Quote:
Originally Posted by shamu144 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I am a bit confused with so many versions. My understanding was that since the beginning only the A version was designed to meet the specific tolerances of NAGRA equipment for recording/monitoring, as you can see on the A technical brochure.
I thought the S version was just the HiFi version (public), with the mono version introduced in 1951, and the stereo version introduced in 1957. Then later in the 70's arrived the DT48 blank / 8ohms version, and finally the E versions, as a sustitution of the old S and blank version.
Where is the NAGRA DT48S version coming from ? Thanks,
Yes, I am well aware of this risk But still worth the try I feel. I completely love the DT48E, and I guess the DT48A can not be THAT different, but definitely more raw sounding.
As for the 4070, I am not ready yet to go back to electrostats But one day....
|
The Original DT48S was the only headphone that met NAGRAs specifications.. So NAGRA endorsed them.. & they were called the NAGRA DT48S. Remember, the A model is audio metric, if they came before the NAGRA DT48S it wasn't sold to the public.. As the DT48A according to Beyer is a precise
instrument. There are differences in DT48S sound, Kevin brought up a good point , about different magnets or other materials being used, more cost effective.. Or, it's very possible the original DT48S was tailor made for NAGRA since they are so different then the DT48S I bought from you.. Then again, the E models are also said to fit NAGRAs standards.. So we are going in a circle. With a life cycle of 73 yrs, it's hard to pin these down.. A member from Audio Asylum claims they still make the DT48 in 600 ohm.. & I read about a 200 ohm DT48S. Truthfully, the only people who really know are probably dead by now. I'm getting a new pair of E pads with my DT48e 200 ohm Franken.. If you do buy the DT48a, they are yours if the original pads on my DT48e are still in good condition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamu144 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I am just speculating at this point, but do you think the bass roll off and smaller soundstage compared to the E version could be a downside of the supra-aural fit of the A rubber pads ? Since the design (housing) and positionning of the drivers are identical between the A and E versions, what other reason could justify those differences?
A few pages back, a study showed clearly how the bass response of the DT48E was influenced by sound leakage due to a bad sealing. I guess the supra-aural rubber pads do not offer the same seal quality as the E pads, hence could explain the differences perceived.
I am very curious to hear your thoughts on that KBI, since you own both versions. I am holding the trigger until I can clarify this point. Alternatively, I really would like to confirm that E pads can be fit on the A versions. I haven't actually seen any DT48A with E pads around...
Is it possible to completely remove this "slit type horizontal pouch" ? Then you could fit/stick the E pads on the aluminium housing with the driver hole in the center, like the E version.
Thanks
|
I'm sure it's possible. Beyer must have a good reasoning behind using a supra fit with rubber pads. Being Audio metric, I would assume the rubber padding has some benefits to it.. Work related. Erik says you can use the E pads on the DT48A. I tried & couldn't get them to stay.. Two different mechanisms. I know for certain you will get better bass impact.. I wrapped my rubber pads around my ears tightly & the improvement in bass was very noticeable, when I released the hold, it was like the bass deflated. I'm sure you could mod it to wear they will fit with the E pads..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rossinator /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Actually I think I have seen such a picture. On the wiki, that I assume kool buba started, there is a picture of a modded A model, with what appears to be modded E model earpads on it.
And it looks like they are both identical except for the earpads and FR.
And I still think that the rubber earpads effects the FR a lot. I tried the A model with some modded HD280 earpads and the highs were a lot more noticeable. There also seem to be a spike somewhere in the FR that hurt my ears.
|
Can't take credit for that. Someone else started it.. I did contribute with the pics.. I made copies & sent them to another headfier over seas to post..(
Thank you, by the way) I have no doubt the rubber effects the FR, this was intended for a certain reason, definatly not for music. Damn. I sound like the Indiana Jones of the headphone world.. Trying to piece together the time line of the first headphone ever created. Maybe we should look towards Egypt.