FWIW - I've been putting some more time in on these, and should be writing them up hopefully over the next week. Has been hard because I've been splitting my time between Zen, Titan 3/5, as well as trying to get my head around the X7.
Yesterday I spent around 3 hours with the S3 and only the S3 to try and nail it down a little more (so plenty of time to get accustomed to them).
At low level listening, they are not too bad - but the low bass is quite AWOL on them. The problem is, I have a tendency to try and turn them up to compensate for the missing bass. With more volume, the mids get fatiguing pretty quickly - not the highs - the mids. Too forward, and started to be come strident.
I don't have too many issues with the fit - but really dislike the flat cables.
I can totally understand where Avitron is coming from. And reading between the lines - especially as I know some of you like warmer signatures than I do, and I usually gravitate to a more balanced, and even slightly bright sound - the only thing I can think of is that there is some massive variation in the overall tuning with the samples we have.
I sent my graphs to Brainwavz engineers to check if I should ask for a replacement. Pandora confirmed mine were OK.
I won't say I dislike them - as they have their good points. But I will say that they introduce more issues than they solve, and for me personally (unless things change when I get to the critical listening part next week), they are a 50/50 IEM at best. At $80 there are far better earphones out there - really, comparatively on the value stakes I couldn't recommend them.
I do wish Head-Fi's "star" rating scale had 2-3 stars as an amber / average rating - rather than 3-5 = positive and 0-3 = negative. At the moment - I'm hovering at 2.0-2.5 - and I know it will come out as a negative review, but it is how I read them so far.
If any of you guys with measuring equipment - especially Veritas - can measure uncompensated (raw data) with included comply tips and post graphs - I would appreciate it.