gregorio
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Posts
- 6,885
- Likes
- 4,123
[1] You be you and i be me.
[1a] What do you mean by calling everyone a lier that heard the difference and [1b] dont trust your ears whats the sense in that?
[2] Instead of relying on old facts only, while new things is discovered
[2a] like better designed ethernet cables for the purpose of audio actually improve audio quality ,
[2b] i suggest you try sotm dcbl cat7 vs generic one and listen yourself. Don't you think you should find out for sure before arguing about it?
[3] All i know and experience everytime i listen is more musical joy with supra cat8 replacing the cat5e utp cable.
1. What do you mean: That I be me and state the facts and you be you and make-up complete nonsense? Such as:
1a. I didn't call anyone a liar, let alone everyone, with one exception, I'm obviously calling you a liar because you've falsely stated that I'm calling everyone a liar! I don't doubt that those who hear a difference between ethernet cables really are hearing a difference. What I doubt is the reason they're hearing a difference: Assuming they don't have some serious fault (which is easily testable), the data exiting the ethernet network is IDENTICAL, whatever compliant ethernet cable is used. In fact, that's precisely WHY ethernet became so dominant in the first place (beating out Token Ring and other competitors), because it operated bit PERFECTLY on cheap twisted pair wiring! So, by definition of "identical"and "bit perfect" there can be NO DIFFERENCE and therefore the reason they're hearing a difference MUST BE due to some other reason, IE. Their perception!
1b. You have that exactly backwards! Not only is it clearly proven, clearly demonstrated and completely established fact but the very existence of music relies on the fact that you can't trust your ears. So "what's the sense" in contradicting completely proven/established fact? Obviously there is no sense, there's just nonsense which is based on ignorance of thet basic facts! I'm not going to give you a 400 year old basic introduction to western harmony but this 2 minute video also demonstrates the point:
A couple of points: A. I am NOT calling everyone who hears/perceives "faa" a liar!!
B. Apart from NOT being able to trust your ears, what explanation do you have for hearing "faa"? So, "what's the sense" in trusting your ears? You think maybe there's a magic audiophile cable in the chain that knows when you're watching and changes the audio from "baa" to "faa"? That makes sense to you does it?
2. Do you think any new things have been discovered in the last 5,000+ years? Do you therefore not rely on "1+1=2"? What new things have been discovered that invalidate "1+1=2", audiophile marketing and reviews maybe? You think that when gigabit ethernet was "discovered" everyone suddenly realised that 10/100 megabit ethernet never actually worked?
2a. Again, you cannot design an ethernet cable for the purpose of audio because ethernet doesn't carry any audio, it carries digital data! By definition, you design an ethernet cable for the purpose of meeting the specifications of the ethernet standards, it either fulfils that purpose or it's not an ethernet cable. How is this not obvious? What is also BLATANTLY OBVIOUS is that ethernet networks (using cheap twisted pair wires) all over the world transmit countless trillions of bits of data bit PERFECTLY every second. Please explain how you can "actually improve" on bit perfect!
2b. I have tried different cat cables and different ethernet speeds/standards and far more reliably than just listening, I've actually compared the resultant output/data. It's always been identical (bit perfect), except for one occasion when I setup the network incorrectly and got no data at all. So your question is right back at you, don't you think you should actually "find out for sure" what's coming out of your ethernet network "before arguing about it"? And while you're at it, learning some basics of music and/or human perception wouldn't go amiss either!
3. So you even admit it, "All you know" is what you experience, rather than any actual facts! Have you ever seen a Hollywood film? Did you experience the sounds of the locations and characters having conversations with each other or did you experience the actual facts? If it's the latter, how could you ever watch or enjoy a film?
Again, all your response achieved is to further prove my point. You just made-up false assertions, repeated false marketing and talked about "making sense" by contradicting the most well established/accepted basic facts, which is pretty much the opposite of "making sense"!
G