The JVC HA-S500 thread.
Oct 24, 2013 at 7:54 PM Post #7,591 of 8,352
Just picked my S500s, didn't really believe the hype in this thread but I have to say I'm impressed.  I wont claim to be a audiophile and it's hard to compare headphones completely off memory but I would definitely say these are very comparable to Vmoda m80s and AT M50s.  Obviously at about half the price of both of them so a much better deal.  Only thing comparable at this price are CAL!s
 
Oct 24, 2013 at 9:01 PM Post #7,593 of 8,352
Oct 25, 2013 at 8:31 AM Post #7,597 of 8,352
Has anyone compared the JVC HA-S500 to the Sony MDR-ZX600 ?
 
I found these last ones to have a great build quality, but SQ really let me down and had to sell. Bass was extremely pronounced and loose. All other frequencies striving to survive the bass flood.
 
I am considering the JVCs as a replecement for a decent on the go headset...
 
Oct 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM Post #7,598 of 8,352
  Has anyone compared the JVC HA-S500 to the Sony MDR-ZX600 ?
 
I found these last ones to have a great build quality, but SQ really let me down and had to sell. Bass was extremely pronounced and loose. All other frequencies striving to survive the bass flood.
 
I am considering the JVCs as a replecement for a decent on the go headset...

 
To my ears, that is exactly how the S500s sounded on day 1.  However, the bass is very textured / controlled.  Bass quantity decreases significantly with time, making the cans more neutral (IMO), but still with emphasized bass.  I would describe the overall signature as warm and dark.  They do respond well to the EQ on my Sansa Clip+, allowing the mids to step forward.  Mids / upper mids don't have the finest detail, and there is a response spike around 7Khz, but the cans are well worth the $60.
 
Oct 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM Post #7,599 of 8,352
   
To my ears, that is exactly how the S500s sounded on day 1.  However, the bass is very textured / controlled.  Bass quantity decreases significantly with time, making the cans more neutral (IMO), but still with emphasized bass.  I would describe the overall signature as warm and dark.  They do respond well to the EQ on my Sansa Clip+, allowing the mids to step forward.  Mids / upper mids don't have the finest detail, and there is a response spike around 7Khz, but the cans are well worth the $60.

 
I will have to give them a try I guess, to find out...
 
Thanx for replying!
 
Oct 26, 2013 at 10:13 PM Post #7,601 of 8,352
S500, ZX700, CAL!, DJ100, K81DJ, or HARX 700 or 900?
 
I listen to EDM mostly and pop music...
Some isolation and minimal leakage would be the best!
I like my music to be more bright aka more highs and a some more bass :D
 
Oct 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM Post #7,602 of 8,352
S500, ZX700, CAL!, DJ100, K81DJ, or HARX 700 or 900?

I listen to EDM mostly and pop music...
Some isolation and minimal leakage would be the best!
I like my music to be more bright aka more highs and a some more bass :D
Then you want some Ultrasone's!
:D
 
Oct 27, 2013 at 12:26 AM Post #7,603 of 8,352
Then you want some Ultrasone's!
biggrin.gif

Can't afford
biggrin.gif

 
Oct 27, 2013 at 10:28 AM Post #7,605 of 8,352
  Yet the S500 are not basshead cans (Well in my opinion anyways).

 
The s500 is as close to a basshead supra-aural as you could get.  
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top