ryanmatic
500+ Head-Fier
Interesting fact:
The Solitaire T is designed by Axel Grells wife. Axel Grell is the guy behind famous headphones like the Sennheiser HD600 and HD800.
at minute 19:20
Oh man, that is fascinating. Thanks for sharing!
Interesting fact:
The Solitaire T is designed by Axel Grells wife. Axel Grell is the guy behind famous headphones like the Sennheiser HD600 and HD800.
at minute 19:20
That sounds odd. With stock EQ, the SolT is not a bass-focused headphone but it definitely has good extension and low end presence. I find the bass boost EQ pushes the lower frequencies over the top—I wouldn’t describe either as “thin” sounding, but certainly not when that EQ is applied.I have recently bought a pair of Solitaire T and had been 'burning in' the headphones for over 100 hours already. The soundstage opened up nicely, the mids and the trebles are all superb. But the bass is very recessed and lacking. Both in bass extension and the volume of bass relative to the rest of the frequency response. That's even after I used the Bass Boost in EQ. The overall result is the headphones sound very thin with anemic bass response.
Does anyone have the same experience ?
Unfortunately, I had a similar experience with them. No matter what I did, the bass was either lacking (standard EQ), or it was enhanced with bass boost, but mids and highs suffered greatly. I wish they would update their EQ settings to allow for more customization, though it doesn't seem like it'll happen anytime soon. I ended up reverting back to my Shure 846 Gen 1 IEMs. I'm also considering Focal Bathys MG, but I can't justify the price.I have recently bought a pair of Solitaire T and had been 'burning in' the headphones for over 100 hours already. The soundstage opened up nicely, the mids and the trebles are all superb. But the bass is very recessed and lacking. Both in bass extension and the volume of bass relative to the rest of the frequency response. That's even after I used the Bass Boost in EQ. The overall result is the headphones sound very thin with anemic bass response.
Does anyone have the same experience ?
When they are on, they are using the same battery to amplify the signal (and the same dac/amp, plus an adc) as when they are in Bluetooth. Something is odd with your setup. Aside from codec, there shouldn’t be much difference in sound between wired+on+hq and Bluetooth+hq.By wired, I mean the 3.5mm Analog Input cable. I have not tested the USB option yet.
When using the Analog input option, the headphones can function Either with Power On ( active ) Or without Power On ( passive ).
When the Power is Off, I find the sound thin and anemic. Similar to used in wireless mode.
When the Power is On, the sound is balanced and correct.
Above is my findings.
By wired, I mean the 3.5mm Analog Input cable. I have not tested the USB option yet.
When using the Analog input option, the headphones can function Either with Power On ( active ) Or without Power On ( passive ).
When the Power is Off, I find the sound thin and anemic. Similar to used in wireless mode.
When the Power is On, the sound is balanced and correct.
Above is my findings.
I can only tell what I hear.When they are on, they are using the same battery to amplify the signal (and the same dac/amp, plus an adc) as when they are in Bluetooth. Something is odd with your setup. Aside from codec, there shouldn’t be much difference in sound between wired+on+hq and Bluetooth+hq.
If it sounds bad when passive, that’s odd too. What are you using as amp/dac?
Unless the music player has a decently powered amp, that may be your problem with passive mode. I've got mine going through a Chord Mojo 2 and it's quite good. In that case, I would expect turning it on to sound better because its internal amplifier and DAC are quite good.My setup here is also the simplest and most direct. Music player direct to the headphones by Analog Input cable.
This may be a hint too, the Px8 (in my experience) was so bass forward that mids got all but lost. The ST has very different tuning that definitely sounds thin in comparison. I can't explain why you hear such a difference between Bluetooth and Active wired unless there is EQ in the mix or you're using a very poor audio codec when connected with bluetooth.3. Wireless using Bluetooth, the sound is very lean and vastly inferior to my B&W Px8 but better than my Bose Ultra Comfort.
Thanks for your comments.Unless the music player has a decently powered amp, that may be your problem with passive mode. I've got mine going through a Chord Mojo 2 and it's quite good. In that case, I would expect turning it on to sound better because its internal amplifier and DAC are quite good.
This may be a hint too, the Px8 (in my experience) was so bass forward that mids got all but lost. The ST has very different tuning that definitely sounds thin in comparison. I can't explain why you hear such a difference between Bluetooth and Active wired unless there is EQ in the mix or you're using a very poor audio codec when connected with bluetooth.
Is it the same device/software serving the bluetooth music and the wired music?
I had them 'burn in' longer. After around 160+ hours, the volume suddenly got a lot louder, dynamics improved, and the bass amount and bass slam increased, becoming much fuller and detailed so that you could delineate the bass lines much better. So my conclusion is it takes this much time to 'burn in' the Solitaire T.Unfortunately, I had a similar experience with them. No matter what I did, the bass was either lacking (standard EQ), or it was enhanced with bass boost, but mids and highs suffered greatly. I wish they would update their EQ settings to allow for more customization, though it doesn't seem like it'll happen anytime soon. I ended up reverting back to my Shure 846 Gen 1 IEMs. I'm also considering Focal Bathys MG, but I can't justify the price.