up late
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Posts
- 7,238
- Likes
- 3,381
do those same folks think that speakers have an unrealistic soundstage?
do those same folks think that speakers have an unrealistic soundstage?
i don't buy into the unrealistic soundstage malarkey. thought it sounded pretty impressive for a can. it worked well with jazz and acoustic music too imo.
only been talking soundstage. personally i like the abyss sound more than the hd800 overall fwiw.
I think that the HD800 has impressive width in terms of soundstage. Works fantastically with acoustic vocals, jazz and classical music. Not so great with rock and pop.
The Abyss has more depth in its soundstage and therefore has more layers. Of course, it's soundstage is not as wide as the HD800.
Which one prefers really depends on what one's perception of what music should sound like and perhaps the genre one is listening to.
Just my views.
The depth part was exactly my point. People often don't specify which aspects of the soundstage they are referring to.
Indeed...
Today I finally got to listen to the Abyss. (I listen to them in a quiet room at Oslo Hifi Center.) The setup was Auralic Taurus MKII amp and a Aurelic Vega Dac. My transport was Astell & Kern AK120 via optical output.
I have a pair of Fostex TH900 and a Chord Hugo, so I wantet to check out other headphones for my Hupo. Particular headphones with a larger soundstage as I listen to a lot of jazz and classical music. I first tried every Audeze can, Hifiman, Oppo and Sennheiser before I tried the Abyss. It was really interesting to hear almost every big flagship headphone in one sitting. I'm not going to compare them all now, but I can say my TH900 hold their ground pretty good... until I heard the Abyss AB-1266.
It was quite a revelation. In my opinion every other flagship headphone are playing more or less in the same league, just with different flavours. Abyss is certainly in a different league.
I played a variety of jazz trios, big Mahler symphonies, string quartets and some Pink Floyd. The first thing that struck me was that I soon forgot that I was wearing enourmous headphones. The music came from way beyond my head. And with such clarity that I felt that the musicians was in the same room. It was like a live, acoustic music experience. I would characterize them as the first "bright" headphone I'v truly enjoyed. They was also surpicingly comfortable to wear. The Abyss are not as bass heavy as my TH900. So for Pink Floyds The Wall I actually prefered the sound of my TH900, but for jazz and classical Abyss was pure magic. I think that the extreme detailed highs made them feel a bit on the bright side. But for me that is just perfect. If I'm going to buy another headphone Abyss and TH900 is so different that it's great to own both.
I tried Abyss directly from my Chord Hugo as well. Hugo was able to play them loud enough, but they sounded loose and much worse than from the Auralic Taurus. So I definatley have to buy a good amp for them as well.
Abyss is on top of my wish list now. Only problem is that they cost 8.800 $ in Norway. I was told that the price was negotiable, but it's certainly a big chunk of my sadly average income.
Eide
Love your review! Are you able to import it from a dealer in the USA?
Maybe. I told my Norwegian dealer about the huge difference in pricing. And they told me I could maybe get American price + norwegian tax and transportation cost. That would make it cost around 7000$... In Norway we automatically get 5 years warranty. That and higher taxing makes everything more expensive.