- Joined
- Apr 2, 2012
- Posts
- 563
- Likes
- 55
agreed.
Indeed. I think he has problem getting a good fit on original pads, since it may alter the sound signature.
agreed.
Indeed. I think he has problem getting a good fit on original pads, since it may alter the sound signature.
I don't have a problem with the fit, I just have a problem with AKG pads in general.That is why I changed the pads on my K702, K271 and K240. I prefer leather pads to vinyl and pleather. Pleather and vinyl get sticky in 1 minute and it annoys me. Not comfortable either.
Then that's YOUR PROBLEM.
Calling them "VERY CRAP" is not very informative and highly bias for no good reason.
My problem is also the problem of many others.
Any problem people will find with headphones is highly subjective. Sound, comfort, etc. No one has the same ear/head size, no one has the same sensibility to sound, no one has the same perception of sound, no one knows for true what neutral sound is. I have the right to find these headphones pads sticky (and I have seen many others complain about AKG pads). I also have thr right to find these headphone too harsh on treble (most people will tell you they are indeed compared to many other headphone brands). It may be my problem (and the problem of others), but calling this as non-informative is quite funny. There are headphone companies that take care about every detail of the headphone, and the pads' quality is not too be taken as a bonus. Sennheiser and Beyerdynamic for example have understood this well. AKG on the other hand have failed miserably on most of their products. Of course here, Stax and Audeze pads can save them...
I understand very well any type of sound is subjective. you do not have to elaborate on examples of what is consider as subjective.
What I have against your comment is your comment of "VERY CRAP".
You say it is "quite funny" for me to complain about what is uninformative.
Then can you explain to me how "VERY CRAP" is informative?
You seem to like to elaborate on things that do not require elaboration, you might as well elaborate on "VERY CRAP" as well.
Only if you can successfully do this will I take the rest of your criticism against this headphone seriously.
My problem is also the problem of many others.
Any problem people will find with headphones is highly subjective. Sound, comfort, etc. No one has the same ear/head size, no one has the same sensibility to sound, no one has the same perception of sound, no one knows for true what neutral sound is. I have the right to find these headphones pads sticky (and I have seen many others complain about AKG pads). I also have thr right to find these headphone too harsh on treble (most people will tell you they are indeed compared to many other headphone brands). It may be my problem (and the problem of others), but calling this as non-informative is quite funny. There are headphone companies that take care about every detail of the headphone, and the pads' quality is not too be taken as a bonus. Sennheiser and Beyerdynamic for example have understood this well. AKG on the other hand have failed miserably on most of their products. Of course here, Stax and Audeze pads can save them...
Ok. These pads are soft but they're made of cheap material and from the looks of it they will deteriorate very rapidly.
Only if you can successfully do this will I take the rest of your criticism against this headphone seriously.
He's already already griped about how bad the treble is, describing them in a way that would make them unlistenable to you or I if we thought they sounded like that. Yet he still listens to them. Now griping about the pads on AKGs as a general problem, but still buys AKGs knowing what the pads are like. And despite griping about the SQ of the K550s, bought expensive Lawton pads to try with them. When the actions are in such conflict with the words, I can't ever take someone seriously. LOL
Because when I don't like smething on first hand I generally keep on trying. In most cases it pays. The sound signature is something I will try to get used to. Still hurts my ears, but at lower volumes it it listenable. The headphones have some qualities and you have to find out about them. Oh and when I said many people had this problem, it's because I'm actually reading reviews on head-fi and other forums. Are these people lying?
Ok. These pads are soft but they're made of cheap material and from the looks of it they will deteriorate very rapidly. I verified that I wasn't the only one making a sticky mess with them after 1 minute of wearing. How is this great engineering? You pay 200 dollars for a headphone pair and you get this. AKG could have sold these 300 USD instead of 200 USD and not cut in the essentials like the pads (both ear and headband). If you look around this thread, you will see lots of people trying to find mods for these major flaws.
Many others? You've taken a survey?
Your problem could also be the problem of many others. You are assuming too much by claiming that your problem is also shared by many others.
Let me play your own game:
I love the K550 pads. My love is shared by the 99.9% of the people who put the K550 on. Many others do not have a problem with the K550 pads, therefore, anyone who claims that AKG pads are crap are completely wrong.
See what happens when you pull facts out of your...err...thin air?
I love the pads - they are really comfy and they provide incredible isolation - but I don't doubt that there might be other pads that could work better for some people.
Because when I don't like smething on first hand I generally keep on trying. In most cases it pays. The sound signature is something I will try to get used to. Still hurts my ears, but at lower volumes it it listenable. The headphones have some qualities and you have to find out about them. Oh and when I said many people had this problem, it's because I'm actually reading reviews on head-fi and other forums. Are these people lying?