crazyfrenchman27
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2004
- Posts
- 2,685
- Likes
- 15
I think you will find the difference between UCSD and UCB insignificant, as far as academic workload and overall quality of education is concerned. Both will host enormous lectures with a professor that, more often than not, cares very little about teaching. Poor saps (i.e. graduate students) like me will be the ones fielding complaints from you about your $#&^ grades and dealing with all the $#$% the professors don't want to deal with (i.e. the real teaching).
I also doubt you will care whether your lecturer is "famous" or not after you realize that you will have little contact with him and that his acclaim has very little to do with his quality of instruction (I could provide an exhaustive list of examples from my experiences at UCSD grad school, but I doubt you are interested in that kind of thing).
Prestige is meaningless when it comes to this level; what is ultimately important is that you will be happy there and, hopefully, the corresponding academic success you will derive from that happiness. A 3.7 GPA from UCSD is going to be treated the same way as a 3.7 GPA UCB or a 3.7 GPA from Harvard when grad schools/med schools/law schools start examining you. The trick is figuring out which place provides the appropriate atmosphere to achieve that academic success.
Personally, I detest northern california with a vengeance and can't understand why anyone would want to live there. We not only have more attractive women, but also better weather and better college basketball teams. I think that you will find that these are probably the three most important things in college, if not the universe.
Over the years, I have begun to recognize that institutionalized learning is something of a farce. Nearly all of the important things in life you'll learn outside of class and they'll be things you taught yourself. You don't go to school to learn about any particular subject; that would be rather quaint because, in five years, most of the things you learn in school will become outdated.
No, the real things you are supposed to learn in school are the following:
1) Learn how to learn. You will have to learn efficiently for the rest of your life if you wish to achieve success.
2) Learn how to deal with stress. You will have to be able to successfully manage stress for the rest of your life if you want to achieve success.
3) Learn how to make social connections in order to obtain your objectives. This is really important, yet very few people on head-fi are able to do it. That's why they spend so much time on head-fi talking about SAT scores and other meaningless psychometric evaluations instead of doing what they should be doing: hitting on girls.
If you already know how to do these things, then there's really no reason why you ought to attend college except for that meaningless piece of paper. Most people don't know these things even after graduating from college/s, which is why the world wallows in callousness and incompetence.
So yeah, you should go where you think you will be happy and where you have to waste the least amount of money for quality girls, DI basketball, and weather.
-Matt
I also doubt you will care whether your lecturer is "famous" or not after you realize that you will have little contact with him and that his acclaim has very little to do with his quality of instruction (I could provide an exhaustive list of examples from my experiences at UCSD grad school, but I doubt you are interested in that kind of thing).
Prestige is meaningless when it comes to this level; what is ultimately important is that you will be happy there and, hopefully, the corresponding academic success you will derive from that happiness. A 3.7 GPA from UCSD is going to be treated the same way as a 3.7 GPA UCB or a 3.7 GPA from Harvard when grad schools/med schools/law schools start examining you. The trick is figuring out which place provides the appropriate atmosphere to achieve that academic success.
Personally, I detest northern california with a vengeance and can't understand why anyone would want to live there. We not only have more attractive women, but also better weather and better college basketball teams. I think that you will find that these are probably the three most important things in college, if not the universe.
Over the years, I have begun to recognize that institutionalized learning is something of a farce. Nearly all of the important things in life you'll learn outside of class and they'll be things you taught yourself. You don't go to school to learn about any particular subject; that would be rather quaint because, in five years, most of the things you learn in school will become outdated.
No, the real things you are supposed to learn in school are the following:
1) Learn how to learn. You will have to learn efficiently for the rest of your life if you wish to achieve success.
2) Learn how to deal with stress. You will have to be able to successfully manage stress for the rest of your life if you want to achieve success.
3) Learn how to make social connections in order to obtain your objectives. This is really important, yet very few people on head-fi are able to do it. That's why they spend so much time on head-fi talking about SAT scores and other meaningless psychometric evaluations instead of doing what they should be doing: hitting on girls.
If you already know how to do these things, then there's really no reason why you ought to attend college except for that meaningless piece of paper. Most people don't know these things even after graduating from college/s, which is why the world wallows in callousness and incompetence.
So yeah, you should go where you think you will be happy and where you have to waste the least amount of money for quality girls, DI basketball, and weather.
-Matt