.
6) There was no channel imbalance, I checked it on purpose.
7) The separation of tools on the Fostex t60p is better than on the 560S.
8) For me, there is a position of the headphones, in which the ear can feel the protrusion inside the cup (Which means that when the earbuds are pressed, it can be felt more often and more strongly (
9) So that the cups are not given, you need to increase the size of the headband, but then it does not touch the crown))
An ambivalent impression has developed... I'm thinking now, whether the 560S are my headphones, or whether the 660S should be listened to again and measured.
It's a pity there's no place to listen to Shure 1840(
1) They are light, comfortable. This is "mega-cool".
2) A very wide stage is cool!
3) The sound is too bright in my opinion. slightly lowered the equalizer.
4) Working out the middle in the Shure 840 is better than in the 560S(
5) The bass was added with an equalizer, I did not notice any distortion.
6) There was no channel imbalance, I checked it on purpose.
7) The separation of tools on the Fostex t60p is better than on the 560S.
8) For me, there is a position of the headphones, in which the ear can feel the protrusion inside the cup (Which means that when the earbuds are pressed, it can be felt more often and more strongly (
9) So that the cups are not given, you need to increase the size of the headband, but then it does not touch the crown))
An ambivalent impression has developed... I'm thinking now, whether the 560S are my headphones, or whether the 660S should be listened to again and measured.
It's a pity there's no place to listen to Shure 1840(
Last edited: